Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

II C II 3-O —IIII——ImIIII—I—I"`""_"I`I”‘II"I—*‘·*—·**·——·I·——·-—I
. ase . 2-cv-02101-AVC Document 20 I. Filed 11/06/2003 Page 1 of1 I
(2) `I O QC] UQI OlJ+w\~trw;II·x·¤ I
% I UNITED STATES DIST ICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONN CTICUT I
I I
CYNTHIA WELFARE, I : CIVIL Action No. I
I 1 3:02CV2’I01(AVC) - I
Plaintiff, I ;
I Z I
PETER OKIMEARA THE COMMISSIONER OEI
THE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL I 2
RETARDATION FOR THE STATE OF I : ‘ `“EI I
CONNECTICUT, I I 1 November 5, 20031 rg I
Defendant ; __I_ if ;lI I
I : III. '·o_ P}, .. I
I III II I
I
Q"
PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FO AN EX NSI NOF I I
DISCOVERY AND PRE-T IAL DEADLIN S I
The Complaint in this matter was filed n November 27, 2002. Per the
I
Court’s order, discovery is set to close on No ember 13, 2003. The parties I
,.j request an additional ninety days to complet discovery, and asks that the other
an
U; pre—trial deadlines in this matter be similarly xpanded.
.I 5 -
I-QTI; I This is the second request for an expdnsion of the discovery period and
‘IIII·`IfI 3 I
. IPI IL ij pre-trial deadlines; however, the parties are cIurrently briefing Defendants Rule
cl \,IigI, · :> I
¤·¤ ¤I~ sit ¤ I _
Q I!-I `{ I U 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, so the expansion would cause no umdue delay In the I
gc II I , I
M ll ·I ' >
O IIIIIQ II ·¤ trial of tlgljs matter. Plaintiffs counsel has co suited with Defendants counsel,
· IEI * ~ " _ _ _ I
Q IJIII ,..I Iwho h& statrtighat he joins In this request.
0 ~ I gg I'·~**=J I
01 I .0 cis I I
_' _E.’Q*§;.E I
TI § IIIIIIIIIII I
(IJ EI ¤::~» ' -·£.' I
.¤ ci In I I
E DG Z2 I I
g 0 I I
o o I ’
z TD I I
I
I I
I I
I I
- - . . II IIII --IIe .I II IIE - · - - I
`III A
Q I I` I- - .,‘I- -- I . -. - I. I I I -