Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 45.4 kB
Pages: 1
Date: January 2, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 592 Words, 3,438 Characters
Page Size: 609.882 x 790.531 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/34498/219.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 45.4 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00160-KAJ-l\/IPT Document 219 Filed O1/O2/2007 Page 1 of 1
Youuo CoNAwAv STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
§1t:£§11&¢tTti11,t11 itttL1%·;?ttit.it“ lG¤£EV\§M~S¤rW1~Hi§]¤¤Lgm¤ t%i$.tt1’§€1t’:1‘*°
RICHARD A.LE\"l1*€E JOEL :\..W1’U1“‘£ SANl.·\.`1' HATNAGAE 3 AT’l7·K£\‘JM UNN l
¥“1§’1§?EE§Z’t$T`f§§$T E’.’;`Z?ItCsi*é'1?;Y§iZ1 Wxmmoron, DELAWARE 19801 $§1"¤’%li1J1l3E°i`€’1{?3`€’]“‘ 1§’§1$§'.i‘§t1$Eii·;`£`t‘?
` Rtcman 1-I. Mouse CRAEG D. GREAR JEFFREY T. CASTELLANO !»£1c1—1AEL W.MCDER1·uo1‘1‘
DAVID C.MCBR1DE TlMDT`H‘:gJ1;.‘Y HOUSEAL Box 391
1.1 .‘ Il . 1 , 1 .a 1. S 1 .‘ .. .‘
IJC§§1I3H£1K)jxE~iI;;O\ P1AAtIl.1l;§eK.¥EIIZ¤51;§§N Wu“MH\GTO§'*DELA\VARE 1939943391 M!·tRYF.D1Jl3AN D Fox Mu‘mc~.:AR1x~\VAL1 ` BARRY M. Wu.t.ou¤1tav C. BARR FLINN (302} 5·H_66OO E11.tNED\\';LRIDS 1E:»::·:traR R. NOEL
EGSYW. INGERSOLL NATALIE WOLF A I<£N'1*~`E!'H J. Enos ADAM W POF?
Arrt1·iom*G.FL·no: LISA B. Goovrtow (800) 25:1-2234 (DE ONLY) 110: s. FREDERICKS sent J. REIDENBERG
IERGMEK GROSSMAN JOHN W. SHAW FAX. (302) 5·]]_l253 IANIZES J, GE~.t.t.AG1—1E1=. SAR-·1BE1‘1·1 A. R£vBuR.N
EUGENE A. D1PR1N.tto JA1w1Es P. HUGHES, JR. ' SEAN T. GRIZECHER 1· .tA.w,ts L. PAt·tox. JR. Eotvm J. 1-Lumen —-·~mr~·r STEFHANIE L. E-unset: Ssrgjzgna
. . . 1 KN 1 Dawn M.Jo:~res 1 1 .
ttttatsittsttia 1’1§£f1i‘§.§1 D. 551E* lirwetteesteet K11.1N1.K11.a1 i1.11.1111.1T111¤1111
· tmom~1· 1. swoen Rotm P. azssats. P10. BGA 394 1E2~rs1mRM.1<:r¤xus Guan $.12. STOVER
BRUCE L, SIL.\:'ER5TE.lN SCGTTA. HDLT GEDRGETOWN DELAWARE 19947 ED\\1’.-LRD 5. KOSMGWSKI IGRN E, TRACE?
WtLt.1A.·»1 W. Botvsm 101-1NT, Donsev .}' - .,-7 Jox-t:~1C.; LARRv.t.TARAs¤cos M.B1ARet;LEARv (30—·lg¤6‘—" I KARENLANT2 SnARo2~:M.zuzc
gcnaao 2. ?1L:eEa‘ro, Jn. gHRliELii»§Hé2;1;JSI]LAS wanna? (300) 355.3334 (DE Og4;_~,·) _
. N . . Nl E ,, · ·1
¤§taJ§111T‘t;·; 1111 1.;:111.111am FAA- <3¤2>S=¤—9a¤ I 11§1;_taU15tt J C 1111.a€a11111t .
. N .'?~. , Gl-[N . C ALFGHLIN, Pc URTIS . ROW‘I‘E·€ER
E‘1?i??.€&`11E§1E"“ EE’£??Z1"E. 1éO§1‘ii“ w~r-·-r¤¤~¤¤¤AA~r-Ar-COM M11 L1»1a111
NEILL: MULLEN WIALSH 1=A‘rR1c1A A. witmoss QF COUNSEL
DIRECT DIAL: 302-571-6743 §i},'jf,$T“,l,§,Ig“§§§°T Y
DIRECT FAX; 302-576-35 I 7 Eo1vARoB Maxweu, my ,
- [email protected]
January 2, 2007
BY E—FILE AND HAND DELIVERY · r
R
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States Court of Appeals
844 North King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Re: Novozymes A/S v. Genencor International, Inc. et oi.
CA. No. G5—160gKA.l'g
Dear Judge Jordan:
We write in response to Defendants Genencor International Inc. and Enzyme l
Development Corporations request for oral argument in the captioned matter (D.I. 218). Given
that the Court has already presided over a bench trial and has received the parties’ written
submissions, Plaintiff Novozymes A/S ("Novozy1nes") believes that oral argument is
unnecessary and would only delay a finai decision in this case. if the Court, however, finds that
oral argument would be helpf`ul,Novozy1nes would be available at the Courts convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
AWI1,1. Q ’ t
· _A" 7.:
Andrew A. Lundgren ‘ 4429)
AAL:mm
cc: Donald E. Reid, Esquire
DB02:2261245.1 O640S0.§t]0l