Free Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 62.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 28, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 459 Words, 2,761 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23088/20.pdf

Download Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut ( 62.2 kB)


Preview Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut
..... . . . A.4`
Case 3:03-cv-00717-WWE Document 20 Filed O1/26/2004 Page 1 of 2 I
( ___, 2
le l D l
ZUUH JAN 2b ID l= 30
+|‘iSlJiE`£`1§I:§;`;$ zj..e.;£*;`;"
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR Pqqm-3,-;qq;—!q,qI·, q-, q
for the '""'` ' '
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
at HARTFORD
1
RAYMOND PASZKOWSKI : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3 03 00717 (WWE)
Plaintiff :
vs. Z
PHILIP KIRPAS, ET AL I
Defendants : JANUARY 23, 2004 ¤
AFFIDAVIT RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR
PERMISSION TO SERVE DISCOVERY
In accordance with Local Rule 9(d), the undersigned being duly sworn, hereby deposes
and says:
1. Iam over the age of 18 and believe in the obligation of an oath.
2. I am an associated attorney with Gordon, Muir & Foley, and represent the
defendants in this action.
3. On or about September 4, 2003, the defendants served on the plaintiff their first set
of discovery requests. R
4. Plaintiff requested an extension of time to respond to the discoveiy until December
3, 2003.
5. Sometime after December I2, 2003, the defendants received the plaintiffs
discovery responses.
6. By correspondence dated J anuaiy 8, 2004, counsel for the defendants wrote to
counsel for the plaintiff regarding the plaintiffs responses.
GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, AT'l`OBNEYS AT Law, HAI1·1·1#o1:u Souiuus Nox·I·11,T1sN Corluunus Boumcvaizii, Ilrmrronu, CT 06106-1976 l
'1`EL1¤:P1I0m¤: {560) 525-5361 FACSIMILE (E60) 525-464-9 Jmus No. 24-029 `
q--qq qq; ..q_q qq __ qq __ qq qq qq qq qq qq qq qq qqi - I -P-I _ Pnililini
4
_q.. pq., _q.. qq qq.. ..q___qq __ qq __ qq __ qq qq qq qq qq qq qq qq I.I'I'I'I'I`C`i`

......i.......;_....,-_..—.._
Case 3:03-cv-0071]-WWE Document 20 Filed O1/26[2004 Page 2 of 2
5. Counsel for the defendants clearly outlined what was requested to comply with the
discovery. l
6. By way of correspondence dated January 14, 2004, the plaintiff through his counsel I
I
provided amended responses. l
7. Accordingly, the parties have in good faith attempted to reach an agreement
concerning the deiendants’ discovery and plaintiffs responses thereto.
8. Counsel were unable to reach an agreement concerning 9 of the defendants’ request
without the intervention of the court.
Dated in Hartford, Connecticut, on January 23, 2004.
PATTY G. g£AN`. I
!
Personally appeared before me, PATTY G. SWAN, and made an oath to the truth ofthe matters
contained herein before me this 23rd day of January, 2004.
l
__, ·--— ·‘ ` / x. l
IM `
Commission f the Superior Court p
GORDON. MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, A·r··r·o1mrrYs A1·I.Aw, HARTFORD SQUARE Nonru, Tim Corumuus Uouuwnnn, Hsnrronn, C'l` 06106-1976 I
'l`m,1:1=1-soma (HBO) 525-5361 l·`Acs1r~r1r.1: (860) 525-484-9 Jums No. 24029