Free Plea Agreement - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 91.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: July 1, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 738 Words, 4,712 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9144/10.pdf

Download Plea Agreement - District Court of Delaware ( 91.2 kB)


Preview Plea Agreement - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-mj-00137-MPT Document 10 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 1 of 3
Filed in Opeth ccurl i¤l30{OS @
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff, g
v. g Case N0. 04-l37M MPT
MARLENE ANN WRIGHT, g
Defendant. l
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF PLEA AGREEMENT
Pursuant to discussions between the United States of America, by and through its attorneys,
Colm F. Connolly, United States Attomey for the District of Delaware, and Adam Salivat, Assistant
United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and the defendant, MARLENE ANN VVRIGHT,
by and through her attomey, Christopher S. Koyste, Esquire, the following agreement is hereby
entered into by the respective parties:
l. The defendant shall plead guilty to Count One of an Information charging her with
a misdemeanor violation of Title IS, United States Code, Section 1012. This offense carries a
maximum penalty of one year imprisonment, a $100,000 fine, one year of supervised release,
restitution, or any and all of the above, and a special assessment of $25.
2. The defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently admits the following facts:
The defendant did knowingly and willfully, and with intent to defraud the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, falsely certified income statements that she submitted between
November l999 and July 2003 for the puipose of receiving federal Section 8 rental assistance. As
a result of the defendant’s false certifications, the defendant received at least $l0,000 in federal

Case 1:04-mj-00137-MPT Document 10 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 2 of 3
Section 8 rental assistance payments to which defendant was not entitled had defendant truthfully
reported her income during the foregoing time period.
3. Ifthe Court orders the defendant to pay restitution to the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, or as the Department may direct such restitution to be made,
the defendant agrees that the appropriate amount of restitution is $10,000.
4. The defendant also agrees to pay the $25 special assessment on the day of
sentencing.
5. The United States agrees to a two-level reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(a),
provided that the United States does not subsequently learn of conduct by the defendant
inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility.
6. The defendant recognizes that the Sentencing Court, in exercising its discretion,
will consider the federal sentencing guidelines and other factors bearing on an appropriate i
sentence pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 355 3(a). The defendant further
understands that the Government will recommend that the Sentencing Court impose a sentence
consistent with the sentencing range recommended by the federal sentencing guidelines. The
defendant recognizes that the final detemtination of the defendant’s sentence will be made by the
Sentencing Court. The defendant further understands that the Sentencing Court is not bound by
any stipulations or recommendations of the parties. The defendant agrees that she will not be
allowed to withdraw her guilty plea because the Court calculates the guidelines differently than
she expects, or imposes a sentence greater than what she expects, or imposes a sentence contrary
to any stipulation of the parties or recommendation of her attorney.
2

Case 1:04-mj-00137-MPT Document 10 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 3 of 3
7. The parties reserve the right to defend the probation of ticer’s findings at the
sentencing hearing and to defend the sentencing court’s rulings at any subsequent proceedings,
including an appeal. The parties realize that the Court is not bound by any stipulations and/or
recommendations made bythe parties.
8. It is further agreed by the undersigned panics that this Memorandum supersedes
all prior promises, representations, and statements of the parties; that this Memorandum may be
modified only in writing signed by all the parties; and, that any and all promises, representations,
and statements made prior to or after this Memorandum are null and void and have no effect
whatsoever.
‘ COLM F. CONNOLLY
__.p ,i V, . United States Attomey
4 , Q By: 1 -
stopher S. Koyste, Esquire Adam Safwat
Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attomey
‘ • .
. if
E -t' · In ·-i
='. · if
a ne Ann ` rig t }
Defendant
Dated: é ’ , 2005
»i· »z· »t·
AND NOW, this QV day of Z , 2005, the foregoing
Memorandum of Plea Agreement is hereby (accepted) (rejected) by this Court.
,.-·;; _;g·¥ ·
“ r.- ,.4(L..»[.. _
HON LE MARY P :/V HYNGE
Unite tes Magistrate Judge
District of Delaware
3