Exhibit No. 10
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
ERIK B. STANFORD, an individual, and PATRICIA KOZMINSKI, an individual, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation,dba UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED OF DELAWARE, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive Defendants. |
CASE NO. BC294282 Assigned to the Honorable Anthony J. Mohr [Original Complaint Filed: April 21, 2003] STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CLAIMS |
I. This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement of Class Action Claims (Settlement, Stipulation, or Agreement) is made by Erik Stanford and Patricia Kozminski (Named Plaintiffs) on behalf of themselves and each of the other Plaintiffs as defined herein, on the one hand, and the defendant United Retail Incorporated (United Retail), on the other hand, in the action pending in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Superior Court), Case No. BC 294282 (Class Action or Action), and subject to the approval of the Superior Court. The Class Members (Class Members or Class) consist of all Plaintiffs who do not properly elect to exclude themselves from the terms of this Agreement. The Settlement Class Members consist of all Class Members who submit a Claim Form/FLSA Consent Form that is approved for payment under the terms of this Stipulation.
II. Class Certification. Solely for purposes of this Settlement, the Class Members and United Retail (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Parties) stipulate and agree to define three settlement classes as follows:
1. all Store Managers employed by United Retail in California at any time between April 21, 1999 through January 31, 2005, for the claims of overtime, meal periods and bonuses (Class No. 1);
2. all Co-Managers employed by United Retail in California at any time between April 21, 1999 through January 31, 2004, for the bonuses claim (Class No. 2); and
3. all full time employees employed by United Retail in California at any time between April 21, 1999 and December 31, 2004 for vacation claims and the personal day (also known as PTO) claims (Class No. 3).
The Parties stipulate and agree to the certification of the Class Action for purposes of this Settlement only. Should for whatever reason the Settlement not become final, the fact that the Parties were willing to stipulate to class certification as part of the Settlement shall have no bearing on, and shall not be admissible in connection with, the issue of whether a class should be certified in a non-settlement context in this Action and shall have no bearing on, and shall not be admissible in connection with, the issue of whether a class should be certified in any other lawsuit. United Retail expressly reserves its right to oppose class certification should this Settlement not become final.
III. Procedural History. The Action was originally filed by Erik Stanford in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles on April 21, 2003. Plaintiff Kozminski joined the action upon the filing of a First Amended Complaint on February 4, 2004.
Named Plaintiffs have prepared and attached hereto as Exhibit 5 a Second Amended Complaint asserting federal claims and redefining the vacation claims. The Second Amended Complaint will be deemed filed on the date of entry of the Preliminary Approval Order (as defined below).
IV. Investigation in the Class Action. The Parties have conducted significant investigation of the facts and law during the prosecution of this Action. Such discovery and investigations have included: the exchange of information pursuant to discovery; the review of over 65,000 pages of United Retail records; depositions of representatives of United Retail; surveys of putative Class Members; numerous meetings and conferences between representatives of the Parties; and interviews of numerous potential witnesses. Counsel for the Parties have further investigated the applicable law regarding the alleged claims of Plaintiffs and potential defenses thereto, and the damages claimed by Plaintiffs. In pertinent part, the investigation has yielded the following. The Action generally alleges that United Retail: (1) failed to pay the Store Managers overtime and failed to provide them unpaid meal periods; (2) improperly deducted certain amounts from bonuses for Store Managers and Co-Managers; and (3) failed to pay or carry forward accrued vacation and personal time off (PTO). Plaintiffs are demanding various amounts for wages, penalties, interest, attorneys fees, and other damages. United Retail contends that the Store Managers are exempt from California state overtime requirements and California state meal period requirements by virtue of one or more exemptions recognized under California law. The Parties disagree on the number of hours actually worked by the Plaintiffs and on whether Plaintiffs were permitted to take meal periods. United Retail also disputes the legal and factual basis for the other claims for bonuses and vacation/PTO and contends that class recovery is inappropriate for any of the claims. After investigation, counsel for Plaintiffs (Plaintiffs Counsel) have concluded that there is a significant risk that some of the Plaintiffs may have been, for at least some part of the Class Period, exempt from overtime requirements under California state law, but they do not believe all of the Plaintiffs were for the entire Class Period exempt from overtime requirements under California state law. Likewise, United Retail has concluded that there is a significant risk that some of the Plaintiffs may have been, for at least some part of the Class Period, improperly classified as exempt from overtime requirements under California state law, but it does not believe all of the Plaintiffs were for the entire Class Period improperly classified as exempt from overtime requirements under California state law.
