Free Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 111.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 8, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 820 Words, 5,030 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35186/30.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Delaware ( 111.2 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00513-MPT Document 30 Filed 09/08/2005. Page 1 of 3
} I I l
. . I
Y i`
2 *
_ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1;
if it FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
,g ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE ) Q
; ll COMPANY, ) jc
S I >
~ i I T
l ., PACK AND PROCESS, INC. )
. : ) tj
} i é Plaintiffs, ) j ‘
I I >
( »·. ) casa na. 05-0022 (KAJ)
. . ) i
T MALY YAN, ) T;
— . > i
ig Defendant. ) t
I
l
i STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATION i
Q WHEREAS, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company ("St. Paul") filed an action against p
, Maly Yan for declaratory judgment on January 14, 2005 under Docket Number 05-0022 (KAJ), i I
and `i‘
I WHEREAS, on March 16, 2005, an Amended Complaint was filed in this action wherein
; Pack and Process, Inc. ("Pack & Process") was named as an additional plaintiff`, and p;
i . Iii.
E, , WHEREAS, Maly Yan and others filed an action on February 23, 2005 against St. Paul I
A and Pack 8; Process in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 5 .
. ("Pcnnsylvania Action"), and
WHEREAS, by order ofthe United States District Court for the Eastern District of A
I ?.§ Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Action was transferred to this Court and docketed here on July i
21, 2005 under Docket Number 05-005i3 (SLR) (see attached copy of Judge Giles' transfer i
order), and l·_
WHEREAS the parties to the above-referenced civil actions believe that consolidation ot`
_1 the actions would he in their best interests and would iimher serve the interests of judicial ~
{ · economy and efficiency,
I Li
DEASEY. MAHONEY 8: BENDER, LTD. ;
SUITE 1300 • 1800 JOHN F. KENNEDY BOULEVARD • PHILADELPHPA, PA I9103-2978
T I l
`

Case 1 :05-cv-00513-MPT Document 30 Filed 09/08/2005_ Page 2 0f 3
? IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED bythe panics to the abovcwefcrenced ‘
l l civil actions that the action dockcted at 05-00513 shall be consolidated with the action docketed .
' il at 05-0022 for u oses of disoovc , case mana cment and trial. A
} P [P YY S E
E I!
1, E; ld I f Mt 7 rn .
Josep K. oury, Esquir 0-;;,) 7,;;,5 J s B Burns, Esquire ,,_
Local Counsel for Plainti Co n or Plaintiffs m .
l it . i t - * ·/ s
{ v i ` W {·‘ J "
_. . Yv nne Takvorian Saville, Esquire (Qu gg) Jo ua Van Naardcn. Esquire 2
il 7_ cal Counsel for Defendant unsel for Defen.'·-mt
: IZ
R ‘’t‘ 75E}, i' »
Q - *.4.. ~’ Dr a L.-—·——~—·—··—- _ l
I _ Robert Miller, Esquire _Q,¢/Warren Siege , Esquire
* j Counsel for Uchalee Vong , Counsel for Kusizi Lernan , Asan 311*
’ V Lawrence Vong} and D/o_nl5e0 Phravichit Tjajah Chandra and Lani Chandr _
l ¤ / .-di? / , · ; , r l
E E / I ‘ x·' q L U}. /]] , { 1/{M 7,/
l - Richard Cost:ig£ x' Esquire Steven Dranoff, Esqui
I i Counsel for Za?} Shah, Khan Gul , Counsel for Soly Chan and Thorn
l Salim Khan, Mo ammad Khan and Azim Bun Khem ‘
r Mohammad i
l 7 . vi / J3?
. S0 O DER D this day . A Agia, 4 ’ .
l ly of » , 2005. Th Honorab e Ke 1: ·. Jordan
1 .
l X
l i t
. QQ -
F
ai * *4
. l.
i I DEASE\2 MAHGNEY 8: BENDER, LTD.
., SUITE 1300 • 1800 JOHN F. KENNEDY BOULEVARD ¤ PHILADELPHIA. PA 19103-2978 _
l in R

Case 1:05-cv-00513-MPT Document 30 Filed O9/08/2005 Page 3 of 3 g
K I I d Case 2:05-cv-OO832—JG Document 14 Filed 05/10!2005 Page 1 of 1
E
i IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
i FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
YAN THOU, et al., 2
E Plaintiffs CIVIL ACTION
I PACK 8.; PROCESS, INC., etal.
Defendants.
. ORDFR
l AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of defendauts’ Motion to
i Dismiss, or in the Altemative, to Transfer this Action to the United States District Court for the
_ District of Delaware. the responses thereto, and oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion
to dismiss is DENIED. and the motion to transfer is GRANTED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l404(a).
i The insurance policy in question was issued in Delaware, t.hc accident occurred in
i Delaware, and the employer insured is situated in Delaware. All pertinent factual issues regarding
coverage will have to be determined in accordance with Delaware law. All of the plaintiffs in the
above matter have a common interest in participating in the Delaware federal action to make claims,
I even if competing claims, against the insured’s insurance policy. The Pennsylvania judgment against
the driver of the accident vehicle may not be issue preclusive against the employer, either in this action
i or in the Delaware action. `
i The Clerk is directed to TRANSFER the file in the above-captioned matter to the
Clerk ofthe United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
BY THE COURT:
Y e.J.
copies by FAX on
to