Free Order on Motion for Contempt - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I - . Case 3:00-cv-00706-SRU Document 107 Filed O4/30/2004 Pagé7$B°l‘Ii10I-” CSW:
l00
I F I I..L&”I*ED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
2000 APH I Q F3 lI= Sb
BROADWAY T .
I A 3
I BIIIUKAI-#LI.·I, I.; ) I
“ )
I V. ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 300—CV00706 (SRU)
I
)
. ) .
I BUENA VISTA PICTURES )
DISTRIBUTION, ET AL. ) APRIL 19, 2004
I §LAIggIj.IFF’S MOTION FOR THIS COURT TO FIND THE DEFENDANTS*
I és IQQIQENDED WITNESS, GEORGE L. PRIEST, AND DEFENDANTS* I
I 3 <[AT'[Q_‘__RNEYS ROSEN, BOWERMAN, AND ANDREWS IN CONTEMPT
(..3 gg I
C3 EEC:
··.:.J.L 2 EE I
\ u. BE Q?
.•=r V-VE “ I
§i En Pf`rt:(§ is presented to this Court in the document, "Defendants’ Disclosure of I
ru Q
x Expert Witnesses," as "George_ L. Priest, Esquire. " This presentation ofthe expert I
witness is followed by Mr. Priest’s report, which was admitted into evidence at I
( I
deposition of Mr. Priest by Plaintiffs counsel. Present for the Defendants at this I
» deposition were Attorneys J efirey Rosen, Richard Bowerman and Elizabeth Andrews.
Q Under oath, Mr. Priest identified and acknowledged the “George L. Priest, Esguire” I
5 report:
“ I
E E Mr. Priest: Yes, that is my report. (Priest deposition, p.l6.) I
Q
z ¤¤ I
c> ¤ '
s E I
2 ¥ I
A .--. .--. A A ____ _ _