Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 1 of 36

EXHIBIT B

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 2 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 3 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 4 of 36

EXHIBIT C

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 5 of 36

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

STACIE OBERTS E .
(612) 349-8235

November 30,2004
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL

Mr. Brad Lyerla Marshall Gerstein & B o r n LLP Sears Tower, 63rd Floor Chicago, IL 60606

Re:
Dear Brad:

Honeywell v. Apple, et a1 Our File No. 019896-0229

Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confirmed that the following Navman products infringe the `371 patent: Navman PiN Pocket PC Navman iCN5 10 Pocket PC
As I explained in our discussion yesterday, this is by no means a comprehensive list of Navman's infkinging products. Honeywell's infiingement assertion against Navman relates to all products manufactured by Navman which contain LCD modules which practice the claimed invention.

Sincerely, ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. Stacie E. Oberts SE0:jw cc: Matthew L. Woods

...

... .
.. .

ATLANTA

BOSTON

LOS ANGELES

; ...... ... MINNEAPOLIS . _.

i

NAPLES

SAINT PAUL

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 6 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 7 of 36

.2015
!;339-41 L81

. -

STACIE OBERTS E.
(612) 349-8235

December 3,2004 KIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL

Mr.Steven J. Rizzi
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 FiRh Avenue New York, NY 10153-01 19

Re:

Honqwell Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc. et a1 Civil Action No. 04-1338 O r File No.: 019896-0229 u

Da Mr. Rizzi: er
I write in response to your letter of December 1 to Martin R. Lueck regarding the above referenced action.
Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confirmed that the following products that are lcrc manufactured and sold by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. and Matsushita Eeti Corporation of America (collectively "Matsushita") infringe the `371 patent: G51M X70 Toughbook Y2

This list is by no means a comprehensive list of Matsushita's infiinging products. Honeywell's infringement assertion against Matsushitarelates to all products manufactured and sold by Matsushita which contain LCD modules which practice the claimed invention. Information regarding additional Matsushita products that infiinge the `371 patent will be identified during the discovery phase of this litigation.

20115897.1
T L
A

N T

A . 8 0

S T 0 N

.L

0 5

A

N G E

L E S

IM

1 N

N E

A

P 0 L I SI N A Y L E S .5 A 1 N T P A U L

* W

A S

H I N G T 0 N, D.

C

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 8 of 36

Steven J. Rizzi December 3,2004 Page 2
Very truly yours, ROBINS, KAPLAN,MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

Stacie E.Oberts
SE0:jw
cc: Matthew L. Woods

20 115897.1

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 9 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 10 of 36

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

STACE E OBRRTS . (612) 349-8235

December 6,2004

vL4 FACSIMILE m d US.MAIL
Mr. Bany W. Graham Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP 1300 I Street NW Washington, DC 20005-33 15
Re:
Honeywell Inc. t? Apple Computer, Inc. et a1 O r File No.: 019896-0229 u

Dear Mr. Graham:

I Write in response to your letter to Mri Lueck dated November 30,2004. atn
We disagree with your assertion that Honeywell's First Amended Complaint is vague and ambiguous with respect to the allegations of Nikon Corp.'s and Nikon Inc.'s infringement of the `37 1patent. Nevertheless, in the spirit ofcooperation, we are willing to identi@ the followingNikon products that Honeywell has alrcady confirmed infiinges at least claim 3 of the `371 patent: Coolpix 2100 and Coolpix 3 100.

This is by no means intended to be a comprehensive list of Nikon's infringing products.
Honeywell's infringement assertion against Nikon extends to all products manufactured or sold by Nikon C o p and Nikon Inc. that practice the claimed invention. Information regarding additional Nikon products that infringe the `371 patent will be identified during the discovery phase of this litigation.

You also have requested an identification of the claim or claims of the `371 patent which Honeywell is asserting against Nikon's products. As Honeywell stated in its First Amended Complaint, Nikon's products infringe one or more of the claims of the `371 patent. There is no requirement that Honeywell limit the claims it is asserting at this state ofthe litigation.

