Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

‘ Case 1:05-cv-00473-JJF Document 4 Filed 07/14/2005 Paget of 3
THE FURTH FIRM LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
225 BUSI-I STREET, ISH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94lO4-4249
TELEPHONE ""E’ "”‘EE"° assess couwcr strict
FACSIMILE I4I'5l 982-2076 IOBOO CHALK HILL ROAD
WWW.I-UI'tI'I.COFT'\ I-tttntoanuno, <:A 95446:
TELEPHONE ITO?) 835-4379
1 1 ’ FACSIMILE I707I B35·9GB5
vm EXPRESS MAIL l @ E1] ll W
,- Q ?
Clerk of Court _ _
U.S. District Court, District of Delaware I 4
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building ` ··E· i ·
Wilmington, DE 19801 · V I _ H
Telephone; (302) 573-6170 shi;
Re: Brauch, etal. v. Intel Corp., Northern District of California
Case No. C:05-2743, (filed July 5, 2005) (assigned to the
Hon. Bernard Zimmerman).
Dear Clerk:
Please be advised that plaintiffs Michael Brauch and Andrew Meimes, plaintiffs
in the above—referenced action pending in the Northern District of California, have applied to
the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “Judicial Panel") requesting that the Judicial
Panel transfer four nearly-identical actions currently pending in U.S. District Court for the
District of Delaware to the Northern District of California and consolidate them with the ten
nearly-identical actions already pending there. These actions are captioned as follows:
District of Delaware Actions
l. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and AMD International
Sales & Service, Ltd., a Delaware corporation, v. Intel Corp., a Delaware
corporation, and Intel Kabushiki Kaisha, a Japanese corporation, No. 1:05-cv—
00441, filed in the United States District Court for t.he District of Delaware on
June 27, 2005 and assigned to Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
2. Jim Kidwell, Mary Reeder, John Malta, J IlWi'E, Inc., Chrystal Moeller, and
Caresse Harms, on their own behalves and on all others similarly situated, v.
Intel Corp., No. 1:05-cv—00470, filed in the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware on July 6, 2005. This action is not assigned to a judge as
ofthe date of this filing.
3. Robert J. Rainwater, Kathy Ann Chapman, and Sonia Yaco, on their own
behalves and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Intel Corp., No. 1:05-
cv-00473, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
on July 7, 2005. This action is not assigned to a judge as of the date of this
filing.
saint

- Case 1:05-cv-00473-JJF Document 4 Filed 07/14/2005 Page 2 of 3
July ll, 2005
Page 2
4. Matthew Kravitz and Raphael Allison, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. Intel Corp., No. 1:05-cv-00476, filed in the United States
District Court for the District of Delaware on July 8, 2005. This action has not
been assigned to a judge as of the date of this filing.
Northern District of California Actions
l. David E. Lipton and Dana F. Thibedeau, individually and on behah‘ of all
others similarly situated, v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2669, filed in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California and assigned to
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel, June 29, 2005.
2. Ronald Konieczka, individually and on behah of all others similarly situated, v.
Intel Corp., No. C:05—2700, filed in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Marilyn Hall Patel, June
30, 2005.
3. Maria I. Prohias, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
Intel Corp., No. C:05-2699, filed in the United States District Coun for the
Northern District of California and assigned to Judge James Larson, June 30,
2005.
4. Steven J. Hamilton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
Intel Corp., No. C:05-2721, filed in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Joseph C. Spero, July 1,
2005.
5. Patricia M. Niehaus, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
v. Intel Corp., No. C:05—2720, filed in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Joseph C. Spero, July 1,
2005.
6. Michael Branch, a resident of San Francisco, and Andrew Meimes, a resident of
New York, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Intel
Corp., No. C:05—2‘743, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California and assigned to Judge Bernard Zimmerman, July 5, 2005.
7. Susan Baxley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Intel
Corp., No. C-05-2758, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California and assigned to Judge Edward M. Chen, July 6, 2005.
8. Huston Frazier, Jeanne Cook Frazier and Brian Weiner, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2813, tiled in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and
assigned to Judge James Larson, July ll, 2005.
9. Dwight E. Dickerson, a resident of Oakland, California, individually and on
behah of all others similarly situated, v. Intel Corp., No. C:05—28l8, filed in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and
assigned to Judge James Larson, July ll, 2005.
saaai

- Case 1:05-cv-00473-JJF Document 4 Filed 07/14/2005 Page 3 of 3
July ll. 2005
Page 3
10. The Harman Press, an behalf af iiself and all athers similarly situated v. Intel
Corp., Case number to be assigned, filed in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California on July ll, 2005. This action has not been
assigned to a judge as of the date of this filing.
I enclose a copy of the materials filed with the Judicial Panel. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Sincerely
Alex C. Tu P 2
Enclosures.
cc: All Counsel on attached Service List
56649.1