Free Motion to Strike - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00194-CFD Document 47-2 Filed 08/O9/20652 CPédeCI‘ILbfY4€-”“$“QD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g Er=i if _ __ IRL? i
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT A R `'A' " A `
(GUS {lil ~q ,23 J2: 5 Q
THOMAS E. TYNDALL, ) _ _,
> = ,*%— _
Plaintiff, ) “ ‘ * I C-ir f.`i;';
)
v. )
)
NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING )
INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, ) Case No. 3 :03cvl 94(CFD)
DAVID W. LAUGHTON, PAUL V. WALSH, ) .
ANTHONY S. BONPANE, GEORGE W. )
CASHMAN, J. LEO BARRY, JOHN J . )
MCCARTHY, JR., WILLIAM M. VAUGHN III, )
and J. DAWSON CUNNINGHAM, ) ,
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE ALL DOCUMENTS FILED
ON JULY 19, 2005 p
These documents #43, 44, 45, 46 entered on the docket report July 19, 2005 were never served
on the Plaintiff in any manner thus making a response by August 9, 2005 a very difficult task.
Again the Plaintiff requests the court to strike and remove from the docket report as this is not l
the first improper filing made by the Defendant since the Court’s order #42 granting leave to file
for summary judgment.
On June 30, 2005 the Defendants did submit to Plaintiff a Motion for Summary Judgment
with a memorandum, statement of facts and an affidavit. However this Motion and
accompanying papers were certified as being sent to Plaintiff on June 30, 2005 but the envelope
they were sent in was not posted until July 5, 2005. Plaintiff did not receive this missal until July
7, 2005. On top of this flagrant abuse the Defendants did not send a copy to the court as ordered
by the Federal Court Rules (#5). (Copy of cover letter and envelope for above attached.)
l
I
I TI - —_ - ` —_ ` *7 *7 - —- . . L - ' ’ ·' ’ = ¤ *'#'=.-5.;;% -.’r ,*' =· —r2*1}*-'Y-'·r·'—-J£'·T'"*‘*:§3—Th-’
I —_ I I TT I I I TT ' —' ‘ ** - —— _ _. ' ' r' -' f r T'?’:,;'Q:,,;’r V7. " rr —·—;*gF1'·r'r.#`-7*;"»f"'*“`·*·‘J·—T2T-
a§.;Q.¥..g.s_§..scC.C....;.i‘1 YI Tfifffrrfig

Case 3:03-cv-00194-CFD Document 47-2 Filed 08/O9/2005 Page 2 of 4 s
Dated this €_ day of August, 2005.
Respectfully submitted,
By the Plaintiff Pro-Se,
igomas E. Tyndai]; I g

CERTIFICATE] OF SERVICE l
I, Thomas E. Tyndall, pro se plaintiff] certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing to be served E
to the following by M kl L, on August Q , 2005.
Thomas M. Brockett, Local Counsel for the Defendants
Robert M. Cheverie & Associates, P.C. g
333 East River Drive
East Hartford, CT 06108
United States District Court for the District of Co1mecticut
Abraham Ribicoff Building
Main Street
Hartford, CT
Plaintiff Pro—Se,
i domas E. Tyndall i
l

I -“*__—m-I—l
Case 3:03-cv-00194-CFD Document 47-2 Filed 08/O9/2005 Page 3 of 4 N
lliisrwaisae, Cnmipanni., & Zacia, EC, p
I Attorneys at Law I · l
177 Milk Street, Suite 300 · Boston, Massachusetts 02109 · , ·
_ 617-338-1976 `
‘ Fax 617-338-7070 Toll Free 800-338-6004 I
I
M1cnAaLA. Famasao ` JONATIJAN M. comi
[email protected] [email protected] i
CATHERINE M. CAMPBELL Mw ~¤·¤i¤·=<* *·· §¤¤y~=¤·*¤e* l
[email protected] an Wlsmmm
Also admitted in California l
ARTHUR G. 2AcR I
[email protected] l
‘ VIA CERTIFIED MAIL: 7004 2510 0000 8418 2600
June 30, 2005
Thomas E. Tyndall
P.O. Box 6041
Wolcott, CT 06716 1
Re: . Thomas E. Tyndall v. New England Teamsters & Trucking
‘ p Industry Pension Fund, Case No. 3:03cv194(CFD) l
Dear Mr. Tyndall: 1
Enclosed please find the following:
> Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s
Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment;
B> Local Rule 56(a)l Supplemental Statement of Facts; and `
$> Supplemental Affidavit of Charles Langone (with Exhibits A-D)
Very truly yours, -
ll./-I .-T 1 4 lt li ·/I I gl ` lv.
L-&~l0l.C1ll*lt9¤Jn¤l.. l lt Ek tr O
` J athan M. Conti
JMC:klb
l Enclosure
l

L E w-_ . S9 3-O3-cv-001 ________
E;-{*’L ’·-H · ·. ~._v:`I':ri_`_
· I " °"·=¢.j_-MQ-_1.`E-:_ii.___-M I M-I m*l-nrhm
_ . ‘ - -·~ - _.L - . ‘· ..
I · ‘ " '··· -· ;`·. " ‘l.,·1 :;_i;.; ‘: ._. ;\‘ z i-EI: :
|'··... . ‘ ·V··
{ Y °"‘ g EZ? “
*‘* cz: .~. .
J ` . E N N . ~
= m W Q n . . - .. ,.-. ::.1*-;: 1
f;_ :_~ Q ca " ·. 1 _‘ ‘ ‘·.,_ c `.·.-.. n
3 ' `f‘iLJ_4;i_§-;/Z,lay-;‘-,=r(.." -I‘- : .` `
E N
tx an 8 ’
x E °
Q . OO g
\ ¤ {D -r
*" +< ¤ 5: E
M ‘* °° N 1;;) Q; .
,_,...-< ' I
¤ Cj
2 0 E `
nan-intl "'¤ Q E
¤-nan-nunannn ru °_` S]
M
..._....... ¤¤
:I" { M
_ “° N g

S Q B 3
...·· D j' S f
A na mg TJ 2
Ln N "‘·-
1...... m E · ·¤ Q
.. E 0 § E. H °
3* `dh
E. LQ —< ·
n- °_ Vi W g J
{Ii § g nn E. .
FQ m E ig 3 A
. E? E ‘ H gg;. Q
‘¤-I E f
Qs