Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 18.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 24, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 867 Words, 5,330 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8818/14.pdf

Download Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware ( 18.0 kB)


Preview Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01466-GMS

Document 14

Filed 03/21/2005

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ROY ERNEST RICHMOND III, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 04-1466 GMS

DENNIS DIORIO, Defendant.

SCHEDULING ORDER The Court having conducted a scheduling conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(b) on February 22, 2005, and the parties having determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement, voluntary mediation or binding arbitration; IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Discovery. All discovery in this case shall be initiated so that it will be completed on or before July 29, 2005. a. Discovery Matters. Should counsel find they are unable to resolve a discovery matter, the party seeking the relief shall contact chambers at (302) 573-6470 to schedule a telephone conference. Not less than forty-eight hours prior to the conference, by hand delivery or facsimile at (302) 573-6472, the party seeking relief shall file with the court a letter agenda not to exceed two (2) pages outlining the issues in dispute. Should the court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion of the telephone conference, the court shall order the party seeking relief to file with the court a TWO PAGE LETTER, exclusive of exhibits, describing the issues in contention. The responding party shall file within five (5) days from the date of service of the opening letter an

Case 1:04-cv-01466-GMS

Document 14

Filed 03/21/2005

Page 2 of 3

answering letter of no more than TWO PAGES. The party seeking relief may then file a reply letter of no more than TWO PAGES within three (3) days from the date of service of the answering letter. 2. Confidential Information and Papers filed under Seal. Should counsel find it will be necessary to apply to the court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the disclosure of confidential information, they should confer and attempt to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order and submit it to the court within 10 days from the date of this order. When filing papers under seal, counsel should deliver to the Clerk an original and two copies of the papers. If after making a diligent effort the parties are unable to agree on the contents of the joint proposed protective order, then they shall follow the dispute resolution process outlined in paragraph 3(a). 3. Settlement Conference. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636, this matter is referred to the United States Magistrate for the purpose of exploring the possibility of a settlement. If the parties agree that the possibility of settlement may be enhanced by such referral, the parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Thynge to schedule a settlement conference with counsel and clients. 4. Case Dispositive Motions. All case dispositive motions and an opening brief and affidavits, if any, in support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before August 12, 2005. Briefing will be presented pursuant to the Court's Local Rules, unless the parties agree to an alternative briefing schedule. Any such agreement shall be in writing and filed with the Court for the Court's approval. 5. Applications by Motion. Except as provided in this Order or for matters relating to scheduling, any application to the Court shall be by written motion filed with the Clerk. Unless otherwise requested by the Court, counsel shall not deliver copies of papers or correspondence to Chambers. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement required by Local Rule 7.1.1.

Case 1:04-cv-01466-GMS

Document 14

Filed 03/21/2005

Page 3 of 3

6. Oral Argument. If the Court believes that oral argument is necessary, the Court will schedule a hearing Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.4. 7. Pretrial Conference. On February 14, 2006, the Court will hold a Pretrial Conference in Chambers with counsel beginning at 10:00 a.m. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial disclosure requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). Thirty (30) days before the joint proposed pretrial order is due, plaintiff's counsel shall forward to defendant's counsel a draft of the pretrial order containing the information plaintiff proposes to include in the draft. Defendant's counsel shall, in turn, provide to plaintiff's counsel any comments on the plaintiff's draft as well as the information defendant proposes to include in the proposed pretrial order. Motions in limine: No party shall file more than ten (10) motions in limine. Briefs (opening, answering and reply) on all motions in limine shall be filed by January 17, 2006. Opening and answering briefs shall not exceed five (5) pages and reply briefs shall not exceed three (3) pages. The parties shall file with the court the joint proposed final pretrial order with the information required by the form of Final Pretrial Order which accompanies this Scheduling Order on or before January 17, 2006. 8. Trial. This matter is scheduled for a 3-day Jury Trial beginning at 9:00 a.m. on March 13, 2006. 9. Scheduling. The parties shall direct any requests or questions regarding the scheduling and management of this matter to Chambers at (302) 573-6470.

Date: March 21, 2005

/s/ Gregory M. Sleet UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE