Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cr-00038-JJF Document 24 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 3 `
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF Al\/IERICA, : I _
_ Plaintiff,
v. Criminal Action No. 07 -38 JJF E
I CHRISTIAN OREJUELA,
Defendant. U
I MOTION FOR A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE . I ·
- The United States, by and through Colm F. Cormolly, United States Attomey for the
District of Delaware, and Douglas E. McCa1m, Assistant United States Attorney for the District I
of Delaware, hereby moves the Court to set a scheduling conference in the above-captioned case
for the reasons set forth below. i
_ 1. The Grand Jury returned an Indictment against the defendant on March 15, 2007.
2. The defendant moved to suppress certain evidence on May 10, 2007.
3. I Ob September 20, 2007, after conducting an evidentiary hearing and reviewing post-
hearing briefing, the Court granted—in-part and denied-in-part the defendant’s motion.
4. There are no other pending motions. A ·

Case 1 :07-cr-00038-JJF Document 24 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully asks the Court to set a date for a scheduling
n conference in order to address the scheduling of trial in this matter. A proposed fonn of order is
attached for the Court’s convenience.
` _ Respectfully submitted,
I ` COLM F. CONNOLLY
United States Attorney
‘ Douglas . MCCRHD `
Assistant United States Attorney
1007 Orange Street, Suite 700 g
P.O. Box 2046 g
Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2046
DATED: September 20, 2007

I Case 1 :07-cr-00038-JJF Document 24 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : ‘
Plaintiff} I
v. Criminal Action No. 07 -38 HF
CHRISTIAN OREIUELA,
p Defendant.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this _ day of , 2007, that
1. A scheduling conference in this matter will be held on the ___ day of
at .m. in Courtroom 4B, J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844
King Street, Wilmington, Delaware;
2. Because the Court finds that a brief continuance in this matter to permit the Court
and the parties to meet and confer on the further scheduling of this case outweighs the interest of
the defendant and the public in a speedy trial, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time
between the date of this Order and the date of the scheduling conference are excluded Hom I
_ computation of the Speedy Trial Act in the interests of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). -
u r
_ _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE B