Free Order on Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 36.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 16, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 272 Words, 1,706 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8690/215.pdf

Download Order on Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Delaware ( 36.8 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for More Definite Statement - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF Document 215 Filed 06/16/2005 Page 1 012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., and )
HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES )
INC., )
I
Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 04-1338-KAJ
I
v- I
I
APPLE COMPUTER, INC.; ARGUS A/K/A )
HARTFORD COMPUTER GROUP, INC.; )
CASIO COMPUTER CO., LTD.; CASIO, INC.; )
CONCORD CAMERAS; DELL INC.; EASTMAN )
KODAK COMPANY; FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., )
LTD.; FUJI PHOTO FILM U.S.A., INC.; )
FUJITSU LIMITED; FUJITSU AMERICA, INC.; )
FUJITSU COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF )
AMERICA, INC.; KYOCERA WIRELESS )
CORP.; MATSUSHITA ELECTRICAL )
INDUSTRIAL CO.; MATSUSHITA )
ELECTRICAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA; )
NAVMAN NZ LIMITED; NAVMAN U.S.A. INC.; )
OLYMPUS CORPORATION; OLYMPUS )
AMERICA, INC.; PENTAX CORPORATION; )
PENTAX U.S.A., INC.; SONY CORPORATION; )
SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA; SONY )
ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB; )
SONY ERICSSON MOBILE )
COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.; TOSHIBA )
CORPORATION; and TOSHIBA AMERICA, )
INC., )
I
Defendants. )
ORDER
For the reasons set forth by the Court during the hearing today on
Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. and Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.’s motion to transfer (Docket
Item ["D.|."] 97) and motion for more definite statement, or for stay, or for dismissal (D.I.
95)

Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF Document 215 Filed 06/16/2005 Page 2 012
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants, Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.
and Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.'s motion to transfer (D.I. 97) is DENIED, and the
motion for more definite statement, or for stay, or for dismissal (D.I. 95) is DENIED.
( ‘`= Z ali ` # /
U TED TATES ISTRI i r GE .
June 16, 2005 - L,//{
Wilmington, Delaware
2