Free Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cv-00361-JJF Document 27 Filed O9/O4/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY )
LICENSING, L.P., )
)
Plaintiff`, )
)
v. ) C.A. No. 07-361 (GMS)
)
COMCAST CORPORATION; COMCAST CABLE )
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; COMCAST OF NEW )
CASTLE COUNTY, LLC; COMCAST OF )
DELMARVA, INC.; COMCAST OF EASTERN )
SHORE, LLC; COMCAST OF CALIFORNIA II,
LLC; coMcAsT OF CALIFORNIA/COLORADO, I DEMAND FDR JUDY TRIAL
LLC; COMCAST OF ARKANSAS/FLORIDN )
LOUISIANA/MINNESOTA/MISSISSIPPI/ )
TENNESSEE, INC.; COMCAST OF COLORADO! )
PENNSYLVANIA/WEST VIRGINIA, LLC; )
COMCAST OF FLORIDA/ILLINOIS/MICHIGAN, )
INC.; COMCAST OF GARDEN STATE, L.P.;
COMCAST OF HOUSTON, LLC; GEICO )
CORPORATION; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES )
INSURANCE COMPANY; GEICO GENERAL )
INSURANCE COMPANY; GEICO INDEMNITY )
COMPANY; GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; XM )
SATELLITE RADIO HOLDINGS INC.; XM )
SATELLITE RADIO INC.; XM RADIO INC.; XM )
EQUIPMENT LEASING LLC; )
Defendants. g
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
DATES FOR BRIEFING ON GEICO’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
WHEREAS, on August 22, 2007, defendants GEICO Corporation; Government
Employees Insurance Company; GEICO General Insurance Company; GEICO Indemnity
Company; and GEICO Casualty Company (the “GEICO Def`endants”) filed and served a motion
to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement (the "Motion to Dismiss”);
{BMF·W0066905.}

Case 1 :07-cv-00361-JJF Document 27 Filed O9/O4/2007 Page 2 of 2
WHEREAS, plaintiff has requested an extension of time to tile and serve an opposition to
the Motion to Dismiss to allow it the additional time necessary to evaluate and respond to the
motion and to accommodate counsel’s schedule; and
WHEREAS, the GEICO Defendants have requested an extension of time to tile and serve
a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned, and
subject to the approval of the Court as follows:
1. Plaintiff may have until September 24, 2007, to tile and serve an opposition to the
GEICO Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; and
2. The GEICO Defendants may have until October 15, 2007, to file and serve a reply
in support of their Motion to Dismiss.
Boucnrmn MARGULES & FRIEDLANDER, P.A. Fox Rornscnito LLP
/s/ John M Seaman /s/ Francis G.X Pileggi
Andre G. Bouchard (#2504) Francis G.X. Pileggi (#2624)
John M. Seaman (#3868) 919 N. Market Street
222 Delaware Ave., Suite 1400 Suite 1300
Wilmington, DE 19801 Wilmington, DE 19801
302.573.35OO 302.655.3667
[email protected] fpileggi@,foxrothschild.com
j [email protected]
Attorneys for Defendants GEICO Corp.;
Attorneys for Plaintw Government Employees Insurance Company;
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P GEICO General Insurance Company; GEICO
Indemnity Company; and GEICO Casualty
Company
Dated: September 4, 2007
ORDER
SO ORDERED this day of September, 2007.
United States District Judge
{BMF·W006690S.} 2