Free Order on Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 48.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 18, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 371 Words, 2,235 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22939/22.pdf

Download Order on Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Connecticut ( 48.3 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Connecticut
i A A . i
N _ N. · * = • ase 3:03-cv-O1OQ%SRU Document 22 Filed 12/1_7/2002350: |?&gQA»».9¥C1lg»€,$l,,,,L_ ‘
l l
E, { . FILED
. S I
§` llllll 0lZl 30 P l2= 20 r
as
ra
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR']lj$_ U 2 S lily?} l N
$-,3 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT l E .lil’·;i.`.i)i,l.·; l l- 1 .
s ’ l
e
=
8 JOSEPH ATTIAS & HAIM ATTIAS : CIVIL NO. 3:03 CV 01009 (SRU) N
W
E Plaintiffs 2 N
S . .
LE PATRONS MUTUAL INSURANCE :
E COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT : N
"U
E Defendant : October 28, 2003 N
ti l
N
J:
E
E MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
O
’§ . Pursuant to Rule l2(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiffs hereby move for a
¤¤ .. ‘
EL » more definite state, regarding those aspects of the defendanfs affirmative defenses and counterclaim dated N
=·?= . y {
8* . T October 24,2 003 hereinafter specified, in order to permit an intelligible basis for the filing of a responsive
s iii l
E l pleading: -
S 1. ‘ Q Counterclaim
P} I ,J ·
I-. r··-..1 · · `
§ A. ` The plaintiff requests an articulation as to the contractual and for other legal basis under which the
gn defendant’s counterclaim is based as to the recovery of monies paid to the mortgagee bank.
QE m Reasoning in Support of This Request: The counterclaim as currently plead is conclusatory in nature
,_F:= J
§ é` and does not meet even the minimum notice requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. N
E 0
L; E, There is no way for the plaintiffs to determine the basis under which this counterclaim has been
.·.: =- -
<·> O :
E C2 brought. In order for the plaintiff to evaluate the necessity or appropriateness of posing or preserving N
·¤ .
E fg §” certain defendant, including the “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted" requests the
@9 · 5
"¤ Q ; *1
2 E _= defendant to set forth the contractual andfor other legal basis for the claim for recovery of monies paid
[-l O; a l···* wl:
. ‘ .¤ __'
E Ig ,.§ S to the mortgagee bank.
nv 5 5 § I
¤ cu cd
»-• "" 3
G E _&°·l 5 N
ge .. I __ or __ I __ g __ gg __ i"i`i"i‘i