Plaintiffs Counsel investigated the claim that California Co-Managers did not receive the meal-periods to which they are entitled and now believe that the claim does not have any factual basis. The claim of the Co-Managers for meal period violations is being dismissed with prejudice by this Stipulation.
V. Benefits of Settlement to Class Members. Named Plaintiffs recognize the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to continue the litigation against United Retail through trial and through any possible appeals. Named Plaintiffs have also taken into account the uncertainty and risk of the outcome of further litigation, and the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Named Plaintiffs are also aware of the burdens of proof necessary to establish class certification and liability for the claims asserted in the Action (the Claims or Class Action Claims), United Retails defenses thereto, and the difficulties in establishing damages for the Plaintiffs. Named Plaintiffs have also taken into account the extensive settlement negotiations conducted. The negotiations included full days of mediation and direct negotiations between the Parties and ended in a settlement on December 29, 2004 signed by both sides. Based on the foregoing, Named Plaintiffs have determined that the Settlement set forth in this Agreement is a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement, and is in the best interests of the Plaintiffs.
VI. United Retails Reasons for Settlement. United Retail has concluded that any further defense of this litigation would be protracted and expensive for the Parties. Substantial amounts of time, energy and resources of United Retail have been expended and, unless this Settlement is made, will continue to be devoted to the defense of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs. United Retail has, therefore, agreed to settle in the manner and upon the terms set forth in this Agreement to put to rest the Claims as set forth in the Class Action.
VII. United Retails Denial of Wrongdoing. United Retail has denied and continues to deny each of the claims and contentions alleged by Plaintiffs in the Action. United Retail has repeatedly asserted and continues to assert defenses thereto, and has expressly denied and continues to deny any wrongdoing or legal liability arising out of any of the facts or conduct alleged in the Action. United Retail also has denied and continues to deny the allegations that the Plaintiffs have suffered damage; that United Retail misclassified any of the Plaintiffs as exempt from overtime and meal period requirements; that United Retail failed to pay any of the Plaintiffs for all overtime to which they were entitled; that United Retail failed to provide any of the Plaintiffs unpaid meal periods; that United Retail improperly deducted amounts from bonuses; that United Retail failed to pay or carry forward accrued vacation or PTO to which they were entitled; that United Retail engaged in any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business practices; that United Retail engaged in any wrongful conduct as alleged in the Action; or that the Plaintiffs were harmed by the conduct alleged in the Action. Neither this Agreement, nor any document referred to or contemplated herein, nor any action taken to carry out this Agreement may be construed as, or may be used as an admission, concession or indication by or against United Retail of any fault, wrongdoing or liability whatsoever.
VIII. Plaintiffs Claims. Plaintiffs have claimed and continue to claim that the Released Claims (as defined below) have merit and give rise to liability on the part of United Retail. Neither this Agreement nor any documents referred to herein, or any action taken to carry out this Agreement may be construed as or may be used as an admission by or against the Plaintiffs or Class Counsel as to the merits or lack thereof of the claims asserted.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Named Plaintiffs on behalf of the Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and United Retail, on the other hand, and subject to the approval of the Superior Court, that the Class Action is hereby being compromised and settled pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and that upon the Effective Date (as defined below) the Class Action shall be settled, subject to the recitals set forth hereinabove which by this reference become an integral part of this Agreement and subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. Effective Date. As used in this Settlement, Effective Date means the date by which this Settlement is finally approved as provided herein and the Superior Courts Final Judgment (Final Judgment or Judgment) becomes final. For purposes of this paragraph, the Superior Courts Final Judgment becomes final upon the latter of: (i) the date of final affirmance on an appeal of the Final Judgment; (ii) the expiration of the time for a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Final Judgment and, if certiorari be granted, the date of final affirmance of the Final Judgment following review pursuant to that grant; (iii) the date of final dismissal of any appeal from the Final Judgment or the final dismissal of any proceeding on certiorari to review the Final Judgment; or (iv) if no appeal is filed, the expiration date of the time for the filing or noticing of any appeal from the Superior Courts Final Judgment.
2. Full Investigation. Named Plaintiffs have fully investigated the factual and legal bases for the causes of action asserted in the Class Action. United Retail has denied that it misclassified the Plaintiffs as exempt from overtime laws or meal period requirements, failed to pay Plaintiffs for all overtime due, failed to provide Plaintiffs with required meal periods, improperly deducted amounts from bonuses or failed to pay or carry forward accrued vacation or PTO. As a result of their investigation, Named Plaintiffs continue to believe that United Retail misclassified at least some of the Store Managers, unlawfully failed to pay overtime to those Store Managers, failed to pay or carry forward vacation and PTO and improperly deducted amounts from bonuses. Given the disagreement between the Parties as to the viability of the claims raised by the Plaintiffs in the Class Action Claims, the Parties believe the Settlement provided for herein is a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement.
