Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 75.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 12, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 523 Words, 3,118 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20126/112.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Connecticut ( 75.3 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Connecticut
1 Case 3:02-cv-01929-SRU Document 112 Filed O9/12/2005 Page 1 of 3
1 " C) O
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT C E
\ DISTRICT OF CONNECTIC §D
STEVEN MILNER and I-IEIDI CANNON : 3:O2dm5lS[E9[@R]A`) H;
V' ’ DQSTRICT CUUR i
LESTER DUNCKLEE, ET AL : Q
OBJECTION TO STIPULATION TO DISMISS
The defendants and co—plaintiff, Heidi Cannon, have entered into
a StlpulnLiQnrLQ.Di&mi&§, dated August 4, 2005,(see exhibit ‘Af
attached) to dismiss the above entitled action as to plaintiff C nnon.
Said stipulation was received by plaintiff Milner on September 9J
2005. The parties held depositions on August 29th and 30th, 2005. I
Through those depositions, the co—plaintiff Milner has learned tlat A
plaintiff Cannon has falsified her testimony, has altered her set of
facts to facilitate dismissal, and has implicated plaintiff Milne as
the sole initiator of this action. The plaintiff's are involved i a
dissolution of marriage action in the Connecticut Superior Court,
FA—04-4100154. Plaintiff Cannon is attemting to shift the liabili y of
the present action onto plaintiff Milner.
Wherefore: Plaintiff Milner has facts and witnesses that wou d
refute Ms. Cannon's testimony. Plaintiff Milner requests an immed ate
hearing before this court to determine the disposition for dismis al.
Plaintiff Milner requests that the defendant's Stipulation to Disaiss
be denied. . U
- ` E
I
F







I
·· N Case 3:02-cv-O192&§RU Document 112 Filed O9/6252005 Page 2 of 3
N . a_a. 3
'
i ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED x
TESTIMONY IS REQUIRED E
THE PLAINTIFF
STEVEN MILNER
. PO BOX 25 ’
STONINGTON, CT 06378 I
860—599-2930 A
CERTIFICATION _
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed postage, aid
on september 10, 2005 to the following: 1
Heidi Cannon ijggzéw A.. ` ?
8 Cutler St. g;?j/ /Q;§d;—·’
Stonington, CT 06378 TEVEN MILNER
Scott Karsten g
29 S. Main St. I
W. Hartford, CT 06107 I
Rhonda Tobin L
Robinson and Cole, LLP
280 Trumbull St.
Hartford, CT 06103 ·

\
l
L

i..--..._._._
i <‘ · t 112 Filed 09/ /2005 Page 3 013
i 4 ase 3:02-cv-0192€=§RU Documen
I
-
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _
} DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _ U
{ STEVEN MILNER, and HEIDI CANNON, : NO. 3;02Cv0l929(SGHJ
l piainuirrs,
J
vs. C `
LESTER DUNCKLEE, ET AL., r AUGUST 4, 2005 i
Defendants. `
STIPULATION TO DISMISS R
The plaintiff, Heidi Cannon and the defendants Lester
Duncklee, Brian Schneider and Michael Peckham, stipulate thai
this case may be dismissed as to all parties with prejudice nd
without costs or fees awarded to any party. 3
PLAINTIFF, HEIDI CANNON . DEFENDANT, LESTER DUNCKLEJ l
Heid Cannon, pro se Rhonda T in
Federal Bar No: ct 07755Q
Robinson & Cole, LLP ;
One Commercial Plaza
Hartford, CT 06103
DEFENDANTS, BRIAN SCHNEIDE.
an§§iiCHAEL PECKHAM
BY 'WM _
Scott M. Karsten
Federal Bar No.: ct05277 .
Karsten & Dorman, LLC T
29 South Main Street
west Hartford, CT 06107
;·;2< H /5/ T A ,
f
`- " n.: U fil gi • ATTORNEYS AT LAW. i
1 521-4800 • FAX (860) 5210500 · Jums Nc. 24030 \