PROB 12 (02/05-D/CO)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO U. S. A. vs. Gordon Anthony Hill Docket Number: 01-cr-00382-LTB-01 Petition on Supervised Release COMES NOW, Pete Stein, probation officer of the court, presenting an official report upon the conduct and attitude of Gordon Anthony Hill who was placed on supervision by the Honorable Lewis T. Babcock sitting in the court at Denver, Colorado, on the 17th day of May, 2002, who fixed the period of supervision at three years, and imposed the general terms and conditions theretofore adopted by the court and also imposed special conditions and terms as follows: 1. The defendant shall participate in a program of testing and treatment for drug abuse, as directed by the probation officer, until such time as the defendant is released from the program by the probation officer. The defendant shall abstain from the use of alcohol or other intoxicants during the course of treatment. The defendant will be required to pay the cost of treatment as directed by the probation officer. The defendant shall not incur new credit charges or open additional lines of credit without the approval of the probation officer, unless he is in compliance with the periodic payment obligations imposed pursuant to the court' s judgment and sentence.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS:
(If short insert here: if lengthy write on separate sheet and attach)
See attachment hereto and herein incorporated by reference. PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER the issuance of a summons for the defendant to appear at a compliance review hearing. ORDER OF THE COURT Considered and ordered this 16th day of May , 2007, and ordered filed and made a part of the record in the above case. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. s/ Pete Stein Pete Stein Probation Officer s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock Chief United States District Judge Place: Denver, Colorado Date: May 14, 2007
Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT On June 23, 2006, the conditions of supervised release were read and explained to the defendant. On that date he acknowledged in writing that the conditions had been read to him, that he fully understood the conditions, and that he was provided a copy of them. The term of supervised release commenced June 23, 2006. This petition is based on the following facts: Since his release on supervision on June 23, 2006, the defendant has been delinquent with his restitution/special assessment obligations. The defendant has been unemployed or under-employed since November 2006. He was discharged from substance abuse treatment for unexcused absences. Defendant attempted to purchase a vehicle in violation of the special condition prohibiting him from incurring new credit. He has failed to maintain a residence. As a result of the aforementioned, the Probation Department recommends a compliance review hearing be set to address the defendant' failure to comply with the conditions of supervised release. s