Free Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

.., Case 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 130 Filed 07/16/2004 p6I]gg§‘t2$’Q’Z,/§m·I“·
I i UNITED STATES DISTRICT I
I FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
. ZIIIIII JUL Ib P 2=lI`I I
I KORSZUN; WOJ TEK W. Civil Actjogi blggymjgr CGIMIIQT I
BOROWSKI and COMPUCLOZ ; 3;00Cv32m[IIOIPEOI2‘I‘. cssr: I
CORPORATION I
3 I
Plaintiffs, I
I- VS. I
: I
PUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES FINAL JUDGMENT I
MULTIMEDIA, INC.; IC. PENNEY ;
·COMPANr, INC.; MATTEL, INC.
Ieand/or BRODERBUND SOFTWARE, :
INC.; and LANDS’ END, INC. I
I Defendants. i I
This matter came on before the Honorable Janet C. Hall, United States District Judge, as
Ia result of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
I The Court has reviewed all of the papers filed in conjunction with the motion and on June
12, 2003, entered a Ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment ofNon—Inii·ingement, granting I
I
Ithe defendants’ motion. .
I Thereafter, the parties, by stipulation and order entered on -· si': IO , I
agreed to resolve the Defendants’ remaining counterclaims in order to permit entry of a Final I
Judgment and an appeal therefrom. I
I Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered:
I I
(a) with prejudice, against Plaintiffs, on the claims ofthe Complaint and in favor I
of Defendants on Count I of Defendants’ First Amended Counterclaim for non- I
infringement.
I
I (b) dismissing PIaintiffs’ Complaint with prejudice; I
I
I
I I
my-568097
l l l l l l l l l l l W-- *7 (ri F 4** l
nnnlnnnn U U FXR F" "" rr- —'~-` -

{ iv Case 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 130 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 2 of 2 I
I I
` if (c) with prejudice, in favor of Plaintiffs, by consent ofthe parties, on Count III of
I Defendants’ First Amended Counterclaims for invalidity due to indefiniteness;
I = and
H E (d) dismissing all remaining counterclaims without prejudice.
I Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this day of July, 2004.
cm F comm
U BY I
I Entered on Docket
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I N
I I
I
I
2
!ny—56809`7
,..--....;L.L. -Y -···*·· J