Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 78.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: May 25, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 404 Words, 2,720 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9041/77.pdf

Download USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut ( 78.2 kB)


Preview USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut
14., --—»-—»»—...(.1¤l _
Case 3:00-cr-00226-SRU Document 77 Filed 05/24/2005 Page 1 of 1
“ · nears 1
mso 1
1 i D. com ··- j
l 0W%52M¢iY 2*4 ID 2= 38
1 Unaeihiii, J. 1
1 United States Court of Appeals iis;. snstmcit const
I . reruns ·",;§i3Gt;.PORi, C0a*rs¤1
SECOND CIRCUIT
1 At ai stated Term ofthe United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,
= held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, inthe City of New York, on the
1 I go*"‘ day of RP NFL two thousand and five,
‘ · Present: 1 _ _
1 Hon. James L. Oakes, . A 1
Hon. Chester J. Straub, . gu1E$ CUURT o;4
1 Circuit Judges, $(3 F WE D @9
Hon. Richard J . Holwell, * -·¤ APR zo .m5 gl U
A District Judge. 45,* . ¢.
`•;·g°“' · urlnnli l? L1 J
. 0ND·CIRC“\1 1
United States of America, 1
p Appellee, 1
‘ -- v. 03~l712-cr 1
. Marvin Span, p 1
Defendant-Appellant. ‘
The Government moves, with the consent of Defendant-Appellant Marvin Span, to remand the case n
‘ to the district court to determine whether to resentence Appellant. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision ` 1
in United States v. Booker, ____U.S.__, 125 S-. Ct. 738, 764 (2005), and this Court’s decision in United States 1
_ v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, 1 18-20 (2d Cir. 2005), the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the district A
_ court for further proceedings in conformity with Crosby.
it Any appeal taken- irom the districtcourt following this remand and re-sentencing, if it occurs, can be 1
· . initiated only by tiling a new notice of appeal, See Fed. R. App,. P. 3,4(b). A
in I A ])8`I`lZ_Y II0lZ waive 0I' f0`i'fGlt*3.l'ly 3]JpI'Op1'l3t€ 3IgUJ`I1<3I'lTZ Of! I'€H'1&1’1d Of OH {lily Etppéi-1.i POSI-Télhdhd
1 by not tiling a petition for rehearing of this remand order.
. I
Fon THE COURT:
- Ro.- 1 nB acKechnie,C . 1 1
1 $ 1. . . . radar - 1
I g The Honorable Richard J. Holwell, of the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of I
1 _A New York, sitting by designation. ·· - 1 / p 1
sac-Lan _ . . ,. { · `i" " 1 .
. ’ .. te·NZ>’l—··Emi" -
R°S°a”’n ” /1 to 1
”‘“ I $6 E D N A MUST]? `- S2 mi O -· b ,,m...,.......M~»~»~»·-~··--~#·-~· . · 1
kx V EYE"`? TTZTJERK - ` I 1
. .. . .. .. .. . . .. 1 " A ` l . I ..‘. i -i.-. .=.Q¤;;-1~;.i=
_ _ _ ‘·r¢·‘ e ·eee·
?,_,!_r,§_ 5 F ? ?
H i H V _ me H---J`- 7 7- L-
»¢·—:»-5 F F r r