Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :05-cv—00160-KAJ—I\/IPT Document 225 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
YouNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
THE BRANDYWTNE BUILDING
1000 WEST STREET, 17TH FLooR
VVJLMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801 (302) 5716600
D1REcT DIAL: 302-571-6743 (302) 571-1253 FAX
DIRECT EAR; 302-576-3517 p_O_ BOX 39; (800) 253-2234 (DE ONLY)
¤l¤¤dSF€¤@>’°$¥·¤9m W1LM1NoToN, DELAWARE 19899-0391 nwvwyoungccnaway.c0m
January 29, 2007
BY HAND DELIVERY AND E-FILING
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
844 North King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Re: Novozymes A/S v. Genencor [nr ’/ Inc., C.A. No. 05-160-KAJ
Dear Judge Jordan:
1 write on behalf of Plaintiff Novozymes A/S in brief response to Defendant Genencor’s
January 29, 2007, letter to the Court (D1. 224). That letter called attention to the District of New
Hampshire’s recent decision in Travel Sentry Inc. v. T ropp, 2006 WL 3478997 (D.N.H. Dec. 1,
2006), which, unlike the licensor-licensee relationship here, involved no license at all. ln the
interests of minimizing post-trial letter briefing, Novozymes stands ready to address the merits of
this non-binding and distinguishable decision at oral argument tomorrow morning.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew A. Lundgren (N
AAL:mm
cc: Dr. Peter T. Dalleo, Clerk, U.S. District Court
Donald E. Reid, Esquire
DB0l:2277490.l 06A0a0.1001