Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

( ` · Case 3:03-cv-01048-PCD Document 134 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
CLIFTON S. FREEDMAN, )
)
Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 3:03CV0l048 (PCD)
v. )
)
Q THE TOWN OF FAIRFIELD, )
§ DETECTIVE WILLIAM YOUNG AND )
3 DETECTIVE DAVID BENSEY )
Q (Individually and in their official capacities ) OCTOBER 3, 2006
Q, as police officers for the Town of Fairfield,) )
· )
E § Defendants. )
S E
’ gg DEFENDANT’S RENEWED OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
Q ATTORNEY’S FEES
D O
o 8
§§ Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2), the Defendants, The
<( Q
U) I-
gg Town Fairfield, Detective William Young and Detective David Bensey, respectfully
E8 . . . . . . . . .
‘<’g renew their obj ection to the Pla1nt1ff"s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. The Plaintiff, in
his Renewed Motion for Attorney’s Fees, concedes that the Motion for
< LD
I
gg Reconsideration, which was denied on September 19, 2006, was in fact filed in a
¤ $2
gg timely fashion. In support of this Objection, the Defendants submit the accompanying
ft ¤;
E • memorandum of law.l
S
§ THE DEFENDANTS
6
Ig ,7/
2 { /
“° By: K
Wa ter A. Shalvoy, Jr. (ct25l32)
Maher & Murtha, LLC
528 Clinton Avenue
Bridgeport, CT 06605
(203) 367-2700
1 This Motion and Memorandum of Law is identical in all substantive respects to the Motion and
Memorandum served on the Plaintiff on December 23, 2005.

` l ~ Case 3:03-cv-01048-PCD Document 134 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been sent via first-class mail,
postage prepaid, on this 3"1 day of October 2006 to the following:
Daniel J. Klau, Esq.
Pepe & Hazard LLP
Goodwin Square
Q 225 Asylum Street
Q Hartford, CT 06103-4302
5 Fax No: 860-522-2796
if
ai /
gg Walter A. Shalvoy, r.
Lu I
gs
8 §
QE
S6
E;
O
Hg
g g
E O
§ a
%§
E 6
§ n;
E O
§
5
5
E
2