Free Third Party Complaint - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BILL L. GOUVEIA AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSE GUERRA V. : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 303 CV 597 MRK

SIG SIMONAZZI NORTH AMERICA, INC. : AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY MERGER : TO SASIB NORTH AMERICA, INC., AS : SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY MERGER TO : SASIB BAKERY NORTH AMERICA, INC. : ______________________________________: SIG SIMONAZZI NORTH AMERICA, INC. V. : :

SASIB FOOD MACHINERY MV, S.P.A., SASIB BAKERY ITALIA, S.P.A., DRY PRODUCTS, S.P.A., AND COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIALI RIUNITE : ______________________________________

JANUARY 21, 2004

THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

The Third-Party Plaintiff, Sig Simonazzi North America, Inc., as and for its ThirdParty Complaint against the Third-Party Defendants, Sasib Food Machinery MV, S.p.A, Sasib Bakery Italia, S.p.A., Dry Products S.p.A., and Compagnie Industriali Riunite, S.p.A, alleges as follows:

One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

08742.0583

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 2 of 17

PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 1. The third-party plaintiff, Sig Simonazzi North America, Inc. ("SSNA"), is a

Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in the State of Texas. 2. The third-party defendant, Sasib Food Machinery MV, S.p.A ("Sasib

Food"), is an Italian corporation, with a registered office and principal place of business in Verona, Italy, engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, assembling, marketing, selling, and distributing bakery equipment, including the Bakery Line Bread and Roll Making Machine, model/order number 3444 CHA, which is claimed by the plaintiff to have caused the injuries involved in this case (the "Bakery Machine"). 3. The third-party defendant, Sasib Bakery Italia, S.p.A ("Sasib Bakery"), is

an Italian corporation with a registered office and principal place of business in Verona, Italy, engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, assembling, marketing, selling, and distributing bakery equipment, including the Bakery Machine. 4. The third-party defendant, Dry Products S.p.A. ("Dry Products"), as

successor in interest by reorganization, merger, continuation and/or continuation of product line to Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both, is an Italian corporation with a registered office and principal place of business in Italy, directly or indirectly engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, assembling, marketing, selling, and distributing bakery equipment, including the Bakery Machine. Alternatively, Dry Products, as successor in interest by reorganization, merger, continuation and/or

-2­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 3 of 17

continuation of product line to Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both, assumed the liabilities of Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both.. 5. The third-party defendant, Compagnie Industriali Riunite, S.p.A ("CIR"), is

an Italian corporation with a registered office and principal place of business in Leini (Turin) Italy, which at all times relevant hereto was the 100% owner of Sasib Food, Sasib Bakery, or Dry Products, or all three, and directly or indirectly was engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, assembling, marketing, selling, and distributing bakery equipment, including the Bakery Machine. Alternatively, CIR, as successor in interest by reorganization, merger, continuation and/or continuation of product line to Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both, assumed the liabilities of Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both. 6. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a),

as SSNA's claims against Sasib Food, Sasib Bakery, Dry Products, and CIR (collectively "Third-Party Defendants") are so related to the claims asserted by the plaintiff, Bill L. Gouveia, as Administrator of the Estate of Jose Guerra (the "Administrator") against SSNA in the Complaint, which allegations are expressly denied by SSNA, in that they form part of the same case and controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. 7. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the Third-Party Defendants

pursuant to section 33-929(f) of the Connecticut General Statutes because the ThirdParty Complaint arises out of a contract which was intended to be performed in
-3­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 4 of 17

Connecticut, because the Third-Party Defendants had a reasonable expectation that the Bakery Machine would be used in Connecticut at the time the Third-Party Defendants designed, manufactured, distributed, and assembled the Bakery Machine, and the Bakery Machine was used in Connecticut, and because the alleged tortious conduct which is the subject matter of the Third-Party Complaint occurred in Connecticut. 8. Venue is proper in the District of Connecticut pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1391 because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims which are the subject matter of the Third-Party Complaint occurred in Connecticut. BACKGROUND 9. forth herein. 10. On or about April 2, 2003, the Administrator filed this action against SSNA SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 8 as if fully set

in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. A copy of the Administrator's Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 11. On or about July 17, 2003, SSNA filed its Answer and Affirmative

Defenses. A copy of the Answer and Affirmative Defenses is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 12. In the Complaint, the Administrator claims that on or about April 27, 2001,

the decedent, Jose Guerra (the "Decedent"), was lawfully on the premises of Chaves Bakery, located in Bridgeport, Connecticut, performing his regular duties as a baker, which included working near the Bakery Machine.
-4­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 5 of 17

13.

