Free Order on Motion for Conference - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 52.4 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 27, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 297 Words, 2,122 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23015/34.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Conference - District Court of Connecticut ( 52.4 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Conference - District Court of Connecticut
it _ Qfyase-3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 34 Filed O4/26/2004 Page 1 ofl l
KF · _ - .

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I "`°‘r"}* I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT · ‘ i 5
t · in , _ ,.7
`'“““``“``''""``""'`` C` ```""""'"'''`'`'`"`"```‘‘`‘‘‘‘‘"”" " ''''' X '``il l“]"""*i
_ BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM : yj ‘~r I M _(__.
NEWTON, ROBERT FITZPATRICK, and MERIT : CASE NUMBER; i »-II ‘T‘’ " S‘``` I
CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC., : 3:03 CV 00644 (CPD) `
Plaintiffs, ‘
vs.
i NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OFJQITTSBURGH, PA., and :
AIG TECI$\IICAgL SERVICES, INC., : March 1, 2004
Q" 4 "I?’ Tl Defendants. i
Q] ·' U. •.,..._ I- ..
{alert ............ ..................................... X
E { —>= MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE AND
`_ 3* lem i -·--`` `j·_·‘g COORDINATED SCHEDULING ORDER
E g Defendants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“‘Nationa1
Q "S Union") and AIG Technical Services, Inc. ("AIGTS”) (hereinafter referred to collectively as I
fxational Union") hereby respectfully move pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l6(a)-(b) and 42(a) and ‘
. C
T ED. Conn. L. Civ. R. 16(a)—(b) that this Court schedule a status conference for the purpose of
L
4; c I coordinating by order the schedules of the above-captioned action and Gwynn, et rn'., v. National
s .
@ Q `qnion, et al., Docket Number 3:03 CV 01154 (CFD) ("Gwynn"), transferred to this Court by
. bkder dated October 14, 2003, and now referred together with this action to Magistrate Judge
Thomas P. Smith by Order dated February 17, 2004 for the purpose of conferring on scheduling
and settlement matters.
In support of this motion, undersigned counsel states as follows:
l. Plaintiffs in the companion Gwynn action moved to consolidate that case
with this action on September 29, 2004. As the basis for their Motion, Plaintiffs indicated that
{0006l6l6; l; 0040-3} i
l
l