3. (a) Release As To All Class Members. As of the Effective Date, the Class Members, including the Named Plaintiffs, release United Retail Incorporated and each of its past or present officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, principals, representatives, accountants, auditors, consultants, insurers and reinsurers, and its and their respective successors and predecessors in interest, subsidiaries, affiliates, parent companies and attorneys and all of their respective officers, directors, employees, administrators, fiduciaries, trustees and agents (the Released Parties), from the Released Claims. For purposes of this Agreement, the Released Claims are defined as:
all claims, demands, rights, liabilities, and causes of action of every nature and description whatsoever, | |
known or unknown, asserted or that might have been asserted, | |
whether in tort, contract, or for violation of any state or federal constitution, statute, rule or regulation, including state wage and hour laws and the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act, | |
whether for economic damages, accrued vacation time, accrued PTO, non-economic damages, restitution, penalties or liquidated damages, | |
arising out of, relating to, or in connection with: |
(1) any and all facts, transactions, events, policies, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act, which are or could be the basis of claims that United Retail did not comply with all state and federal wage and hour laws related to any claims: (a) that United Retail did not pay the Store Managers all amounts due for work that was performed by the Store Managers for United Retail; (b) that United Retail failed to provide unpaid meal periods; (c) that United Retail improperly deducted amounts from bonuses for Store Managers and Co-Managers; (d) that United Retail failed to pay or carry forward all accrued and unused vacation and PTO; (e) that United Retail failed to contribute amounts to the United Retail Group, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan based on the amounts claimed in this Class Action for hours worked, overtime, vacation, PTO, meal periods and deductions from bonuses; or (f) that United Retail owes wages, penalties, interest, attorneys fees or other damages of any kind based on a failure to comply with any state wage and hour laws related to the foregoing, at any times on or before the last day of the Class Period (whether based on California state wage and hour law, contract, or otherwise) including, but not limited to, penalties based upon Labor Code Sections 201, 202, 203, 204, 210, 226.7, 558, 1199, and 2699; and/or
(2) the causes of action asserted in the Class Action, including any and all claims for alleged failure to pay overtime, for alleged failure to provide unpaid meal periods, for improper deductions from bonuses, for alleged failure to pay or carry forward vacation and PTO, and, as related to the foregoing, for alleged unlawful, unfair and/or fraudulent business practices under California Business and Professions Code § 17200, et seq. For the avoidance of doubt, the Class Members shall not be entitled to carry forward any vacation time or PTO that shall have accrued prior to January 1, 2004.
The claims that the Co-Managers were not provided with proper meal periods is being dismissed with prejudice.
The Released Claims include any unknown claims that arise out of or relate to violations by United Retail of state or federal wage and hour law that are described above and that the Class Members do not know or suspect to exist in their favor at the time of the release, which, if known by them, might have affected their settlement with, and release of, the Released Parties or might have affected their decision not to object to this Settlement. With respect to the Released Claims, the Class Members stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, the Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall have, expressly waived and relinquished, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, or any other similar provision under federal or state law, which Section provides:
A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor.
The Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those they now know or believe to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all of the Released Claims, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts.
The Class Members agree not to sue or otherwise make a claim against any of the Released Parties that is in any way related to the Released Claims.
(b) Release As to Settlement Class Members. As of the Effective Date, all Settlement Class Members, including the Named Plaintiffs, release the Released Parties from any claims based on federal wage and hour laws, in addition to releasing the Released Parties from the Released Claims as outlined above in subsection (a).
4. General Release By Named Plaintiffs Only.
In addition to the release made by the Class Members set forth in Paragraph 3 hereof, the Named Plaintiffs, as of the Effective Date, make the additional following general release of all claims, known or unknown.
The Named Plaintiffs release the Released Parties from all claims, demands, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature and description whatsoever, known or unknown, asserted or that might have been asserted, whether in tort, contract, or for violation of any state or federal statute, rule or regulation arising out of, relating to, or in connection with any act or omission by or on the part of any of the Released Parties committed or omitted prior to the execution hereof. (The release set forth in this Paragraph 4 shall be referred to hereinafter as the General Release).