The Administrator further alleges that on or about April 27, 2001, after the

Decedent entered an access door adjacent to the Bakery Machine, the Bakery Machine, and in particular a product transfer trolley, started and struck the Decedent's shoulder, neck, and head with great force, and caused the Decedent catastrophic and fatal injuries. 14. The Administrator further alleges, and SSNA expressly denies, that the

Bakery Machine was defective in that it failed to have any interlock, sensor, or safety switch to stop the product transfer trolley once the Decedent opened the access door and/or came into contact with the product transfer trolley, and that the Bakery Machine was defective, unsafe and unreasonably dangerous by virtue of a design and/or manufacturing defect. 15. The Administrator further alleges, and SSNA expressly denies, that SSNA

failed and/or refused to warn or advise the Decedent of the purported dangerous characteristics of the Bakery Machine; inadequately provided the Decedent with sufficient notice of the Bakery Machine's purported dangerous characteristics; misrepresented that the Bakery Machine was safe to use; negligently failed to comply with reasonable industry standards and governmental regulations; negligently failed to fully and properly test and study the Bakery Machine; negligently failed to correct the Bakery Machine's alleged defects after having learned of the hazards associated with the Bakery Machine's use; and negligently failed to recall the Bakery Machine once it had knowledge of the purported life-threatening hazards associated with its use.
-5­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 6 of 17

16.

The Administrator further alleges, and SSNA expressly denies, that SSNA

breached certain implied warranties and representations pertaining to the Bakery Machine. 17. The Administrator also claims punitive damages under C.G.S. § 52-240b,

to which SSNA denies the Plaintiff is entitled. FIRST COUNT AS TO SASIB FOOD 18. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 as if fully

set forth herein. 19. Upon information and belief, Sasib Food designed, manufactured,

assembled, marketed, distributed, and sold the Bakery Machine involved in this case. 20. Sasib Food is a designer, manufacturer, distributor or seller of the type of

bakery machine involved in this case, including the one involved in this case, and is or was engaged in the business of selling the Bakery Machine involved in this case. 21. Sasib Food designs, produces, manufactures, distributes, or sells bakery

equipment, including the Bakery Machine claimed to be involved in this case, with the reasonable expectation that such bakery equipment, and this Bakery Machine in particular, would be used in the State of Connecticut, and the Bakery Machine was so used in the State of Connecticut. 22. If the allegations in the Complaint are true, which allegations are expressly

denied as set forth more fully in the Answer filed by SSNA, then the accident, injury, and damages were due to the negligence, carelessness, wanton care, or culpable conduct
-6­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 7 of 17

of Sasib Food, its agents, servants, or employees, which negligence was active, primary and the direct and immediate cause of the alleged accident and injury, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature. 23. Sasib Food, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the

situation to the exclusion of SSNA. 24. SSNA did not know of the negligence of Sasib Food, its agents, servants,

or employees, had no reason to anticipate it, and could reasonably rely upon Sasib Food, its agents, servants, or employees, not to be negligent. 25. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator, then Sasib Food is liable to

indemnify SSNA for any judgment rendered against it along with reimbursing SSNA for all costs associated with this litigation, including attorneys' fees, expenses and other costs. SECOND COUNT AS TO SASIB FOOD 26. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 and

paragraphs 19 through 21 as if fully set forth herein. 27. If the allegations of the Complaint are true, which allegations are expressly

denied, then the accident, injury, and damages were due to the actions of Sasib Food, its agents, servants, or employees, which actions were active, primary, and the direct and immediate cause of the defective condition, the accident, injuries, and damages, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature.
-7­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 8 of 17

28.

Sasib Food, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the

situation to the exclusion of SSNA. 29. SSNA did not know of the actions of Sasib Food, its agents, servants, or

employees, had no reason to anticipate them, and could reasonably rely on Sasib Food, its agents, servants, or employees, not to act in such a manner. 30. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator for any of the Administrator's

claims, then SSNA is entitled to indemnification and contribution, including attorneys' fees, costs and expenses, from Sasib Food, pursuant to Connecticut's Product Liability Act, C.G.S. § 52-572(m), et seq. THIRD COUNT AS TO SASIB BAKERY 31. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 as if fully

set forth herein. 32. Upon information and belief, Sasib Bakery designed, manufactured,

assembled, marketed, distributed, and sold the Bakery Machine involved in this case. 33. Sasib Bakery is a designer, manufacturer, distributor or seller of the type

of bakery machine involved in this case, including the one involved in this case, and is or was engaged in the business of selling the type of bakery machine involved in this case. 34. Sasib Bakery designs, produces, manufactures, distributes, or sells

bakery machines, such as the one involved in this case, including the one involved in

