Case 3:00-cr-00227-SRU
Document 1383
Filed 05/09/2005
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL HILLIARD SCHEDULING ORDER As a result of the remand from the Court of Appeals, I intend to consider whether I would have imposed a non-trivially different sentence in this case if the Sentencing Guidelines had been advisory. That consideration will include a review of the pre-sentence report and the transcript of the sentencing hearing conducted on December 15, 2003. If counsel wish to file written submissions concerning whether I should have imposed a non-trivially different sentence, they should file simultaneous submissions on or before June 3, 2005. If the defendant wishes to avoid resentencing, he should promptly notify the court that resentencing will not be sought. CRIMINAL NO. 3:00cr227 (SRU)
It is so ordered. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 6th day of May 2005.
/s/ Stefan R. Underhill Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge