Free Letter - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 126.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: May 16, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,066 Words, 6,742 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/21796/76.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Connecticut ( 126.5 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Connecticut
` 77. V.....-—“._u“~_i.—.. .M.aa.._...—?...4..._|uL.au_|.m......L.__.-mr4,.,___________,_r_______"___ _________ _____
{ Case 3:03-cr-00078-SRU Document 76 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 1 of 4

l li `````’ ~ *
I ._ I;;~.·;·;;II’te2 i‘Q<"=*i_Y‘·?
I April 26, 2006 -,~ iii tit
l Honorable Stefan R. Underhill
{ United States District Judge
United States District Court
District of Conneticut
915 Lafayette Boulevard
Bridgeport, CT 06601
Re: United States V. Kenneth Moore 3:03-cr—00078-SRU—1
Dear Judge Underhill, l
Respectfully, I am requesting your ruling regarding the Government's l
Writ of Execution filed against my exempt[emphasis added] wage earnings l
settled by the Department of Labor May 4, 2005 on my behalf from my
former employer L & S Mortgage. Currently, I am experiencing severe
financial difficulty and hardship in supporting my four dependent chidren
and maintaining my young adult son in college. Federal law states that my
wage earnings are exempt from attachment pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 3203(a).
One full year has past since the filing of the Government's Writ of
Execution upon the Department of Labor, and approximately two full
years without any income to support my immediate family. Accordingly,
I am praying for relief in Striking the Government's Writ of Execution
and order releasing my wage earnings from the State of Conneticut
Department of Labor presently being held in escrow pending your ruling.
R;§?e6tfully, I
Ke I
Kenneth Moore I
P.o. Box 1000 y I
RDAP/ICC 15082—014
Lewisburg, PA 17837 }
I
I
K I




l l
l
Case 3:03-cr-00078-SRU Document 76 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 2 of 4
Opportunity * Guidance it Support _
· We rc Am! Work Jlace Smndmmts Dit»i,;.~imi
. =;··
_?2;i_-Qi?-wi =-_§ l·l"<¤.2v lmwvwrrr li-»’al·lll·i-ig ( ‘‘_· 0,,,,l,·m,,,_,-
- {£;,O;_Nt_N E niéry 2636790 (S60) 265.46791 {
Minimum l’Vczge*/()vcr·rl`me PIJIIJIIIIC Conrmlcr Comp/imma
(860; zrismvri (gm) 263..mg
.. .i=i“Z§ .f` = ~.. .. ’="3?=§·i‘i=i‘iF:§ li;-§»" . ,
-_ M:. i_;;,.=;;¤_l;;r ·_ \ l·l”eb.s·ltc Fax
’ .`-/-‘` ’i-` ‘*/i ‘’=:‘‘i * A ` Ww»i.C-lirnimt.all {86/)) 263..654, l
l
l\/lay 4, 2005 `
Kenneth Moore 15082-014
FCI PO. Box 2000 ‘
Unit N0. 5741 East —
Fon Dix, NJ 08640 " ‘·
Re: L&S Mortgage l
Dear Mr. Moore: Q
Reference is made to the claim for wages that you filed against the above named compan .
V
A final settlement has been reached. L&S Mortgage has agreed to pay $10,620.72 in back V
wages on the Peters, Brown, Alwani, Mitchell, Gulley and Drayton loans. For a detailed I
breakdown, refer to Field Supervisor Barrachina’s March 29, 2005 letter. Be advised that there
were no documents to support your commission plan to include payment on the Yield Spread. l
· l
The payment plan is as follows: L&S Mortgage will make payments to the Department of Labor.
This is a standard operating practice to ensure the checks are negotiable. The payment plan
calls for payment of $1 ,620.72 to be made by May 20, 2005. Each month thereafter a total of
$1,000.00 is due until the bill is paid in full. You will be contacted again in regards to the
collection of these wages.
Respectfully, ·
Amy Jachimowski _
· Wage Enforcement Agent
Ext. (860) 263»6719 I
l
E
200 Folly Brook Boulevard,Wethersfie|d,CT 06109-1114 · Fx; 860.263.6541 · wwvv.ctdol.state.ct.us
An Equal Opportunity/Ahfrmarive Action Employer

1
I
Case 3:03-cr-00078-SRU Document 76 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 3 of 4
Oppturtuniiy * Guidance >= Support 1
· Wrree Am! F*V0r·irpiczcc ST(U1d(li”(£§ ,0114656,6 1
1 ·’{= rr A /»1/ A flfé r ·r~»·1~~r <` (»»/( 1 1
-` r-`_ /Ml//'lfffil,/IT? H/CFg(?/()l’C’/‘.ff}}?€’ /’r¢/J/16- Comm;-1 (`o:1·zp/{ance
{S60} 26.*67911 6at60126s~679r1 1
1`*[?·Z_f -`-·- `¤~‘ 1 1*1·’¤l>-We im 1
l -·_· 5 _._-- 1-1,; ·‘`= Z 'EI: ` 1 `.-= 1; `-'`'0` 111 1 w11»w.c·rd¤!..1·m:e.cz. 11.1- (S60) 263-651;; I
1
June 3, 2005
1
1
Kenneth Moore
110 Raintree Court
- Aurora, IL 60504
_ _ · 1
RE: L&S Mortgage 1
Dear l`v1r. Moore:
Enclosed is a Writ of Execution that our office received from U.S. District Court, Bridgeport, I
Connecticut. This office will be sending your wages to the US Attorney. We are no longer going
to pursue for additional compensation. lf you feel you are entitled to additional wages you will 1
need to hire a private attorney. · 1
1
Respectfully, 1
Amy Jachimowski ·
Wage Enforcement Agent
(860) 263-6719
Enclosure
1
1
1
200 Folly Brook Boulevard, Wethersfie!d,CT 06109-11 14 · Fx: 860.263.6541 · www.ctdol.state.ct.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirnvative Action Employer `

S Case 3:03-cr-00078-SRU Document 76 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 4 of 4
. Ir I
time is, 2004 4
Lamont Wright
L & S Mortgage · ‘·
750 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06103 -
. Re: Kenneth Moore wage claim l
Dear Mr. Wright: ‘ · *
A claim for unpaid wages has been filed against you in this office by Kemieth Moore.
He states he was employed by you and was not paid in iiill for work performed. Listed below is the period _
worked andthe amount claimed to have been earned. i
Period Worked Type of Claim Amount
3/03 — 3/04 Commission and Salary as $42,955.00
- attached i
If the wages claimed are due, kindly forward to this office immediately a negotiable check or money
order made payable to the claimant. If you contest this claim, you must advise this office by return
mail the reason why payment should not be made by June 25, 2004. Interest will be assessed on any
unpaid wages received after that date in accordance with section 31-72.
Failure to pay wageswhen due is a violation of s,ection'3 l—7·lb ofthe Connecticut General Statutes and is
punishable by a fine and/ or imprisonment, in accordancéiwith Section.3 1-71 g. `Connecticut General
Statutes section 3_l—6_9_a provides for thecollection of a civil penalty of $300..00 for each violation of _ wage
law. Section 31-72 ofthe Connecticut General Statutes provides for civil action and theassessment of ·
interest from the date the wages should have been received.
Your cooperation in responding to this claim is appreciated. .
Sincerely,
Rosemarie DeRobertis
Wage Enforcement Agent '
Voice mail (860) 263—6622 I
l
. - I