Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

\.`\`\ · - '- - ` , f 1
1 .05 m j 00004 IVI PT Document 1 1U·S` IBLeIpm0gI4((%4142(0f0`?uStlé::§age 1 0 n
·‘0‘
United States Azmmey
District of Delaware
1007 Orange Stream Suite 700 {302) 573-6277
ao. eax 2046 nmsez; 573.6125
Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2046
- May 4, 2007
By ECF
The Honorable Mary Pat Thynge
United States District Court
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 King Street l
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Re: United States v. Lynn Morcz,
Case N0. 05-04M
Dear Judge Thynge:
n As we discussed earlier today, I write to confirm on the record that because of an unfortunate
chain of events involving the Clerk’s Office and the Probation Office, the Court granted the
defendant’s motion for termination of probation based on the mistaken understanding that the
government did not oppose the motion. As your clerk explained to me, he assumed the defendant’s
probation officer spoke on behalf of the U.S. Attorney’ s Office when the probation officer expressed
his non—opposition to the motion. In fact, however, the probation officer had not consulted with our
office and did not believe he was speaking on our office’s behalf So that the record is clear, our
office would have opposed the motion for termination.
Respectfully submitted, Q
COLM F. CO
United States Attorney
CFC:tzn
- cc: Edmund D. Lyons, Esq.

Case 1:05-mj-00004-MPT

Document 11

Filed 05/04/2007

Page 1 of 1