T L

A

N T ~Wl$747d N . L o s o

A

N c e L

E

s

I

Y I

H N E

A P

o L

I

S IH

A

P L e s

. S A I N T

P A u L

.w

A

s w

I N t T o N. D .

c

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 11 of 36

BarryW.Graham December 6,2004 Page 2

very truly yours,
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
Stacie E Oberts .

SEO@
cc: Matthew L. Woods

20115747.1

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 12 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 13 of 36

8w LASALLE AVENUE

STACIE E OBERTS .

(612) 349-8235

December 9,2004

FACSiMILE and U.S. MAIL
Mr. James M. Olsen Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP 1007 North Orange Street P.O.Box 2207 Wilmhgton DE 19899 Re:
Honeywell Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc. et a1 O r File No.: 019896-0229 u

Dear h4r. Olsen:
I write in response to your letter to Martin R. Lueck regarding the above-referenced

action. Pursuant to your request, Honeywell is willing to identi@the following Sony Ericsson products that Honeywell has already confirmed infiinges the '371 patent: 2200.

This is by no means intended to be a comprehensive list of Sony Ericsson's infringing products. Honeywell's infringement assertion against Sony Ericsson extends to all products manufactured or sold by Sony Ericsson that practice the claimed invention. Information regarding additional Sony Ericsson products will be identified during the discovery phase of this litigation.

20116857.1

T L

A N

f A . B 0 S T 0 N . L 0 S A N C E L E

5

M I N N E A

P 0 L I S

N A P L E S . S

A I N T

P A U L . W A 5 H I N C f O N , D . C .

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 14 of 36

Mr. James M. O s n le December 9,2004 Page 2

Very truly yours,

ROBINS, KAPLAN, m E R & ClRESI L.L.P.

Stacie E Oberts .
SE0:jw
cc: Matthew L. Woods

20116857.1

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 15 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 16 of 36

1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

I

STACE E OBERTS . (612) 3494235

December 9,2004
KEA FACSIMILE and U.S. MAIL
Ms. Avelyn Marie Ross Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. The Terrace 7 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746-7568

Re:

Honeywell Inc. v. Apple Computer, ?ne. et al Our File No,: 019896-0229

Dear Ms. Ross:

I write in response to your letter to Martin R. h e c k regarding the above-referenced action.
Pursuant to your request, Honeywell is willing to identify the following Dl products that el Honeywell has already confirmed i f i n g e the '371 patent: Inspiron 8600, Inspiron I8000 PPOl, Inspiron 600M,and Inspiron 700M. These products contain LCD modules from the following manufacturers: Sharp, Quanta Display, and AU. This is by no means intended to be a comprehensive list of Dell's infringing products. Honeywell's infringement assertionagainst Dell extends to all products manufactured or sold byDell that practice the claimed invention. Information regarding additionalDell products will be identified during the discovery phase of this litigation. Very truly yours,

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

L&OU
SE0:jw c: Matthew L. Woods
20116857.1

Stack E. Oberts

,

T

L A N T A - B O S T O N . L 0 S A N G E L E S

r M I N N E A P 0 L I S

N A P L E S . S A I H T P A U 1 . W

A S

H I W

C

T

0

N. D.C

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 17 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 18 of 36

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

S T A a E OBERTs . (612) 349-823s

December 20,2004

PZ4 FACSiMiLE AND US.&!AIL M .Andrew R. Kopsidas r Fish & Richarhon P.C.
1425 K Street, N.W. 1 lth Floor Washington,DC 20005

Re:

Honeywell Inc. v. Audiovox Corp. Civil Action No. 04-1338 Our File No.: 019896-0229

Da Mr. Kopsidas: er
I write in response to your letter of December 16 to Martin R. Lueck regarding the above referenced action.

Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confinned that the following products that are manufacturedand soldbyNokia Corporation andNokia Inc. (collectively`Wolcia") infiinge the `371 patent:
3650 3600 3620 3660 NGage QD 6600 6620 NGAGE

20117941.1
T i

a

U

t

1

.

