Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 91.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: January 21, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 926 Words, 4,893 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20555/33.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Connecticut ( 91.4 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Connecticut
I #€______ l.....l.....___..I;
I 1 Cass 3¥02·¤\/-021 OLEGILG Document ss Filed 01/ erggmi Page 1 or 3
I ‘ ·‘ I r ;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO RT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICU I If
I AJUDU ISIVIAILA ADAIVIU, ET ALS : Cl\IlL · · TI NIINELII {G2 ISV 2104
(GLG) ~ ···‘ g _ _ I I I
’°'a‘"*’**S fj §· I,,; —`1‘1 I
I vs. ‘ I I
I PFIZER, INC. : DECE BER 22, 2003
Defendants I
I PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OBJEC ION TO MOTI N I
I FOR PERMISSION TO FILE A SURREPLY M MORAN D M I I
I Plaintiffs’ want to file a sprreply memorandum in p rt because theyI believe I
I the Defendant both inaccurately mischaracterized some f the cases that Ithe
I Plaintiff cited in its reply memorandum and the Plaintiffs ants to critique $evera|
of the new cases cited by the Defendant in its reply mem randum.
The Defendant’s second argument is illusory claimi g that this court needs
to decide the motion to transfer before a February 13, 200 court date with Judge
Pauley in New York. It appears as if Judge Pauley is only aving a scheduling
conference on February 13, 2004. Thus there are several easons why thaIt date
is irrelevant to Plaintiffs’ request to file a surreply; 1. On th t date it only apI>ears
to be a scheduling conference. The Defendant indicates it s only "to determine I
the future course of the proceedings? Thus that in and of i self would not sIem to I
l require that our District Court in Connecticut decide the IVI ion to Transfer In _
advance of that date; 2. It obviously mean the New York c se will not really be I
significantly progressing on that date itself; 3. By allowing t e Plaintiffs to file a
surreply and even file it by January 7, 2004 would still give his court a I
reasonable lead time to make at decision before the February 13, 2004 assuming I
I
aw B. Aursc HULE » I
509 <;:Aivii=·eEi.i. AVENUE, i=·.0. Box eos, w¤:s·r Haven, ¤:0i~.ii~.iEc·ricU·r oeste-oeoe · rzoei 932- 464, esa-1400 • JURIS NUMBER I0O877 I
. I
I I I
I I I
2 I I
I I
II
L I I I

’ Case 3:02-cv-02104-GIG Document 33 Filed 01/ 6/QBO4 Page 2 of 3
arguendo that the decision needs to be made by that dat . If necessary it is
conceivable the Plaintiff could file a reply by December 31, 2003 although
counseI’s scheduled surgery islstill being delayed by an l sue of an infection and
I a potential blood clot. As of this undersigned writing but u able to sign this Reply
I to Defendant' Objection, the undersigned has already dra ted a surreply which
I should be under ten pages. Although I now had the surg ry today, DecenIber
'
I 22"°' it is possible that I could get to the office edit it and fi e It earlier than Ilanuary I
I 7, 2004. However, because I am in the hospital at this m ment I could not sign
I this PIaintiffs’ reply to defendant’s objection. However I .= nt the court to I e
aware that I could file this surreply in a timely fashion. I I
‘ I
I
Respectfully submitted, .
ALTSCHULER :. ALTSCHULER I
FOR THE P · INTIFFS I
· M » lfl l I
BY ji; ··* / _ lv , ~ /.» . ..... ,,,,__\
Ri ard ·° s uler
Federal B r No.07212
509 Cam bell Avenue
P.O. Box 06
West Hav n, CT 06516
I (203) 932 6464
. I I
I
I
‘ I
I
LAW OFFICES ALTSCHULER 6: ALTSCHULE I
509 CAMPBELL AVENUE, F'.O. BOX 606, WEZST HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 05516-0606 • (203) 32- 64, 932-1400 · JURIS NUMBER 100577 I
I _ I I
I I I I I
. I I I
. I I I
. I I I
E
I
I I I
I I
I I
I I I
I
. I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I I I

` 7
I
.. . i` Case 3:02-cv-0210¢§G}.G Document 33 Filed 01/ i/2B04 Page 3 of 3
{ QE. 3 · `. _
l This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed [email protected] day of
De‘ 3T“postage prepaid to all counsel of record as follows:
2(l\k,r»r’l’l’°;¤* Qitri ct?
`· Edward R. Sc field, Esq. (ct 00455)
Zeldes, Needle & Cooper, P.C.
, 1000 Lafayette Boulevard
Post Office Box 1740 1
Bridgeport, CT 06601-1740 l
Steven Glickstein (ct 15725) l
l James D. Herschleln (ct 24326) l
l Kaye Scholer LLP |
i 425 Park Avenue ~ l
New York, New York 10022 N
Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer, Inf:. l
The Honorable Gerard L. Goettel [
; United States District Court l
l District of Connecticut ,
’ 14 Cottage Place l
J Waterbury, CT 06702 ~
/ » Y ;e ‘ T /.ar;:#t”
¤" ` V E , N4 ,/" ,4%/ [*115}*
‘ .»-·‘` .. l
,4..- ;;:/ 1,,/ ) ,,_...» I l
. »»r7 — rrrr — l
-··l ' L SCHUL ° **·— ,
I ]
l
* l
LAW OFFICES ALTSCHULER 8: ALTSCHULE
509 CAMPBELL AVENUE, F’,O. BOX GDB. WEST HAVEN. CONNECTICUT 0651643605 · (203) 932- 454, 932-1400 • JURI5 NUMBER 100877 E
l l l
A l l ll
l E l W
l I 1 l
l l .
1 g \ \ . l
L l l
T i l l
l l l
1 ‘ l l l
, i l
j l l
. l l l
T l ll
2 5 l l
. @ l l
2 F l l
l l .
A l l l
~ ~ l l
I Q l