ESGW ?`w0?` ¢V " “ ‘ »· ·“* W -»». »
-· gz, I- I., T K U Tg
\;:;`;. \ _-;¥€` gg ‘ Fi-,t E. I ` w
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE . _
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE ) T` ) __ I
COMPANY and PACK ANDIPRO_QESISI,_ I) _ _ CT I
INC., )
- I __.I`
Plaintiffs, ) ’
I .J= I
v_ ) Civil Action No. 05-22-KAJ I
I ) Consolidated W » »` _ `
MALY YAN, I ·II¤sI si
I * ’
Defendant. ) -
ORDER _ U
At Wilmington this 19th day of October, 2005,
For the reasons set forth by the Court during the teleconference held on
October 18, 2005,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to quash subpoenas
(DII. 60) is DENIED.
Q
’ QI /
UNITE STATES JUDGE
'T`'''. ... ., · ...- ..-. ..
4 I? I
`‘‘‘‘
OCT 2 5 EGU5 I
‘ L`- ... . I I
- ,7+ -3 . I- , __ . _
- ~?—~ ` Y * 2 ._ _ "_ _` K _ 0 " - * in ` 0` ` 4 "`â€""
Case 1:05gcx; - ocufnent 70 Fnled 10/25/2005 _0 Page 2 0f 2
N\.‘3& Q @..2
5. r. ,._ c. 0-·
¢ . E g
[ 2 -· 'Z 'JJ
U ¢ ¤ • 0 Q L`.
7 0 c . m *.21
‘ <:> P =‘ •'* 2 ,0
M 2.* .5 °° *3.
X- ` __ G
0 . ° 2 ¢_g_ Eg (rz **· .
Z _ 'Q. °° rv U 9 :=
r . v; i W "" 0 '
r - w an 4* E2
Q ’ z ·l -1 O
. 0 -4-. ~ ¤" ·s· —
T v> »-— 2 •·* 2
. ~= I \:> W O 7:
°: ` = U O
1 hi Q G
dp °`° '1
Z I U1 ¥'°
0 -..1 ¤¤
0 $
0 . a
00 _ 1_
; + U) O O
0 i- N : 5 .
· r gg Gl E; 0
gl fg O O
g »·· *6 n: ‘U 'U
V p z5¤2
0_ m __, B nw
»
- 5 0. " J> :21
I L. ¤·*°`,¤ · - ‘€ I l Z3 gg ? " n
g. ‘ =¢ — ‘ ‘ ` 0 __, 0 ·¤
;\ 1 F * g F'. 3
2 2 5 $
0: sg
0 T;
_ 9, /0/‘i< = L /.;.0,
] ` E {.0 rg; -0.,
0, /_. l = *5 Fi- Q
“ - *"â€"°’· - . - - tc 0
=?`· §`F’ 0 `£" ` .‘‘` ____->
-·¤= 0- ‘ ‘‘- - - -
Q E?] 3 -0 < ·
1:... $ -.0__ 1 » ;§. 0i;;.-#5 ;
{ Z'. ¤: 0 ‘ 0
T ; : wc -i · 0- :§ * ‘·a-‘
2: 0 va Pak? ,; ’ ._ .
‘ ¤=‘E“_j¤: " - 1
ua ¤L·.Z’ ap; - 0 A .
$.‘z·;·2&?. § > . - .
' *' ¤=¤ Q -` -0 . .
0 ‘ ·°é‘....J?=`$.‘L · T " 7 ‘
- °§..n·""·,;§ a ·‘-‘ *:0 ‘ `.
' [ji] • "- ` ‘ 0
0 UQ 0 _00._ E 0
__ 4 *1 D m P 2 , 0 `_
U1 Mr 7 '·- ` " - H ` V 7 i _ 0 .’ =-g_.__* ‘:_r¥·¥
. 0 0 .2 0 0 1 ; ‘· ?
" °¤· ._0_i;%i `“
0.. :;+;.2 â€'' ?A.'
0 - /`0 ‘*
_i
f- V