R

n

c T n N . I

n r A N G E L e

S I

M I N N E A P o 1

i s l A~P

L E S

.s

A I

N T P A

u L - w

A S H I N G T O N. D.C

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 19 of 36

Andrew R. Kopsidas December 20,2004 Page 2
This list is by no means a comprehensive list of Nokia's infringingproducts. Honeywell's infringement assertion against Nokia relates to all products manufactured and sold by Nokia which contain LCD moduleswhich practice the claimed invention. Information regarding additional Nokia products that infringe the `371 patent will be identified during the discoveryphase of this litigation.

Very truly yours,

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MTLLER & ClRESI L.L.P.

Stacie E. Oberts
SE0:jw

cc: Matthew L. Woods

2011794 1.I

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 20 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 21 of 36

FROM MNA&T/30 2 -6 5 8-3 9 89

(WED) 1. 5 ' 0 5 10:19/ST. 10:18/NO. 4261916215 P 2

Momus, NICHOLS, ARSHT T~TNNELL
1201 N o m MauEl;r srprrr

P.O. Box 1347 WXLUINCTOH, u w m 19899-1347 Dr
302 658 $200 302 658 3989 FAX

T a a w 0. Qmrvy so2575 7273 3Oa 428 4661 F u
y.imdarasLcom

January 5,2005

BY F A C S W I $
Mailhew W.Siegd, EsquLe Stmock & Shock & Lavm U P 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038

R: e
DearMatt:

Honeywell Internatid Inc, et al. v Apple . ComputerInc.. et al. C.A. 04-1 No.

.

In response to your two issues raised yesterday and to confirm the voicemaii I left for you yestday afternoon:
(1) Honeywell is willing to provide Fqji with an identification of the Fuji products
that Honeywell

believes Minge based upon Honeywell's invmtigition to datu. investigation may reveal other ixl&ngkg Fuji products.

Further

(2) Without knowing what basis Fuji believes exists for a change i venue, n Honepel1 cannot agree not to oppose a motion to transfer should Fuji decide to, file one.

Thomas C.Grimm
TCG
CF:

L

Denise S.Rahne, Esquim (by facsimile)

PAGE 212 * RMAT 115(20051:20:20 AM [Cenlral Standard Time]* SVR:W4IG"FM * DNIS:612 * C8~:3026583981* C DURATION (mm.ss):OO136

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 22 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 23 of 36

7 ATTORNEYS AT LAW

I

STACE E O E T . BRS (612) 349-8235

January 5,2005
Kt4 FACSIMILE Ah23 U.S. MAIL

Ms. Mamoni Bhattacharyya Wed, Gotshal &Manges LLP 767 F f h Avenue it New Yo& N 10153-0119 Y
Re: Honeywell Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al. Civil Action No. 04-1338 O r File No.: 019896-0229 u

Dear Ms. Bhattacharyya:

I write in response to your letter of D c m e 21,2004 regarding the above-referenced eebr
action.

First, I want to reiterate that the specific ME1 and MECA products t a were identified in my ht letter ofDecember 3 are not the only products that are accused of infringing the `371 patent. As I already stated, all products manufactured andor sold by ME1 and MECA that practice the claimed invention are accused products.
A to your request for additional information regarding Honeywell's infringement s allegations, there is no basis for Honeywell to provide a specific identification of how the products satisfjr the claims of the `371 patent at this time.

20118597.1
T L A N T
A

. B O S T O N . L 0

S

A N G E L E S l M I N N E A P 0 L I S l N A P L E S . S A I N T P A U L . W A S H I N G T 0 N, D.C.

