Free Motion to Preclude - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 58.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 18, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 572 Words, 4,338 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 791.64 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9044/1416-3.pdf

Download Motion to Preclude - District Court of Connecticut ( 58.3 kB)


Preview Motion to Preclude - District Court of Connecticut
_W - ` . Case 3:00-ct-00227-Sl:lU Document 1416-3 Filed 10/14/2005 Page 1 of 2

ment 1396 Filed 08/0_3/2005 Page 1 er 1 -
`“` ` ` O D. Conn. ld
7 00-cr-227
`_ _ _ Underhill, J. -
i s A . 1 United States Court of Appeals
- ronmz
,,,. ._, _ SECOND CIRCUIT ‘ ·
[liu.! , ...1; iii -¤. ,
, - .;. [J U .
lAt'·a stated Term ofthe United States Court of Appeals for the Second _ l
Circuit, held at- the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in .
’ the City of New York, on the se day of July, two thousand and five, ` l
l
Present: ; I
Hon. John M. Walker, Jr., ; ··
_ Chief Judge, ‘,1£| l
Hon. Dennis Jacobs, QQ ¤ *4%
Hon. Pierre N. Level, L
· Circuit Judges. mt 1 A
United States of America, E C
1
Appellee,
I
v. Nos. 02—1-546-cr (L) l
02-1576-cr (Gon) I
Charles DeIesus, Edward Estrada, Benito Rosario, 03··l0l5·cr {Con) - E .
Defendants·Appella11ts l
The Governmentrnoves with consent to remand the appeal of Edward Estrada to-the district
court to detemrine whether to resentence him._QBecause Estrada did not challenge the mandatory ‘
nature ofthe Sentencing Guidelines in the district court, in light of the Supreme Courfsdeeision in _
United Stores v. Booker, 543 U.S.___, i25 S. Ct. 738 (2005), and this Court"s decision in‘..Un!red {
States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005), the motion is grmited and this case is remanded to the ,
district court for further proceedings in conformity with Crosby
Amy appeal taken "iiom the district court‘s decision on remand can be initiated only by tiling it {
new notice ofappeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 3, 4 (b).
A party will not waive or forfeit any appropriate argument on remand or on any appeal post-
remand hy not tiling a peliliori for rehearing of this remand order. Q
TR t=r/ "i?6ii`i*n`€éHGtir?" ``"`" ” "fm"' `"```` ""`‘`l é ‘
gb M _ · • v LERK Roseann B. Maclieclmie, Clerk =
Rggeanh · r___. { Z _ 1
by ....»+·f"l' nl ····· ‘ 1 , BY? PT c¤CIlo’»iq_ _ o F
Y CLERK IM Richard Alcantara., Deputy Clerk _ ` _
sAu.·rt1 " / ` WCW-vul i
L I I : I
._‘" 7 " ’ _ l _ · 2 . . .;t. L;. itF;i.é.,t.*.;t;...s;§-skzivsi·*-·=.¢:=t» ·
· 1
.... -..2___ __ ______p_ __rr __W
..... e-_...,
‘“"——~——— ;»—·—»—.·—§—TZL3 ZlI1ii€*Fi?fT`jT` f‘“'*"""$Tii.ZT.T.f 1 t_·__ M · · 1 l
D-—“—— """“`"“'*"’r···~—-·—————- l‘‘`
—¤ .. _.,.___ _ `___ _ ____ W A M U A- H ;;L;" ‘ - ";‘- ·.ee»{t—,,»i.,.»_,_..,,,,?%,,;£§,,,E, -
‘*""·¤·*·-r _,. ' " °, ·"¤"'—·".r.·—·~:-·`?#_i;L¤r_-. -, - ., ..., ‘ " ¤·‘ " -· ··.’ ~ .-;-i‘?"”?:=
""‘""···*—————···-——--——-....“:.*'..‘;":;‘,;‘~v·—————--·- -... -. ,._.e___ - 1- A A--- e- 1. _ ‘ * ‘
i ,_______ —`—“°""`“*"""*·-——¤--.....j"'_"·*—-—- 4. cr] V - -

` ` Case 3:00-cr-00227-SRU Document 1416-3 Filed 10/14/2005 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:00-cr-00227-SRU Document 1398 Filed 08/23/2005 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
v. DOCKET NO.
: 00cr227 (SRU)
EDWARD ESTRADA : _
I l
r l
ORDER
I have determined that, had the Sentencing Guidelines been advisory, I would have
imposed a non-trivially different sentence on Edward Estrada. Accordingly, re—sentencing is
scheduled for October 14, 2005 at 2:00 p.m.. The parties shall submit any briefs in aid of re-
sentencing on or before September 19, 2005. i
Entered at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 22"" day of August, 2005. i
` /s/ Stefan R. Underhill
Stefan R. Underhill
United States District Judge
i
I
A ll HCHMENT #2