Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv—O0812—RNC Document 87 Filed 08/12/2004 Pagqjmofzg W A lr
(A Us `e/e/ A /e e {
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT CORUT
. DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT .
JANCIS FULLER CIVIL ACTION NUM RE“3.’ cva12(RNc)(DFm)

PLAINTIFF
._,S_ ZUGM AUG I2 F9 2: 05
JOHN ARMSTRONG, ET AL. ;,p ,wCl,w_m A___ H _''_
DEFUNUANTS AUGUST 9 ,l ·* ij if s
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME h
The plaintiff in the above-entitled matter hereby requests a 30-day extension
of time in which to file her object and brief in support of objection to the
defendants' second motion for sum ary judgment, filed on 8-2-04, in the above-
captioned matter.
In support thereof, the plaintiff submits:
8 The plaintiff is has habeas corpus cases, seeking relief from illegal confinement
under docket number CRl0-226195, which was prosecuted in New London Superior Court
from 6-30-95 to 6-4-97, pending in Rockville Superior Court, under docket number
CV04-0004564, and in the U.S; District Court in Bridgeport, Connecticut, which
require extensive research and preparation of work product for the courts to review
in the near future. The limited hours of access to the prison library/library that
the plaintiff receives each week must not be squandered on this case at the expense
of those habeas corpus cases this month for the preparation of 3 brief for a case
which does not involve the possibility of an order from the Court for release from
the illegal 30-year prison sentence the plaintiff is serving under docket number
CR10—226195.
The deadline for the filing of the plaintiff's opposition brief and exhibits
is now 8-22-04 (within 20 days of the filing date of the defendants' motion for
summary judgment). A 30-day extension of the brief-filing deadline, to 9-21-04, will
permit the plaintiff to complete the opposition brief this case without causing the
plaintiff to ineffectively prosecute said habeas corpus cases.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiff respectfully requests that this motion be granted
by the Court.
THE PLAINTIFF
I ¤Q;ZlLJ[£Q;4t,
?CL¢»C»LAL» gpg.
ncis L. Fuller, pro se
20l West Main Street
0—North, F—8
Niantic, CT 06357
n_P l if l ig n_P I-- l ik I """"··*‘*-*=r< s-= Pre'?.G-;e?;-;=5:?;i;!{;E-;j,?;t_f.__{,;z,.j-,%:_,;;:;;;.i_;€

Case 3:00-cv-00812-RNC Document 87 Filed 08/12/2004 Page 2 of 2
onus]:.
The foregoing motion, having been heard, it is hereby ordered: GRANTED/DENIED.
BY THE cousin l
Judge/Magistrate }
CERTIFICATION 5
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing motion and order were mailed]
delivered, this [Elia day of August, 2004, to opposing counsel, as follows: _
Madeline Melchionne `
Assistant Attorney General l
110 Sherman Street )
Hartford, CT 06105 '
tum: PLAINTIFF (
>CLJx£5L4J czi \é2$LL#€»QQ»¤¤ .
ancis L. Fuller, pro se
201 West Main Street
O-North, F-8
Niantic, CT 06357 I