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 24 of 36

Ms. Mmoni Bhattacharyya January 5,2005 Page 2

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
H

Stacie E Oberts . SE0:jw
cc: Matthew L.Woods

20118597.1

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 25 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 26 of 36

I

-

ATTORNEYS

AT LAW
STACIE E OBERTS . (612) 349-8235

May 2,2005

vL4 FACSIMILE AMI US.lMAIL
Mr. Pad A. Bradley McCarter & English, LLP 919 N. Market Street P.O. 11 1 Box Wilmington, DE 19899
Re: Honeywell Im. v. Audiovox Coy. et al. Civil Action No. 04-1338 Our File No.: 019896-0229

Dear Mr. Bradley:

I write in response to your mail of April 23 regarding the abovereferenced action.

Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confirmed that the following product that is manufactured by Audiovox Electronics Corporation infringes the `371 patent:

DVD player, model no. D1210
This is by no means a comprehensive list of AEC's infiinging products. Honeywell's Miingernent assertion against AEC relates to all products rnanufhctured and sold by AEC which contain LCD modules which practice the claimed invention. Idormation regarding additionalAEC products that infiingethe `371patent will be identified during the discoveryphase ofthis litigation.

O rinvestigation has revealed thatthe model identifiedabove contains a Sharp LCD module. u Honeywelljust recently entered into a licensing agreementwith Sharp,and accordingly any devices
using that module are now Eicensed. Regardless, Honeywell has hformation that AEC obtains LCD modules fkom other unlicensed suppliers and incorporates them into products sold by AEC. Please give me a call at your convenience so that we can discuss how to proceed.

20133211.1

` L A N T A - B 0 S T 0 N . L 0 S A N G

E L E 5 ( M I N N E

A

P

0

L I S I N A P L E $ 4 I N T P A U L.W A

A S

H I N G T 0 N , D . C .

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF
...

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 27 of 36

Mr. Paul A. Bradley May2,2005 Page 2

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & -I S

L.L.P.

U O h A
SE0:jw Stacie E Oberts .

20133211.1

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 28 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 29 of 36

STACIEE OBERTS .
(612) 349-8235

May 2,2004

Mr. Robert J. Benson Hogan & Hartson LLP 500 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Re: Honeywell International, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al O r File No. 019896.0229 u

Dear Mr. Benson:

I write in response to your voicemail to Tom Grimmregarding the above-referenced action.
Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confinned that the following accused products contain LCD modules that are manufactured and sold by Seiko Epson which infi-inge the `371 patent: Kodak digital still camera, model no. DX 4530 (LCD model no. 2F0145POO) Kyocera cell phone, model no,7135 (LCD model No. CV90-1216-01) Nokia cell phone, model no. 3650 (LCD model no. L2F50011 S5) Nokia cell phone, model no. 3600 (LCD Model no. L2F50011) Nokia cell phone, model no. 3620 (LCD model no. L2F50011) Nokia cell phone, model no. 3660 (LCD model no. L2F50011)

.

T i list is by no means a comprehensive list of Seiko Epson's infringing LCD modules. hs
Honeywell's infringement assertions relate to all products manufactured and sold by the named defendants which contain any Seiko Epson LCD modules which practice the claimed invention. Informationregarding additionalLCD modules that infringethe `371patent will be identified during the discovery phase of this litigation.

Very truly yours,

ROBINS,KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
Stacie E. Oberts

SE0:jw
20133224.1

T L A N T A . B 0 S T 0 N - L 0 S A N

G

E L E S

M I N N E

A

P 0 L I S I N

A

P L E

S . S

A I N T P A U L - W A S H I

N G T 0 N. D . C .

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 30 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 31 of 36

STACIE E OBERTS .
(612) 349-8235

May 2,2005

Mr. Robert J. Benson Hogan & Hartson LLP 500 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1900 Los Angela, CA 90071
Re:

.
.I

.

Honeywell International, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al O r File No. 019896.0229 u

Dear M .Benson: r I write in response to your voicemail to Tom GTimm in the abovereferenced matter.
Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confirmed that the following products that are manufactured and sold by Kyocera kf3nge the `371 patent:
t

Kyocera 7135.

