Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

| iT— -——-————-——
i , , I 0 _ Case 3:00-cv-00973-AHN Document 52 Filed 12/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
l I · I
i 00% 0/Q75/1/é5<7D»¢/5
i 5 li-i` li?
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
l EBU} lll!] iQ A li¤ 03
i DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
i iii? r
i TIMOTHY HAYES : CIVIL ACTION NO: 3
Plaintiff : 3:00CV0973(AHN)(HBF)
V. I
COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.,
d/b/a EUREST DINING SERVICES :
and CARY ORLANDI : December 19, 2003 `
g` I Defendants :
E _ PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME IN WHICH ,
J g RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMEN T I
.·i;i;Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Procedure and Local Rule 9(b) the plaintiif in
the above-captioned matter respectfully moves for the second extension of time of I4 days within J
which to respond to the defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, representing as follows: I
I I _ l
Q
E 1) The plaintiff received a 220 page Motion for Summary Judgment from the R
*6
Q Cdefendant on October 31, 2003. _ I
O I aq _
0 D
(,-7 [jj"
Q § 2) On November I4, 2003 the plaintiff tiled his initial Motion for Extension of
I-(
E 5`ime, for 30 days, which the clerk is empowered to grant, and did grant pursuant to Rule 9(b)( 1) `
ci ( gf the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, this is the second request for extention.
5 ( y Q
or I
Q §
S l
l
p E