Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 75.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: January 26, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 688 Words, 4,379 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/8565/55.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 75.6 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Connecticut
Twp »-- ‘. -n-_ AWT Document 55 Filed O1/25/2005 Page 1 of 3 I
!
i i
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I lillli JAN 25 P l= 39 _ l
y UNITED srArr;s or AMERICA wig ‘sII q iii
VS- DKT. 3:00CR129(AWT) i
l JAMES HUNTER
i ORDER MODIFYIN G CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE i
i On August 8, 2001, James Hunter appeared before the undersigned, having pled guilty to 1
Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. James Hunter was sentenced to a term of
imprisonment of 27 months to be followed by 5 years of supervised release. The court ordered the J
following special conditions: l) The defendant shall be required to pay restitution of $66,450 to the
victims of his offense at a rate of $400 per month on the 15'h day of each month commencing in the
second month following his release from imprisonment; 2) The defendant shall participate in a
mental health treatment program, either inpatient or outpatient, as directed by the probation office;
the defendant shall pay all or a part ofthe costs associated with such treatment, based on his ability
to pay, as determined by the probation office; 3) The defendant shall refrain from gambling, and he
shall not enter any casino or other gambling establishment, or use the internet for gambling purposes; I
4) The defendant shall participate in a compulsive gambling treatment program, as directed by the l
Probation Office; the defendant shall pay all or a part of the costs of such program, based on his I
ability to pay as determined by the Probation Office; and 5) The defendant shall make full and
complete financial disclosure to the Probation Office on a quarterly basis during the period of
supervised release. f

“_“—m——— - ——~—»—;=:;.·"·r‘"f’*""’**“i*f**’e"‘*5‘?—*?=%?e"@*;#r*r;e;i=‘·;ie"·j;_ ___ _ Y, _ V _+%_E—___V



"m—m—~—e ~ ~—»;:z;~‘“rr**Rertei*i:‘***eie**re?$‘~=*`#i*r**;r;*T*?“.Tf’1; II W -.-_ t -.- ,—%_F______


·Casé 3:00-cr-00129-AWT Document 55 Filed 01/25/2005 Page 2 of 3 I
On November 12, 2004, the court ordered the following modification to Mr. I-Itmter’s special
conditions: The defendant shall pay restitution to the victims of his offense at the rate of $245 per
{ month, except when actively enrolled in an educational/vocational program that has been approved
by the United States Probation Office; at such times he is actively enrolled in an
’ educational/vocational program, the defendant will be required to pay $100 per month towards his
i restitution. Mr. I-Iunter’s supervision is scheduled to terminate on April 1, 2008. i
On August 12, 2004, this court issued a summons and order to show cause why the
supervised release term should not be revoked based on allegations by the United States Probation i
Office that the defendant had violated the conditions of supervised release as outlined in the violation
report.
On December 15, 2004 , the defendant appeared before the court at a hearing to determine
if his supervised release should be revoked and was given the opportunity to be heard on the
allegations of the probation office. He was represented by counsel, David Moraghan. The court
found that the defendant had engaged in conduct which constitutes a violation ofthe conditions of
supervised release and ordered the following contingent modification: Should the defendant engage
further in conduct which constitutes a violation of the conditions of supervised release, and in F
response, the United States Probation Office requests a modification ofthe conditions of supervised i
release to include a halfway house placement, and the defendant voluntarily waives his statutory right
to a hearing, the court will grant this request.
In all other aspects, the Judgement and Committal Order signed August 8, 2001, and the
Restitution Order dated August 30, 2001 shall remain in full force and effect.
2

· Case 3*00-cr-00129-AWT Document 55 Filed 01/25/2005 Page 3 of 3 {
It is so ordered. . I
I .
Dated this ar °*` day of January 2005, at Hartford, Connecticut.
' Alvin W. Thompson ‘— ]
United States District Judge
J I
t
J
1
l
3 {