Free Amended Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :05-cr-OOOO1-JJF Document 58 Filed 06/O4/2008 Page 1 of 1
QAO 247 (02f08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of Delaware
United States of America )
v. )
. . ) Case No: 1:05-CR-00001-001 (JJF)
Damn A' Glbbs ) Usivt Na; 04935-015
Date of Previous Judgment: August 13, 2005 ) Edson Bostic
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applieable) ) Defendant’s Attomey
Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of X the defendant CI the Director of the Bureau of Prisons lj the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
EI DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the lastjudgment issued) of 121 months is reduced to 120 .
I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)
Previous Offense Level: 29 Amended Offense Level: 27
Criminal History Category: IV Criminal History Category: IV
Previous Guideline Range: 121 to 151 months Amended Guideline Range: 120 to 125 months
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.
Other (explain):
III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Except as provided above, al1 provisions ofthe judgment dated 8/ 13/2005 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Order Date: Li ZOCK 5
dge’s signature
Effective Date: U.S. District Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
(if different from order date) Printed name and title