The General Release includes any unknown claims the Named Plaintiffs do not know or suspect to exist in their favor at the time of the General Release, which, if known by them, might have affected their settlement with, and release of, the Released Parties by the Named Plaintiffs or might have affected their decision not to object to this Settlement or the General Release.
With respect to the General Release, the Named Plaintiffs stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, the Named Plaintiffs shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall have, expressly waived and relinquished, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, or any other similar provision under federal or state law, which provides:
A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor.
The Named Plaintiffs may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those he/she now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the General Release, but the Named Plaintiffs upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all of the claims released pursuant to the General Release whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, which now exist, or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts.
5. Settlement Fund. The term Settlement Fund shall refer to the funds that United Retail will distribute in accordance with Paragraph 6 below. The amount of the Settlement Fund depends on the number of valid and timely claims submitted by the Class Members.
6. Allocation of Settlement Fund. The Settlement Fund has a maximum potential value of $2,212,250 (which includes any interest). The Settlement Fund shall be allocated among these elements: (a) the total payments to the Plaintiffs of the Gross Settlement Amounts less deductions as explained in paragraph 7 below (the potential total Gross Settlement Amounts equal $1,604,187 and shall collectively be referred to as the Payout Fund); (b) an Enhancement (as hereinafter defined) to the Named Plaintiffs (in the amount of $10,000 each); (c) the Fees Award (as hereinafter defined) to Class Counsel (in the amount of $553,063 for fees and $10,000 for costs) and (d) the costs of administration (estimated at $25,000). The Payout Fund is divided as follows:
7. Plan of Allocation for Payment to Settlement Class Members. In accordance with Paragraph 9 below, United Retail shall pay the Settlement Awards (as hereinafter defined) to the Settlement Class Members in accordance with the following eligibility and settlement formula requirements:
8. Fees Award and Enhancement to Named Plaintiff
9. Payment Schedule. The Settlement Awards, Fees Award and Enhancement to the named Plaintiffs shall be paid in accordance with the following schedule:
10. Responsibilities of United Retail. United Retail shall:
11. Operation of the Settlement Fund.
12. Change of Store Managers Method of Compensation; No Injunctive Relief. As part of this Settlement, United Retail shall not be required to enter into any consent decree, nor shall United Retail be required to agree to any provision for injunctive relief. United Retail changed its Store Managers to an hourly basis of compensation before January 31, 2005.
13. Notice/Approval of Settlement and Settlement Implementation. As part of this Settlement, the Parties agree to the following procedures for obtaining preliminary Superior Court approval of the Settlement, certifying a Settlement Class, notifying Settlement Class Members, obtaining final Superior Court approval of the Settlement and processing the settlement payments:
(1) Claims Administrator. Rust Inc., located at 501 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55402, Telephone: (612) 359-2000, Fax: (612) 359-2050 (hereinafter "Rust"), or such other entity upon whom the Parties mutually agree, shall be retained to serve as Claims Administrator. Subject to United Retail's exercise of its discretion to do these tasks itself as set forth in Paragraphs 10 and 11, the Claims Administrator shall be responsible for preparing, printing and mailing the Notice (attached as Exhibit 1 hereto) and the Claim Form (attached as Exhibit 2 hereto) as directed by the Court to the Class Members, receiving and reviewing the Claim Forms submitted by Class Members to determine eligibility for payment as a Settlement Class Member and the amount of any such payment, along with the amount of all payroll tax deductions to be withheld, keeping track of opt outs, drafting and mailing Settlement Award checks to Settlement Award Class Members, and for such other tasks as the Parties mutually agree or the Superior Court orders the Claims Administrator to perform. The Parties each represent they do not have any financial interest in Rust or otherwise have a relationship with Rust that could create a conflict of interest. United Retail shall be responsible for paying all agreed Claims Administrator's Administration Fees upon presentation of invoices by the Claims Administrator. United Retail shall also be responsible for paying over to the Claims Administrator at such times as requested by the Claims Administrator those amounts necessary to enable the Claims Administrator to pay Settlement Class Members, if those payments are made by the Claims Administrator rather than United Retail | |
(2) Notice By First-Class Mail. Within 20 days after entry of the Preliminary Approval Order as provided herein, the Claims Administrator shall send a copy of a Notice of Pendency and Settlement of Class Action; Settlement Hearing; and Claim, Consent, and Exclusion Procedures ("Notice") (attached as Exhibit 1 hereto), together with a Claim Form (attached as Exhibit 2 hereto), to all Class Members via First Class regular U.S. mail. The Claims Administrator will utilize the most current mailing address information for Class Members as provided by United Retail to the Claims Administrator from United Retail's payroll records. Any Notices returned to the Claims Administrator as non-delivered before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline Date specified below, shall be sent to the forwarding address affixed thereto. If no forwarding address is provided, then the Claims Administrator shall promptly attempt to determine a correct address using a single computer or other search using the social security number of the individual involved. In the event the procedures in this paragraph are followed and no forwarding address is located, or the intended recipient of a Notice still does not receive the Notice, the intended recipient shall remain a Settlement Class Member and will be bound by all terms of the Settlement and any Final Judgment entered by the Superior Court if the Settlement is approved by the Superior Court. |
