Free Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 58.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 23, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 425 Words, 2,578 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22726/39.pdf

Download Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Connecticut ( 58.0 kB)


Preview Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Connecticut

yi Case 3:03-cv-00609-55U Document 39 Filed 10/20/€;(§t3 Page 1 of 2
[ KET ii ii TY init
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT as t .D,r , lk., 1
` DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
rz ‘ ‘ " !`?> i= 0 in
ROBERT L. BROCKWAY, JR. : wa] Um A0 `
Piamarr ; ii W I I .
V.
YALE UNIVERSITY, JEROME N. FRANK : CIVIL ACTION NO. i
LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION OF 3:03cv00609(SRU) ‘
YALE LAW SCHOOL; RICHARD C. LEVIN, ;
President ofthe University, Official Capacity;
ROBERT A. SOLOMON, Director of JEROME N. : I
FRANK LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION V
OF YALE LAW SCHOOL, I/O; ANTHONY T. ; .
KRONMAN, Dean of Yale Law School, I/O,
CARROLL LEE LUCHT, Law Professor, :
and Attorney at Law, I/O; STEPHEN WIZNER, F
Law Professor, and Attorney at Law, I/O. : OCTOBER 17, 2003 K
Defendants
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR E
MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) Motion. for More Definite Statement the R
plaintiff respectfully submits this Motion.
Def`endants’ Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss dated October 10,
2003 is vague or ambiguous on page 2, lines 9 to 10 whereby the defendants state that
"The def`endant(s) is (are) not state actor(s) . . ."
The plaintiff asserts that indeed the defendants Lucht, Wizner, Solomon, and ‘ I
!
Kronman were acting under the color ofthe state. They are indeed state actors. They i
were Attorneys at Law, and were licensed to practice in Federal, and in State Courts. N
l



i Case 3:03-cv-OO609—€·RU Document 39 Filed 10/20/l2QO3 Page 2 of 2
i J Q
X They are indeed Officers ofthe Federal Courts, and ofthe State Courts, and accordingly,
j these defendants truly enjoy all the powers, and privileges therefrom.
That is the reasoning as to why these defendants were sued both in their
Individual and Official Capacities, and each properly served two summons for each _
capacity. f
In this regard the plaintiff moves for a more definite statement. The plaintiff needs .
a more definite statement, in order to formulate a complete responsive pleading.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Robert L. grocgay, Jr. é I
BROCKWAY V. YALE UNIVERSITY, ET AL N
USDC, BRIDGEPORT CIVIL ACTION NO.3:O3CV00609 (SRU)
CERTIFICATION I
This is to certify that the foregoing MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE I
STATEMENT has been served in person on October 17, 2003 to the law office of
PATRICK M. NOONAN and BROCK T. DUBIN of DELAQNEY, ZEMETIS,
DONAHUE, DURHAM & NOONAN, RC., Concept Park-Suite 306, 741 Boston Post
Road, Guilford, CT 06437.
é gz
Robert L. Broc way, Ir. ‘/ I
./
/f