Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 23.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 26, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 340 Words, 2,417 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/979/288.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims ( 23.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:01-cv-00591-FMA

Document 288

Filed 06/26/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS __________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Defendant, ) ) PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF ) FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, ) ) Defendant-Intervenor ) __________________________________________) KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al.,

No. 01-591 L

Judge Francis M. Allegra

AMICUS NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM AS TO PLAINTIFFS' CONTRACT CLAIMS Amicus Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. ("NRDC") respectfully seeks leave, to the extent necessary, to file a reply memorandum in response to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief in Response to the Brief Amicus Curiae of Natural Resources Defense Council and to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' Contract Claims. The Court's Order of December 20, 2005 authorizes previously participating amici "to file briefs with regard to [the motion for summary judgment]," and that Order arguably encompasses the reply memorandum which NRDC is filing with the Court together with this motion. If so, this motion is completely unnecessary. If not, NRDC now seeks leave to file its reply memorandum. NRDC respectfully submits that the reply memorandum will assist the court in resolving whether the plaintiffs' contract claims are barred by the sovereign acts and/or unmistakability doctrines and, specifically, the relevance of Klamath Project subsidies in applying the sovereign acts and/or unmistakability doctrines. To NRDC's knowledge, the legal relevance of project subsidies is not being addressed by either defendant or defendant-intervenor. NRDC has coordinated with defendant-intervenor in order to avoid duplicative filings in response to plaintiffs' submissions. -1-

Case 1:01-cv-00591-FMA

Document 288

Filed 06/26/2006

Page 2 of 2

For these reasons, NRDC respectfully requests that the Court grant leave to file a reply memorandum. Respectfully submitted,

John D. Echeverria Sanju Misra Georgetown Environmental Law & Policy Institute Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 662-9850 Hamilton Candee Natural Resources Defense Council 111 Sutter Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 777-0220 Counsel for Amicus Curiae NRDC

June 26, 2006

-2-