(1) Procedure for Objecting. The Notice shall provide that Class Members who wish to object to the Settlement must file with the Superior Court and serve on counsel for the Parties a written statement objecting to the Settlement. Such written statement must be filed with the Superior Court and served on counsel for the Parties no later than forty-five days after the initial Notice is mailed (the "Objection/Exclusion Deadline Date"). No Class Member shall be entitled to be heard at the Final Settlement Approval Hearing (whether individually or through separate counsel) or to object to the Settlement, and no written objections or briefs submitted by any Class Member shall be received or considered by the Superior Court at the Final Settlement Approval Hearing, unless written notice of the Class Member's intention to appear at the Final Settlement Approval Hearing, and copies of any written objections or briefs, shall have been filed with the Superior Court and served on counsel for the Parties on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline Date. Class Members who fail to file and serve timely written objections in the manner specified above shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from making any objection (whether by appeal or otherwise) to the Settlement. | |
(2) Procedure for Requesting Exclusion. The Notice shall provide that Class Members who wish to exclude themselves from the Class must submit a written statement requesting exclusion from the Class on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline Date. Such written request for exclusion must contain the name, address, telephone number and Social Security number of the person requesting exclusion and the location and years of his or her employment by United Retail, must be returned by mail to the Claims Administrator at a specified address and must be postmarked on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline Date. The date of the postmark on the return mailing envelope shall be the exclusive means used to determine whether a request for exclusion has been timely submitted. Any Plaintiff who opts out of the Class will not be entitled to any recovery under the Settlement and will not be bound by the Settlement or have any right to object, appeal or comment thereon. Class Members who fail to submit a valid and timely request for exclusion on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline Date shall be bound by all terms of the Settlement and any Final Judgment entered in this Class Action if the Settlement is approved by the Superior Court, regardless of whether they have otherwise requested exclusion from the Settlement. No later than fourteen (14) days before the Final Settlement Approval Hearing, the Claims Administrator shall provide United Retail's Counsel and Plaintiffs' Counsel with a complete list of all Class Members who have timely requested exclusion from the Class, along with the number and gross settlement amount of valid Claim Forms received. |
14. Privacy of Documents and Information. Plaintiffs and their counsel agree that none of the documents and information provided to them by United Retail shall be used for any purpose other than prosecution of this Class Action. United Retail agrees that the identities of those Class Members who submit Claim Forms will not be disclosed to those Class Members direct supervisors at United Retail.
15. No Effect on Employee Benefits. The Settlement Awards and Enhancement paid to the Named Plaintiffs or other Settlement Class Members shall not have any effect on the eligibility for, or calculation of, any of the employee benefits (e.g. vacations, holiday pay, retirement plans, etc.) of the respective Named Plaintiffs or Settlement Class Members. The Parties agree that any Settlement Awards and Enhancement Awards to Settlement Class Members under the terms of this Agreement do not represent any modification of Settlement Class Members previously credited hours of service or other eligibility criteria under any employee pension benefit plan or employee welfare benefit plan sponsored by United Retail. Further, any Settlement Awards or Enhancement hereunder shall not be considered compensation in any year for purposes of determining eligibility for, or benefit accrual within, an employee pension benefit plan or employee welfare benefit plan sponsored by United Retail.
16. No Admission By the Parties. United Retail and the Released Parties deny any and all claims alleged in this Class Action and deny all wrongdoing whatsoever. This Agreement is not a concession or admission, and shall not be used against United Retail or any of the Released Parties as an admission or indication with respect to any claim of any fault, concession or omission by United Retail or any of the Released Parties. Whether or not the Settlement is finally approved, neither the Settlement, nor any document, statement, proceeding or conduct related to this Agreement, nor any reports or accounts thereof, shall in any event be:
17. Exhibits and Headings. The terms of this Agreement include the terms set forth in any attached Exhibits 1-5, which are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Any Exhibits to this Agreement are an integral part of the Settlement. The descriptive headings of any paragraphs or sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and do not constitute a part of this Agreement.