-8­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 9 of 17

this case, with the reasonable expectation that the Bakery Machine would be used in the State of Connecticut and it was so used in the State of Connecticut. 35. If the allegations in the Complaint are true, which allegations are expressly

denied, then the accident, injury, and damages were due to the negligence, carelessness, wanton care, or culpable conduct of Sasib Bakery, its agents, servants, or employees, which negligence was active, primary and the direct and immediate cause of the alleged accident and injury, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature. 36. Sasib Bakery, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the

situation to the exclusion of SSNA. 37. SSNA did not know of the negligence of Sasib Bakery, its agents,

servants, or employees, had no reason to anticipate it, and could reasonably rely upon Sasib Bakery, its agents, servants, or employees, not to be negligent. 38. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator, then Sasib Bakery is liable to

indemnify SSNA for any judgment rendered against it along with reimbursing SSNA for all costs associated with this litigation, including attorneys' fees, expenses and other costs. FOURTH COUNT AS AGAINST SASIB BAKERY 39. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 and

paragraphs 32 through 34 as if fully set forth herein.

-9­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 10 of 17

40.

If the allegations in the Complaint are true, which allegations are expressly

denied, then the accident, injury, and damages were due to the actions of Sasib Bakery, its agents, servants, or employees, which actions were active, primary, and the direct and immediate cause of the defective condition, the accident, injuries, and damages, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature. 41. Sasib Bakery, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the

situation to the exclusion of SSNA. 42. SSNA did not know of the actions of Sasib Bakery, its agents, servants, or

employees, had no reason to anticipate them, and could reasonably rely on Sasib Bakery, its agents, servants, or employees, not to act in such a manner. 43. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator for any of the Administrator's

claims, then SSNA is entitled to indemnification and contribution, including attorneys' fees, costs and expenses, from Sasib Bakery, pursuant to Connecticut's Product Liability Act, C.G.S. § 52-572(m), et seq. FIFTH COUNT AS TO DRY PRODUCTS 44. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 as if fully

set forth herein. 45. Upon information and belief, Dry Products designed, manufactured,

assembled, marketed, distributed, and sold the Bakery Machine involved in this case.

- 10 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 11 of 17

46.

Dry Products is a designer, manufacturer, distributor, or seller of the type

of bakery machine involved in this case, including the one involved in this case, and is or was engaged in the business of selling the Bakery Machine involved in this case. 47. Dry Products designs, produces, manufactures, distributes, or sells

bakery machines, such as the one involved in this case, including the one involved in this case, with the reasonable expectation that the Bakery Machine would be used in the State of Connecticut and it was so used in the State of Connecticut. 48. If the allegations in the Complaint are true, which allegations are expressly

denied, then the accident, injury, and damages were due to the negligence, carelessness, wanton care, or culpable conduct of Dry Products, its agents, servants, or employees, which negligence was active, primary and the direct and immediate cause of the alleged accident and injury, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature. 49. Dry Products, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the

situation to the exclusion of SSNA. 50. SSNA did not know of the negligence of Dry Products, its agents,

servants, or employees, had no reason to anticipate it, and could reasonably rely upon Dry Products, its agents, servants, or employees, not to be negligent. 51. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator, then Dry Products is liable to

indemnify SSNA for any judgment rendered against it along with reimbursing SSNA for

- 11 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 12 of 17

all costs associated with this litigation, including attorneys' fees, expenses and other costs. SIXTH COUNT AS TO DRY PRODUCTS 52. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 and 45

through 47 as if fully set forth herein. 53. If the allegations in the Complaint are true, which allegations are expressly

denied, then the accident, injury, and damages were due to the actions of Dry Products, its agents, servants, or employees, which actions were active, primary, and the direct and immediate cause of the defective condition, the accident, injuries, and damages, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature. 54. Dry Products, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the

situation to the exclusion of SSNA. 55. SSNA did not know of the actions of Dry Products, its agents, servants, or

employees, had no reason to anticipate them, and could reasonably rely on Dry Products, its agents, servants, or employees, not to act in such a manner. 56. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator for any of the Administrator's

claims, then SSNA is entitled to indemnification and contribution, including attorneys' fees, costs and expenses, from Dry Products, pursuant to Connecticut's Product Liability Act, C.G.S. § 52-572(m), et seq.

