Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv-00720-JCH

Document 125

Filed 06/26/2007

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT WILLIAM CONNELLY V. THERESA LANTZ : : : JUNE 25, 2007 CIVIL NO. 3:00CV-720(JCH)

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 56, the defendant, Theresa C. Lantz, Commissioner of Correction, respectfully moves for summary judgment on all of the plaintiff's claims. Specifically, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment because the plaintiff is not in any way subjected to "increased punishment" or is subjected to any ex post facto violation. The legal grounds for summary judgment in favor of the defendant are detailed in the accompanying Memorandum of Law. In support of this Motion, the defendants submit the affidavits of Mary Jane Steele, and Frederick Levesque together with relevant moving papers. A local Rule 56 statement also accompanies this motion. DEFENDANT Theresa C. Lantz RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: __/s/____________________________ Steven R. Strom Assistant Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 Federal Bar #ct 01211 E-Mail: [email protected] Tel: (860) 808-5450 Fax: (860) 808-5591

Case 3:00-cv-00720-JCH

Document 125

Filed 06/26/2007

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following on this 25th day of June, 2007: Jonathan B. Tropp William C. Mercer Day, Berry & Howard LLP One Canterbury Green Stamford, CT 06901-2047

__/s/_________________________________ Steven R. Strom Assistant Attorney General

2