Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

..;.....-——J—-·-..........;--t.--·--....—
g V.`_ _é_;__m____ l
ll Case 3:02-cv-01929-SRU D0cument10O Filed 05/16/2005 Page1of3 l
I l
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
STEVEN MILNER and HEIDI CANNON ; 3:02CVO1929(sRU) I
V. : ,;: gg -
;-.;a;s»> 5*4 ·
LESTER DUNCKLEE, ET AL : MAY CL3, EE W
·-( I
§§ a F I
PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT;;: I> §$? ]
SCHNEIDER AND PECKHAWS ggcczg J: @
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Sig? QA E
——· I
The plaintiff’s were notified by phone on May 12, 2005, that
I
defendant's Schneider and Peckham intend to file a Motion for
Extension of Time to answer the plaintiff’s interrogatories dated I
December 6, 2004. The plaintiffs have attempted to confer with the
defendants by phone and letter (see exhibit A attached)requesting
compliance with the interrogatories. Since that time the defendant's
have been granted two extensions of time to respond to
interrogatories. The defendant’s have not responded to the plaintiffs
since the last extension of April 30, 2005.
I
The plaintiffs hereby object to the defendant's Motion to
Extension of Time as there is no viable reason to grant their Motion. j
I
The defendant’s Motion causes undue delay and interferes with the
judicial process. Pursuant to FRCVP Rule 37(d), the plaintiffs request `
that this court sanction the defendant's as it deems just. i
I



1
A 1 Case 3:02-cv-01929-SRU Document 100 Filed 05/16/2005 Page 2 of 3
I 1
THE PLAINTIFFS
...-- /7 I
H,. I
`
(STEVEN MILNER 1
‘ PO BOX 25 ·
STONINGTON, CT 06378 _
860—599—2930 I f
1
CERTIFICATION 1
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed and *
faxed on May l3, 2005 to the following: 1
ff A
Scott Karsten y;%?%;> é5;//1; I.
29 South Main_St. “,» ff "Z; 1
W. Hartford, CT 06107 STEVEN MILNER
Rhonda Tobin
Robinaon and Cole
280 Trumbull St.
Hartford, CT 06103 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1

Case 3:02-cv-01929-SRU Document 100 Filed 05/16/2005 Page 3 of 3
May 11, 2005 1
1
Atty. Scott Karsten 1
29 South Main St. 5
W. Hartford, CT 06107 1
1
re: Milner and Cannon v. Duncklee, et al 1
Dear Mr. Karsten,
Please let me know within five days whether or not you intend to
have your clients answer our interrogatories. As you are aware, the \
time to answer has run past the April 30th extension.
Please be aware if your clients fail to answer, we will take
appropriate steps under the rules with the court. Under Rule 33 they 1
I
must answer those interrogatories which are not objected to. ‘
Thank you. I I
_ 1
1
1
Yours truly, 1
-1-». yy *
-/I- 1- Nu /6
4/ ’ #4-* 1
N/Steven P. Milner
PO Box 25 y
Stonington, CT 06378
860—599—2930 1
1
1U. ¤tr~u» 5: ·r~v tt. A I
<" . .
1