Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Cas(<3:03-cv-00718-Ain Document 24 Filed 08/12/%*% Page1 of1 A
. , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
PATRICIA HOEY, ) j @ V éx
Plaintiff, ) CIVIL Acnowig (lg ( s @ (
vs. A T ) No. 303 713(A _// A
( ¢ ( ) Q/;`<\ *4 Q.: s'
) 0,lp /*0
IOHN E. POTTER, ‘ ) Q OOO, 7,
j POSTMASTER GENERAL ) . 4)/* ‘
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ) August 10, 2004
Defendant ) (
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
DEFENDANT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AN D/OR SUMMARY
JUDGEMENT
Pursuant to Local Rule 9(b) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6, the plaintiff, Patricia Hoey,’
respectfully request an extension of time of twenty three (23) days, up to and
including September 3, 2004 to respond to the Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss,
Or In The Alternative, For Surmnary Iudgment. In support of this motion, the
undersigned counsel for plaintiff states that the additional time is required to
( further confer with the Plaintiff and obtain a supporting affidavit. “`
( This is p1aintiff’s first motion for an extension of time to respond to defendant’s
motion for dismissal and / or summary judgment.
· g The undersigned has spoken to Attorney Anna V. Crawford, counsel for the
‘ defendant, and she has no objection to the granting of plaintiff request for an
` A extension. ‘
THE PLAINTIFF, (
, jj" j._
Q T M ;c§ .
¤ g af; By. é {
j ‘ZlélwS/ . ~ V 3,) ’9cu¤“'mu¤,Induda¤ Charles G. Parks, Ir. (CT 16784)
—-· Q is §E¤¤¢j_ |g' ‘ ._ r PARKS &ASSOCIATES
.... ,_,__ . ,__ sssourdqmq.
LL 3 gg er » 160 Forest Street ~
__ r/\.·`,o.., lf dg ~, Stamford, CT 06901-2134
l ,) · EY; my ( N (203) 359-3860
Ramon; W Og) I .,4,0]+ » (203) 323-7398 - facsimile
, V A ll
0§cu‘T\5eru>9~\ 1
.
<