Free Motion for Disclosure - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 36.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 297 Words, 1,823 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/34820/274-3.pdf

Download Motion for Disclosure - District Court of Delaware ( 36.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Disclosure - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :05-cv—00292-JJF Document 274-3 Filed 06/30/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

LG.PI-IILIPS LCD CO., LTD., i
1
l
Plaintit`t7Counterctai1n Defendant, Q
V. :
i Civil Action No. 05~292 (JJP)
TATUNG COMPANY; l
TATUNG COMPANY OP AMERICA, INC.; {
CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD.; E
AND VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, i
1
Defendants/Counterctaiin Plaintiffs. :


ORDER
WHEREAS, Plaintiff LG.Phiiips LCD Co. Ltd. having moved this Court for an order
barring further disclosure of Plaintiff s CONFIDENTIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS ONLY infomation to Dr. Nisha Mody and The CapAnalysis Group, LLP; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has further requested that Defendants be ordered to comply with
its obligations under Paragraph l(d) of Confidentiality Stipuiation and Protective Order, which
r requires that Defendants, inter alia, promptly retrieve LPL’s discovery from Dr. Mody and
CapAnalysis, bind Dr. Mody and CapAnalysis to the terms of this Order, and identify to Plaintiff
what of its CONFIDENTIAL or CONPIDENTLAL ATTORNEYS ONLY was disclosed to Dr.
Mody or Cap/analysis;

Case 1:05-cv—00292-JJF Document 274-3 Filed 06/30/2006 Page 2 of 2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this day of , 2006, that the Motion is
GRANTED. Dr. Nisha Mody and CapAnaiysis are denied access to all CONFIDENTIAL and
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS ONLY information produced by Plaintiffs, the Defendants are
ordered to immediately compiy with it I(d) of the Contidentiality Stipulation and Protective
Order, and Defendants are ordered not to use Dr. Nisha Mody and CapA.naiysis, or any work
product prepared by them that involves or relates to LPL’s CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFEENTIAL ATTORNEYS ONLY infomation, in any way, shape, or form, including but
not limited to the trial of this action.
United States District Judge
2