Free Proposed Plea Agreement - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 12.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 22, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 700 Words, 4,374 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9044/7-2.pdf

Download Proposed Plea Agreement - District Court of Delaware ( 12.0 kB)


Preview Proposed Plea Agreement - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-mj-00073-MPT

Document 7-2

Filed 09/22/2005

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CALVIN DAVIS, Defendant. : : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 04-73M

MEMORANDUM OF PLEA AGREEMENT Pursuant to discussions between the United States of America, by and through its attorney, Beth Moskow-Schnoll, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and on behalf of and with the consent and knowledge of Colm F. Connolly, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and the defendant, Calvin Davis, by and through his attorney, Christopher Koyste, Esquire, the following agreement is hereby entered into by the respective parties: 1. The defendant, Calvin Davis, agrees to plead guilty to Count One of the

Information charging him with a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1030(a)(2), computer fraud, in that, while employed by Discover Bank, the defendant did knowingly and intentionally exceed his authorized access to the bank's computer files, thereby obtaining information contained in a financial record of Discover Bank. This violation carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for not more than 1 year, a $100,000.00 fine, 1 year of supervised release, and a $25.00 special assessment. 2. The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently admits the following facts:

Case 1:04-mj-00073-MPT

Document 7-2

Filed 09/22/2005

Page 2 of 3

(a) in or around January, 2004, after viewing the account information of A.L. during the course of his employment with Discover Bank, he used that account information to take over A.L.'s Discover Card account; (b) between January 21, 2004, and January 29, 2004, using A.L.'s Discover Card account that he had taken over, he made and attempted to make purchases and cash advances totaling $2,331.74; (c) in or around February, 2004, after viewing the account information of J.B. during the course of his employment with Discover Bank, he used that account information to take over J.B.'s Discover Card account; (d) in or around December , 2003, after viewing the account information of W.W. during the course of his employment with Discover Bank, he used that account information to take over W.W.'s Discover Card account; and (e) in or around December, 2003, using W.W.'s Discover Card account that he had taken over, he made and attempted to make purchases and cash advances totaling $2,559.10. 3. sentencing. 4. At sentencing, the United States agrees to move to dismiss Counts Two and Three The defendant agrees to pay the $25 special assessment at the time of

of the Information. 5. The defendant acknowledges that the actual loss to Discover Bank as a result

of his conduct was $3,060.85. The defendant agrees to pay restitution in that amount to Discover Bank. 6. The parties hereby agree and stipulate that, for sentencing guideline purposes, the

intended loss to Discover Bank was $4,890.84. The defendant understands that at sentencing the Court must consider the United States Sentencing Guidelines and take them into account in exercising its discretion to determine the appropriate sentence and must also consider the other factors bearing on an appropriate sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a). The defendant

Case 1:04-mj-00073-MPT

Document 7-2

Filed 09/22/2005

Page 3 of 3

further understands that the Government will recommend that the Court impose a sentence consistent with the sentencing range set forth by the sentencing guidelines. 7. It is further agreed by the parties that this Memorandum supersedes all prior

promises, representations, and statements of the undersigned parties; that this Memorandum may be modified only in writing signed by all the parties; and that any and all promises, representations and statements made prior to or after this Memorandum are null and void and have no effect whatsoever, unless they comport with the subsequent written modification requirements of this paragraph. COLM F. CONNOLLY United States Attorney

BY: Calvin Davis Defendant Beth Moskow-Schnoll Assistant United States Attorney

Christopher Koyste Attorney for Defendant

Dated:

AND NOW, this

day of

, 2005, the foregoing Memorandum of

Plea Agreement is hereby (accepted) (rejected) by this Court.

Honorable Mary Pat Thynge United States Magistrate Judge