Free Probation Petition re Revocation of Supervised Release - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cr-00032-JJ F Document 13 Filed O9/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
The PROB 12
(Rev. 2/94)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Criminal Action No. 07CR00032-001(JJF)
)
Jeffrey C. Williams, )
)
Defendant. )
Petition on Probation and Supervised Release
COMES NOW Frank Kurzeknabe PROBATION OFFICER OF TI-IE COURT presenting an official report upon
the conduct and attitude of Jeffrey C. Williams who was placed on supervision by the Honorable Joseph J. Faman, Jr.
sitting in the court at Wilmington, Delaware on the l2th day of Jtgv, 2007 who fixed the period of supervision at three
years, and imposed the general terms and conditions theretofore adopted by the court and also imposed special conditions
and terms as follows:
Pay $100.00 special assessment.
Make restitution in the amount of $59,576.00.
Defendant shall provide the probation officer with access to any requested fmancial information.
Defendant shall make restitution payments form wages eamed while in prison in accordance with the Bureau of Prisons.
Defendant shall make a lump sum payment of one half of the restitution obligation within six months of commencing
the term of supervised release.
Any portion of the restitution that is not paid in full at the time of the defendant’s release from imprisonment shall
become a condition of supervision. While on supervised release, the defendant shall pay not less than $100.00 monthly
for restitution.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS:
(PLEASE SEE ATTACHED)
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER that a summons be issued for Jeffrey C. Williams and that he appear
before the Court for a Revocation Hearing to determine if he is in violation of the conditions of his supervised release.
ORDER OF COURT Respectfu@
Considered and ordered this K; day of_ { .
wz 2./ , 2008. U.S» robati n Officer
gv • Place Wilmington, Delaware
U. istri Judge
Date September 2, 2008

Case 1 :07-cr-00032-JJF Document 13 Filed O9/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
Re: Jeffrey C. Williams
07CR00032-001 (JJF)
Above probation officer has reason to believe that Jeffrey C. Williams has violated the terms and
conditions of his supervised release under such circumstances that may warrant revocation of his
supervised release. These conditions are:
SPECIAL CONDITION: "The defendant shall pay a $100.00 special assessment which is due
immediately."
EVIDENCE: The defendant commenced his term of supervised release on February 28, 2008. To
date the defendant has paid $25.00. That amount was received while the defendant was participating
in the Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. The defendant has not
submitted any payments during his present term of supervised release. The defendant has a $75.000
unpaid special assessment balance remaining to be paid
SPECIAL CONDITION: "The defendant shall make restitution in the amount of $59,576.00. The
defendant shall make a lump sum payment of one half ofthe restitution obligation within six months
of corrnnencing the term of supervised release. Any portion of the restitution that is not paid in full
at the time of the defendant’s release from imprisomnent shall become a condition of supervision.
While on supervised release, the defendant shall pay not less than $100.00 monthly for restitution.
EVIDENCE: The defendant commenced his term of supervised release on February 28, 2008. To
date the defendant has presented no restitution payments. During scheduled office visits on March
14, April 18, May 15, June 16, July 21 and August 7, 2008, the defendant assured the U. S. Probation
Officer that he would have the fmrds to satisfy his $29,788.00 obligation by August 28, 2008 as
ordered by the Court. Dtuing the June 16, 2008 office visit, the defendant specifically informed that
he would be taking out a loan in order to satisfy his pending August 28 restitution payment
requirement and that his wife would be the co-signer of that loan. On August 29, 2008, the defendant
appeared for s scheduled office visit which was designated to confirm that he has complied with his
August 28 restitution payment due date. During that office visit, the defendant informed that he did
not have the ordered payment and he could not provide any estimate as to when that payment would
be submitted. The defendant related that his cause for nonpayment was that he had no available
fturds.