Free Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 72.8 kB
Pages: 3
Date: January 28, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 555 Words, 3,144 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23088/19.pdf

Download Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut ( 72.8 kB)


Preview Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00712-WWE Document 19 Filed O1/26/2004 Page 1 of 3 i
O O
if
I run uri 2b P " BU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT ‘ :
for the gfrlglir ¥-= - ‘e ‘~
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
at BRIDGEPORT
RAYMOND PASZKOWSKI : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3 03 00717 (WWE)
Plaintiff :
vs. A Z
PHILIP KIRPAS, ET AL E _
Defendants : JANUARY 23, 2004
MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY
In accordance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) and the local rules, the
defendants move for an order of the court compelling the plaintiff to respond fully and provide
complete documentation to 10 discovery requests contained in the defendant’s First Set of
Discovery served on him on or about September 4, 2003 and to provide the defendant with a
fully executed medical authorization and a damage analysis. A memorandum of law in support
of such motion is attached hereto an incorporated herein pursuant to Local Rule 9(a). l
The undersigned cormsel and counsel for the plaintiff conferred through correspondences
dated January 8, 2004 and January 14, 2004. There was a good faith effort on part of the I
defendants through counsel to obtain the information requested (as there was no objection posed to I
the questions asked) and a good faith effort to reach an agreement. However, the parties through
counsel were unable to reach an agreement as to sufficiency of the plaintiffs responses. Out ofthe
13 claimed deficiencies, 9 requests need the intervention of the court. The affidavit required Q
G()Rl)ON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, Arronnnvs AT Lrrw, ll.»ur·rr··on1> Sourxmt Nonru, 'l`i·:N Corurrnus Borrmvarrn, llAR'l`l·`DlH.\, C`l` OrltO($-I97·‘@ I
Tmmnromc (060) 525-5001 ItA:;smn.ra [neo) 525—¤1-aria Jums No, 24029 I
I
.sst.s i tssf
-——;;-W -NQ;-,_ T W W H W H W H H H H H N U I
»ss2 A-T scvss r..

CFI
Case 3:03-cv-OO7(17jWWE Document 19 Filed O1/,2652004 Page 2 of 3 j
\ l
`____. " l
l
pursuant to Federal Rule 37(a) and Local Rule 9(d) is filed simultaneously herewith. 5
DEFENDANTS: Z
PATTY G. WAN
Gordon, Muir and Foley, LLP ,
10 Columbus Boulevard i
Hartford, CT 06106 ‘
(860) 525-5361 ;
Federal Bar No. CTl5656
l
l
l
l
l

- l
GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, ATTOIKNEYS AT Law, Hmu‘1ro12D SQUARE NQRTH, Tmi C01.uM11us H0u1.1cv.·l1w, HARTFORD, CT 06106-1976
'l`1xLm¤11oN12 (seo] 5256861 FACSIMILE (neo) 525-4a49 Jl-WS NO- 24029
l
L _ °“‘‘ “‘__ ‘"

Case 3:03-cv-OO7€J5WWE Document 19 Filed O1/$$2004 Page 3 of 3 {
CERTIFICATION N
N
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing together with the attached memorandum of
law was mailed to the following counsel of record certified on January 23, 2004:
Norman A. Pattis, Esquire
Williams & Pattis, LLC
51 Elm Street, Suite 409
New Haven, CT 06510 N
ciak of com-t
U.S.D.C. at Bridgeport
915 Lafayette Boulevard Q
Bridgeport, CT 06604
PA TY G. WAN I
N
N
N
N
N
N
GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLI", i\1·1·oiaNiivs AT Law, llixirrroizn Souium Nouru, Tim Comnmus Nlom.1av.ann, l-Imrrivonia, (J‘l` OUIOG-1973 N
'Fmwuomt (uoci)525-5361 FAc.smn.1¢ (noo) nas-4s=ia JUMS No 2+029
N