Free Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 37.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 30, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 318 Words, 2,040 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8768/75.pdf

Download Judgment - District Court of Delaware ( 37.8 kB)


Preview Judgment - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01416-JJF Document 75 Filed O3/29/2006 Page1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for :
the Use and Benefit of JERSEY :
SHORE AUTOMATION, INC., a New :
Jersey corporation, ;
Plaintiff, :
v. Q Civil Action No. O4—l4l6—JJF
CHUGACH SUPPORT SERVICES, :
INC., an Alaskan corporation, ;
and SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY :
OF AMERICA, a Washington :
corporation, :
Defendants. :
FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2006, the parties entered a
stipulation (D I. 72), which provided that Plaintiff Jersey Shore
Automation, Inc. {“Jersey Shore") was to have new counsel enter
an appearance within 30 days of the execution of the stipulation;
WHEREAS, the stipulation provided that if new counsel did
not enter an appearance within 30 days, the Court would, inter
alia, grant and enter final judgment in favor of Defendants;
WHEREAS, new counsel for Plaintiff has not entered an
appearance;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant/Counterclaim
Plaintiff Chugach Support Services, Inc. (“Chugach”) and
against Jersey Shore on Chugach’s Counterclaim Count I for
breach of contract. Jersey Shore shall immediately remit to

Case 1:04-cv-01416-JJF Document 75 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 2 of 2
Chugach $2,552,533. This judgment bears interest at the
rate of 4.77% annually from the date of the entry of
judgment.
2. Judgment is entered in favor of Chugach and Defendant Safeco
Insurance Company of America (“Safeco”) and against Jersey
Shore, dismissing with prejudice all of Jersey Shore’s
claims against Chugach and Safeco.
3. All of Chugach’s and Safeco’s remaining claims against
Jersey Shore are dismissed with prejudice, subject, however,
to Chugach's and Safeco’s right to proceed with these claims
should the Court grant relief from judgment pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 or 60.
March g, 2006 x 2, _
UNL T D ST T DISTRICT J E