Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. I' Case 3:02-cv-01929-SRU D0cument106 Filed 07/15/2005 Page10f3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ,¤ 7 gage I
Im I I KI I
STEVE§l§IiNE§f;nd HEIDI CANNON : 3:02 CVOIQQQMERMI {5 F3]2:5O 3
v. ; °’ I {I.I.€?.I,I3I5?fI
LESTER DUNCKLEE, ET AL : JULY ll, 2005 INI/IW I
defendants I I
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY I
I
Pursuant to FRCVP 6 and Local Rule 7(b), the plaintiffs hereby
move this court to extend the scheduling_order of January 31, 2005
( see exhibit ‘A', attached) so that all deadlines are extended thirty _
(30) days. The plaintiffs have conferred with opposing counsel by I
telephone, and Mr. Karsten and Mr. White have agreed to a thirty day
extension of the scheduling order deadlines. This is the first such
request for extension of time filed by the plaintiffs.
This extension of time is needed due to the fact that I
interrogatories and production requests were extended by order of this
court and schedules of opposing counsel have not coincided with that
of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs also need extended time to conduct I
depositions. I
- I
I
I
I r . i.. A I
I
I
I
;i1;;;;;i;;;;Z;;i;;I;;;;;;;i;;;;;;;;;i;;II;I;I;I;;;;IIIIZZIZ222ZZ;Z;:=====———»——e-I——-==e=;
_ NKI—whkfEa—gm`W—vi""—`“"_"`vvv-r~—e———~»—e—II`n_L_L__w_p

_
-

_"— rr—r———~»———IIII` I ‘
. I. `#—*`—a_k“——_k`—I_M"I_""""v—tvvv-~—s—~»——-II.I.Ii_L____p_




' Case 3:02-cv-01929-SRU Document 106 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 2 of 3
1
THE PLAINTIFFS
1
/ —
` 1
#7 / 1 1
x
STEVEN P. MILNER 1
_ EO BOX 25
STONINGTON, CT 06378 \
860-599-2930
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy_of the foregoing was mailed postage paid l
on July 14, 2005, to the following:
Scott Karsten K
Karsten and Dorman, LLC
29..51.. Main. sr. 1
W. Hartford, CT 06107
Jeff White 1
Rhonda Tobin 2. ““ _
Robinson and Cole, LLP / Q
280 Trumbull St. _
Hartford, CT 06103 STEVEN MILNER
1
1
t 1
1
1
1
_____1


SIRSD Dlsmct Vcrsloll L3 I https://ecfctd.circ2.dcn/cgi·bin/Dispatch.p|?67484294(l¤1524(>
Case 3:02-cv-01929-SRU Document 106 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 3 of 3
Other Ordersldudgments
'3:t)2—cv—Ol 929-SRU Milner, et al v. Duncklee, et al R
l
U.S. District Court
District of Connecticut =
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was received from Sbalbi, B. entered on 2/2/2005 at 1:15 PM EST and tiled
on 2/2/2005
Case Name: Milner, et al v. Duncklee, et al
Case Number: 3:02-cv-1929 -
Filer:
Document Number: 92 l
Docket Text: {
ELECTRONIC ENDORSEMENT ORDER. THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE THE COURT WILL
ISSUE. ORDER re [91] Report of Rule 26(I`) Planning Meeting. Report Approved. Discovery shall be
completed by 7/1 1/05 and dispositive motions shall be filed by 9/5/05. Signed by Judge Stefan R.
Underhill on 2/2/05. (Sbalbi, B.) 1
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

3:02-cv-1929 Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Scott M. Karsten [email protected], [email protected]
David S. Samuels [email protected], [email protected]
Rhonda J. Tobin [email protected], [email protected] X
3:02-cv-1929 Notice will be delivered by other means to: \
Heidi Cannon I
P.O. Box 25 =
Stonington, CT 06378 .
l
Steven Milner ‘
PO. Box 25 i
Stonington, CT 06378 l
l
__,,. ( I {
4; 2< H /5/ T A _
i
I OH 212/2005 me rm R