18. Interim Stay of Proceedings. The Parties agree to hold all proceedings in the Class Action, except such proceedings necessary to implement and complete the Settlement, in abeyance pending the Final Settlement Approval Hearing to be conducted by the Superior Court.
19. Amendment or Modification. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by counsel for all Parties or their successors-in-interest.
20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any attached Exhibits constitute the entire agreement among these Parties, and no oral or written representations, warranties or inducements have been made to any Party concerning this Agreement or its Exhibits other than the representations, warranties and covenants contained and memorialized in such documents. United Retail shall not be required as part of the Settlement to modify or eliminate any of its personnel, compensation or payroll practices, or adopt any new personnel, compensation or payroll practices.
21. Authorization to Enter Into Settlement Agreement. Counsel for all Parties warrant and represent they are expressly authorized by the Parties whom they represent to negotiate this Agreement and to take all appropriate action required or permitted to be taken by such Parties pursuant to this Agreement to effectuate its terms, and to execute any other documents required to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties and their counsel will cooperate with each other and use their best efforts to effect the implementation of the Settlement. In the event the Parties are unable to reach agreement on the form or content of any document needed to implement the Settlement, or on any supplemental provisions that may become necessary to effectuate the terms of this Settlement, the Parties may seek the assistance of the Superior Court to resolve such disagreement. The persons signing this Agreement on behalf of United Retail represent and warrant that they are authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of United Retail.
22. Binding on Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors or assigns of the Parties hereto, as previously defined.
23. California Law Governs. All terms of this Agreement and the Exhibits hereto shall be governed by and interpreted according to the laws of the State of California.
24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts. All executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument provided that counsel for the Parties to this Agreement shall exchange among themselves original signed counterparts.
25. This Settlement is Fair, Adequate and Reasonable. The Parties believe this Settlement is a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement of this Class Action and have arrived at this Settlement in arms-length negotiations, taking into account all relevant factors, present and potential. This Settlement was reached after extensive negotiations.
26. Jurisdiction of the Court. The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the terms of this Agreement and all orders and judgments entered in connection therewith, and the parties and their counsel hereto submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of interpreting, implementing and enforcing the settlement embodied in this Agreement and all orders and judgments entered in connection therewith.
27. Cooperation and Drafting. Each of the parties has cooperated in the drafting and preparation of this Agreement. Hence, in any construction made to this Agreement, the same shall not be construed against any of the parties.
28. Invalidity of Any Provision. Before declaring any provision of this Agreement invalid, the Court shall first attempt to construe the provisions valid to the fullest extent possible consistent with applicable precedents so as to define all provisions of this Agreement valid and enforceable.
29. Named Plaintiffs Waiver of Right to be Excluded and Object. The Named Plaintiffs agree to sign this Agreement and by signing this Agreement are bound by the terms herein stated and further agree not to request to be excluded from the Settlement Class and agree not to object to any of the terms of this Agreement. Non-compliance by any of the Named Plaintiffs with this paragraph shall be void and of no force or effect. Any such request for exclusion or objection shall therefore be void and of no force or effect.
30. Non-Disparagement. The Parties and their counsel agree not to disparage the settlement in any way. Named Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs counsel further agree not to disparage the Released Parties in any way.
NAMED PLAINTIFFS
DATED: March 10, 2005 | /s/ERIK STANFORD ERIK STANFORD |
DATED: March 10, 2005 | /s/PATRICIA KOZMINSKI PATRICIA KOZMINSKI |
CLASS COUNSEL
DATED: March 18, 2005 | HARRIS & KAUFMAN /s/WILLIAM HARRIS WILLIAM HARRIS |
DEFENDANT
DATED: March 17, 2005 | UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED By: /s/GEORGE R. REMETA Its: Chief Administrative Officer |
DEFENDANTS COUNSEL
DATED: March 17, 2005 | SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP /s/CHARLES F. BARKER CHARLES F. BARKER |
1. Class Notice
2. Claim Form/FLSA Consent Form
3. Preliminary Approval Order
4. Final Judgment
5. Second Amended Complaint
Name: | # STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT |
Type: | Stipulation and Settlement Agreement |
Date: | March 23, 2005 |
Company: | UNITED RETAIL GROUP INC/DE |
State: | Delaware |