Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 61.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 2, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 463 Words, 2,606 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23088/22.pdf

Download Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 61.7 kB)


Preview Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-0071]-WWE Document 22 Filed O1/30/2004 Paget of 3 I
_ o © I
» Iii I
Zlilill JAN 30 ID l2= I5 l
UNITED srAfEs DISTRICT I; e ~2 _ 2_-- f-, ~ y
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
RAYMOND PASZKOWSKI, I I
Plcllhtlff Z 3ZO3CVOO7I 7(WWE) I
vs. I
PHILIP KIRPAS, ET AL., I
Defendont : JANUARY 28, 2004
PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITIONLTO MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING
mscovsmr
The Plointiff requests thclt this court deny the Jclnuory 23, 2004, motion for
order compelling discovery insofor cis the plointift hos mode Cl good-foith
ottempt to comply with discovery. in foct, discovery hos not yet evolved to the
point of the plointiff's deposition being token. Subsequent to the motion for on
order compelling discovery being filed, the clefendonts did notice the pIointiff's
deposition. This court moy wish to revisit the order compelling discovery offer the
deposition of Rdymond Poszkowski tokes ploce. As the defendonts will leorn, Mr.
Poszkowski hols on impolrecl clbility to recoil events. N
As to the suggestion thot plciintiff’s counsel hos been onything other thorn
- forthcoming in this cose, the foct of the motter is we simply do not hove in our I
possession the file from o prior lowsuit filed by Mr. Poszkowski. lvlr. Poszkowski hos
1
I
I
. I



Case 3:03-cv-OO71Z¥WWE Document 22 Filed O1/$$052004 Page 2 Of 3
i · _ J, Rn.-
l . l
lg i
l timely responded to interrogatory requests. The defendants have thus far
. l
i rejected this suggestion by plaintiff’s counsel that a deposition might be the
l s
T proper way to proceed. i
{ For all ofthe reasons stated above, the plaintiff requests that this court
/ deter moving on the motion for order compelling discovery until such time as Mr. I
I Paszl determine whether there has been any sort of willful or deliberate attempt to i
. l
frustrate the discovery. l
.THE PLAINTIFF
RAYMOND PASZKOWSKT
N RMAN A. PA IS l
5l Elm Street, Suite 409 5
New Haven, CT 065l O
Telephone: (203) 562—993l
Fed Bar No. l3l2O T
His Attorney i
l
2 l
l
._..._t-·—-··-··-;

I
l Case 3:03-cv-OO71i7¥WWE Document 22 Filed O1é3Qj2004 Page 3 of 3 ’
1 _ .. \a_ a L l
l
l l
l l
l . l
l CERTIFICATION i
This is lo cerlily lhal a copy of lhe foregoing was senl via lirsl class mail,
poslage prepaid, on , lo lhe following parlies and counsel ol record: ‘
Pally G. Swan
Gordon, Muir & Foley LLP
l—larllord Square Norlh
lO Columbus Boulevard
Harllord, CT 06l 06 N
l
r~ioRMAn A. r=· s

l
l
—...............-·-·--·»-;