Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

. Case 1 :05-cv-00473-JJF Document 3 Filed 07/18/2005 Page 1 of 2
” I? wr iw will an J I-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGA IIO __ .. . _
CHAIRMAN: MEMBERS: . R b Fil .A·C¤h
triage wm. rayenn Hodges nuqganarm r. Keenan Misc R¤l>¢¤ L-.M¤.¤¤¤%J¤ Egcc · · » ··
Unnned States Dnstr1ctC0urt Unnted States District Court Umlcd Su“‘?$ Dlsmcl 9***1
Middle District of Florida Southcm District of New York Nunhcm District Omndlana DIRECT REPLY TO:
Judge D. Lowell Jensen ‘g“ls§§dKSE:$g“D?éiX§%l0un gichaeixlh Bleek I
l€t3lit‘l.?"3t§r}?éi%l°é§?t£n D*S=*i=·¤tK¤¤Se §5c%n·gr.E$»r?'§m¤,peI
_ - I _ @IS_ C CIE!
G‘;lt.§r’e‘E;t‘l“3tginlf?2?0u¤ l“3$3l“5f£‘§',"iii§?tre0tty
DistricnofMaryia11d Washington, D.C. 20002
Telephone: `ZOZI 502-2800
Fm: 202 $02-2888
http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov
July I4, 2005
TO INVOLVED JUDGES
Re: MDL-1717 -- In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation
(See Attached Schedule of Actions)
Dear Judges:
Presently before the Panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is a motion to transfer which includes at
least one action before you in the above-described docket. The parties will have an opportunity to fully
V brief the question of transfer and the matter will be considered at a bimonthly Panel hearing session. In
j the meantime, yourjurisdiction continues until any transfer ruling by the Panel becomes effective.
lf you have a motion pending ~ such as a motion to remand to state court (if the action was
removed to your court) — you are free to rule on the motion, of course, or wait until the Panel has
Q decided the transfer issue. The latter course may be especially appropriate if the motion raises
y questions likely to arise in other actions in the transferee court and, in the interest of uniformity, might
A best be decided there if the Panel orders centralization.
' Please feel free to contact our staff in Washington with any questions.
Kindest regards,
in
.; Wm. Terrell Hodges
Chairman
Q
ll
C
'

Case 1:05-cv-00473-JJF Document 3 Filed 07/18/2005 Page 2 of 2
SCHEDULE OF ACTIONS
DOCKET NO. 1717
IN RE INTEL CORP. MICROPROCESSOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Northern District of Califomia
David E. Lipion, er al. v. Irue! Corp., C.A. N0. 3:05-2669 (Judge Marilyn Hall Patel)
Maria L Prohias v. Iniel Corp., C.A. N0. 3:05-2699 (Judge James L. Larson)
Ronald Konieczka v. [nie! Corp., C.A. N0. 3:05-2700 (Judge Marilyn Hall Patel)
Patricia M Niehaas v. [nie! Corp., C.A. No. 3:05-2720 (Judge Joseph C. Spero)
Sievei Hamiiion v. Iniei Corp., C.A. No. 3:05-2721 (Judge Joseph C. Spero)
Michael Branch v. Intel Corp., C.A. No. 3:05-2743 (Judge Bernard Zimmerman)
Susan Baxley v. [nie! Corp., C.A. No. 3:05-2758 (Judge Edward M. Chen)
Huston Frazier, ei al. v. [nie! Corp., C.A. N0. 3:05-2813 (Judge James L. Larson)
Dwighi E. Dickerson v. Iniei Corp., C.A. No. 3:05·28l8 (Judge James L. Larson)
The Harman Press v. Imc! Corp., C.A. No. 3:05-2823 (Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte)
District of Delaware
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., er ai. v. Intel Corp., ci al., C.A. No. 1:05-441 (Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.)
Jim Kidwel/, ei al. v. Inte! Corp., C.A. No. 1:05-470 (Judge UNASSIGNED)
Roberrl Rainwaier, er af. v. Inrei Corp., C.A. No. l;05-473 (Judge UNASSIGNED)
ilr/all/mtv /{ravi/z, er al. v. [nie! Corp., C.A. N0. l:05-476 (Judge UNASSIGNED)