- 12 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 13 of 17

SEVENTH COUNT AS TO DRY PRODUCTS 57. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 44 through 56 as if fully

set forth herein. 58. Dry Products, as the successor in interest by reorganization, merger,

continuation and/or continuation of product line to Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, assumed the liabilities of Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both, and SSNA is thereby entitled to indemnification and contribution for any judgment rendered against SSNA, including attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses, pursuant to the Product Liability Act and the common law. EIGHTH COUNT AS TO CIR 59. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 as if fully

set forth herein. 60. Upon information and belief, CIR, directly or indirectly, designed,

manufactured, assembled, marketed, distributed, and sold the Bakery Machine involved in this case. 61. CIR, directly or indirectly, is a designer, manufacturer, distributor, or seller

of the type of bakery machine involved in this case, including the one involved in this case, and is or was engaged in the business of selling the Bakery Machine involved in this case. 62. CIR, directly or indirectly, designs, produces, manufactures, distributes, or

sells bakery machines, such as the one involved in this case, including the one involved
- 13 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 14 of 17

in this case, with the reasonable expectation that the Bakery Machine would be used in the State of Connecticut and it was so used in the State of Connecticut. 63. If the allegations in the Complaint are true, which allegations are expressly

denied, then the accident, injury, and damages were due to the negligence, carelessness, wanton care, or culpable conduct of CIR, its agents, servants, or employees, which negligence was active, primary and the direct and immediate cause of his accident and injury, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature. 64. CIR, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the situation to

the exclusion of SSNA. 65. SSNA did not know of the negligence of CIR, its agents, servants, or

employees, had no reason to anticipate it, and could reasonably rely upon CIR, its agents, servants, or employees, not to be negligent. 66. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator, then CIR is liable to indemnify

SSNA for any judgment rendered against it along with reimbursing SSNA for all costs associated with this litigation, including attorneys' fees, expenses and other costs. NINTH COUNT AS TO CIR 67. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 17 and 60

through 62 as if fully set forth herein. 68. If the allegations of the Complaint are true, which is expressly denied, then

the accident, injury, and damages were due to the actions of CIR, its agents, servants,
- 14 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 15 of 17

or employees, which actions were active, primary, and the direct and immediate cause of the defective condition, the accident, injuries, and damages, as opposed to any actions on behalf of SSNA, which actions were passive and secondary in nature. 69. CIR, its agents, servants, or employees, were in control of the situation to

the exclusion of SSNA. 70. SSNA did not know of the actions of CIR, its agents, servants, or

employees, had no reason to anticipate them, and could reasonably rely on Sasib, its agents, servants, or employees, not to act in such a manner. 71. If SSNA is held liable to the Administrator for any of the Administrator's

claims, then SSNA is entitled to indemnification and contribution, including attorneys' fees, costs and expenses, from Sasib, pursuant to Connecticut's Product Liability Act, C.G.S. § 52-572(m), et seq. TENTH COUNT AS TO CIR 72. SSNA incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 59 through 71 as if fully

set forth herein. 73. CIR, as the successor in interest by reorganization, merger, continuation

and/or continuation of product line to Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both, assumed the liabilities of Sasib Food or Sasib Bakery, or both, and SSNA is thereby entitled to indemnification and contribution for any judgment rendered against SSNA, including attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses, pursuant to the Product Liability Act and the common law.
- 15 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 16 of 17

WHEREFORE, the defendant and third-party plaintiff, Sig Simonazzi North America, Inc., demands from the Third-Party Defendants, Sasib Food Machinery MV, S.p.A, Sasib Bakery Italia, S.p.A., Dry Products S.p.A., and Compagnie Industriali Riunite, S.p.A., jointly and severally: 1. 2. 3. Indemnification; Contribution; Payment of all costs associated with the defense of this action from its

inception, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, court costs, and expenses; 4. Such other and further relief as in equity or law may apply.

Dated at Hartford, Connecticut on this 21st day of January 2004.
THE THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF,

SIG SIMONAZZI NORTH AMERICA, INC.

By Joseph G. Fortner, Jr. Patrick M. Birney of
HALLORAN & SAGE LLP Fed. Bar #ct 04602 Fed. Bar #ct 19875 One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 (860) 522-6103

- 16 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00597-MRK

Document 25

Filed 01/22/2004

Page 17 of 17

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that on this 21st day of January 2004, I hereby mailed a copy of the foregoing to: Richard J. Sullivan, Esq. Sullivan & Sullivan, LLP 31 Washington St. Wellesley, MA 02481

Joseph G. Fortner, Jr.

492700.2(HSFP)

- 17 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105