Free Motion for Return of Property - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 71.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: February 4, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 406 Words, 2,485 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23002/19.pdf

Download Motion for Return of Property - District Court of Connecticut ( 71.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Return of Property - District Court of Connecticut
W #)*Wiw ,L--4»—» v..-...».....;. ..- .. — l.L;...in ,....,.........._..... __'
. »» |
Case 3:03-cv-OOk63Q—SFiU Document 19 Filed O2/Q3/2005 Page 1 of 4 `
\_,_,» p
f" li,. [Q E
I ZBBSFEB —3 {D 3,uZ [
l
UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT E`
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT A ' ' `“ ` " *?
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER : CASE NO. 3:03-CV—631 (SRU)
& SMITH, INC. : I
Plaintiff :
V. :
DAVID R. CRAW -
z FEBRUARY 3, 2005 I
Defendant. : A
MOTION FOR RET!} RN OF PROPERTY
Pursuant t0 Notice received from the Court, the Plaintiff, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner l
& Smith, hereby moves for the return of property on tile with the Court in this case.
Specifically, the plaintiff requests that the bond posted by the plaintiff dated April 9, 2003,
Surety Bond # 6209067, in the amount of $25,000 from Safeco Insurance Company be
returned to the plaintiff In support of this motion, the plaintiff represents that this case settled
and, therefore, there is no reason for the Court to n1aintain the bond.
WHEREF ORE, the plaintiff respectfully requests that its motion be granted.
l
ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED i
TESTIMONY IS NOT REQUIRED N
‘i‘eee‘e·e
l·l'l`l`i`
; A .. as .. - .. I __ I __ , __ Q, pp lllllllnlnlnlnl

,, I I
II Case 3:03-cv-OOQSISRU Document 19, Filed O2/@362005 Page 2 of 4
. `=\___.
E
THE PLAINTIFF I
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH,
INC. I
I
Michael McCormack, cI 13799 I
TYLER COOPER & ALCORN, LLP I
CityPlacc — 35"‘ Floor _ I
Hartford, CT 06103-3488 I
Telcpllonc: (860) 725-6200 I
. Fax: (860) 278-3802 I
Email: gnccormack@ty1crco0pcrmm I
- Its Attorneys — I
I
I
I
I

. U 1
Case 3:03-cv-0063}-SRU Document 19h Filed O2/53362005 Page 3 of 4 `
i
Qkmx
The foregoing Motion having been presented to the Court, it is hereby ORDERED:
GRANTED/DENIED. J
By The Court,
i

Judge/Clerk
\
i
i
t
t
i

t


Case 3:03-cv-0063j —SFlU Document 19 Filed O2/P%2005 Page 4 of 4
l
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, on February
3, 2005 to:
1
Gary Klein g
Sandak Friedman Sommer & Greco, LLP i
970 Summer St.
Stamford, CT 06905-5503
Steven L. Manchel i
199 Wells Avenue i
suite 106 l
Newton, MA 02459 i
David McComb, Esq.
‘ Rubin & Associates, P.C l
10 South Leopard Road l
MCS Building 5
Paoli, PA 19301
Michael McCormack
TF"'“` i