Free Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 55.1 kB
Pages: 1
Date: June 28, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 262 Words, 1,813 Characters
Page Size: 608.64 x 814.08 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22057/42.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut ( 55.1 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut
‘ t
D , Case 3:03-cv-00196FD Document 42 Filed 06/ZWOS Page 1 of 1
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A ”
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT fg? A
[jjj M
I ~;~¤L` " ‘ “> · F9 /8
\ i THOMAS E. TYNDALL, ) 57/gi. IC) j 58 Q
O ) _,' !€;$=;*I`?J;’?/e(;` ah
\,: Plaintiff, ) · ]"@"{’,./py'] OOg‘,y—,,_ I ,
% ) ti .» C s [
) pv. A ) ”
)
I
5 NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING ) NJA,)
INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, ) Case No. 3:03cv194(CFD)i
Q DAVID W. LAUGHTON, PAUL V. WALSH, ) _
° § {ANTHONY S. BUONPANE, GEORGE W. ) ` I `
xt §» CASHMAN, J. LEO BARRY, JOHN J. )
\ { { MCCARTHY, JR., WILLIAM M. VAUGHN III,` ) »
3 Q, W and J. DAWSON CUNNINGHAM, )
cm g Defendants. )
I J
Q
\ DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL
. Y tx MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Q % NOW COME Defendants, New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry .
ki { `*Pension Fund, et al, and respectfully request leave of Court to file a Supplemental Motion
3" Tfor Summary Judgment on the remaining issue before this Court. As grounds for their
g i ` Motion, Defendants state as follows:
_ v' . t ) 1. On April 29, 2004, this Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Partial
`$ `
Q · Summary Judgment on the issue of whether the Defendants reduction of
a` é kg A §,g,Plaintiff Thomas E. Tyndall’s monthly pension benefit altered, modified, or
3 ‘ » { {118 Plan-
` I ...._, ·~· 4 »,
.. "2*. ${IjI`ie only remaining issue before the Court folibwing its April 29, 2004 Order
Y mm zz: . ~,
:;·> ____ K , ~,
é % 0 gg {granting Defendant’s Motion is whether Plaintiff is entitled to interest on the
,t if » lump sum payment of benefits he received in October 2001 following the` ‘