Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF
)LVK
5LFKDUGVRQ SF
Document 124
Filed 06/07/2005
Page 1 of 1
6XLWH 1 0DUNHW 6WUHHW SR %R[ :LOPLQJWRQ 'HODZDUH 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOH :HE 6LWH ZZZIUFRP
! % $ %! ¤9¤ 8"¤ ¤§¤5¢© ¨310 )( 7 6 ¥¡4 2
CB"9STQR @ S @
¢#Gp8gfi#qVpE C U EG HG
¤ ¤#"¤ '& % $!! ¢© ¤¦§¦¤¢ ¨ ¨¡£ ¥£¡
June 7, 2005 VIA E-FILING The Honorable Kent A. Jordan United States District Court for the District of Delaware 844 N. King Street Lockbox 10 Wilmington, DE 19801 Re: Honeywell Int'l. Inc. et al. v. Audiovox Corp., et al., C.A. No. 04-1337-KAJ (D.Del. 2004)
a
H P E P QBFCDBI U X @ @ S TBWVB"¢U3R §9T¢iDPg8G9#"C ` U S S @ h H f SG fDYuvQPBgY8tFCTrV R H E e HG s @ b X P ` TQ¢aV§YH U P e U R H @ Q§#G3dBcC HG E A 8BFCDB@
Dear Judge Jordan: Defendants Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc. (collectively, "Nokia") respectfully request clarification of the Court's Memorandum Order of May 18, 2005 (D.I. 119) with respect to Nokia's Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint (D.I. 57) seeking to implead two of its liquid crystal display manufacturers, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. ("Philips") and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. ("Samsung SDI"). Nokia attached its proposed third-party complaint to its motion. D.I. 58; see also D.I. 57. The Court stated in footnote 4 of the Memorandum Order that Philips and Samsung SDI "have been named in a third party complaint . . . ." The Court also referenced Nokia's motion in the appendix to its Memorandum Order, but did not expressly grant or deny Nokia's motion. See Order of May 18, 2005, at 10-11 (D.I. 119). Briefing on the motion has been completed. See D.I. 66 (Honeywell's opposition in part), D.I. 93 (Nokia's reply). The Court may also recall that counsel for Philips and Samsung SDI were present at the May 16th scheduling conference. Hrg. Tr. (May 16, 2005) at 50:14-51:8 (Ex. A) (D.I. 120). Nokia respectfully requests clarification from the Court as to whether its Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint is granted. Respectfully, /s/ William J. Marsden, Jr. William J. Marsden, Jr. WJM:sb cc: Clerk of the Court (via hand delivery and e-filing) Counsel of record (via e-filing)