KX414
sE47

SL3OOR

This list is byno means a comprehensive list of Kyocera's idiingbgproducts. Honeywell's
infihgement a s r i n against Kyocera relates to all products manufktured and sold by Kyocera seto which containLCDmodules which practicethe claimed invention. Informationregarding additional Kyocera products that a g e the `371 patent will be identified during the discovery phase of this ltgto. iiain

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. n

SEOjw
2 1 1167.1 03

r L A N I

A . B O

s r

O N . L O

s

A N G E L E

s

1.

I

N H e

A

P o L I

s

N A P L E

s

` 5 A I N T P A

U L - wA s

H I N G T O N.D.C.

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 32 of 36

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 33 of 36

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

STACIE OBERTS E .
(612) 349-8235

May 6,2005

vL4 FACSIMILE AND US.MAIL
Mr. Nelson M. Kee Howrey LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw Washington DC 20004-2401
Re: Optrex America Inc. v. Honeywell Our File No. 019896-0229

D a Kee: er
As we discussed in our telephone conversation yesterday, enclosed please find correspondence which we provided to both Kyocera and Nokia regarding Honeywell's infringement allegations. As stated in those letters, this is not a comprehensive list of infiinging products which are sold by Kyocera and Nokia. Honeywell reserves the right to identify additional infiinging products sold by Kyocera and Nokia during the discovery phase of this litigation.
A we also discussed, Philips has filed a cross claim, alleging that LCD modules which it s

sells to Kyocera and Nokia do not infkinge the `371 patent. To facilitate our investigation for purposes of responding to Philips' cross claim, please specifythose LCD modules by description and model number which Philips provides to Kyocera and Nokia. We would also appreciate if Philips would provide samples of those LCD modules or documentation, including specifications, schematics and drawings regarding the modules as soon as possible. I understand that you must confer with your client in this regard, and that you will get back to me sometime next week.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,

ROBINS,KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

Stacie E. Oberts SE0:jw

T L A N T A - B O S T 0 N . L O S A N G E L E S

M I N N E A P 0 L I S

N A P L E S . S A I N T P A U L . W

A

S H I N G T O N . D.C

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 34 of 36

STACIE E. OBERTS
(612) 349-8235

May 2,2005
Mr. Robert J. Benson Hogan & Hartson LLP 500 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Re:

Honeywell International, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et a1 O r File No.0 19896.0229 u

Dear Mi. Benson:
I write in response to your voicemail to Tom G r i m in the above-referenced matter.

Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confirmed that the following products that are the `371 patent: manufbctured and sold by Kyocera &ge Kyocera 7135,

KX414
s4 E7 SL3OOR

T i list is by no means a comprehensive list of Kyocera's infiingingproducts. Honeywell's hs
infringement assertion against Kyocera relates to all products manufkctured and sold by Kyocera which containLCD modules which practice the claimed invention. Information regarding additional Kyocera products that hfkinge the `371 patent will be identified during the discovery phase of this litigation.

very truly yours,
ROBINS, KAPLAN, m L E R & ClRESI L.L.P.
A

p0Lf3
acis E. Oberts

SEOjw
20131167.1

T L A N T A - 6 O S T 0 N * L 0

S A N C

E L E S

M 1

N N E A

P

0

L I S

N A P L 6

S . S

A I N T

P A U

L.W A

S

H I N G T 0 N. D . C .

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 35 of 36

800 LASALLBAVSNUB

STACIE E OBERTS . ( 1 )349-8235 62

December 20,2004

m FACSMZEAND as. ill^
Mi. Andrew R.Kopsidas Fish & Richardson P.C. 1425 K Street, N.W. 1Ith Floor Washington, DC 20005

Re:

Honeywell Inc. v. Audiovox Corp. Civil Action No. 04-1338 Our File No.: 019896-0229

Dear Mr. Kopsidas:
I write i response t your letter of December 16 to Martin R.Lueck regarding the above n o referenced action.

Pursuant to your request, Honeywell has confirmed that the following products that are mmufacturedand sold by Nokia CorporationandNokiaJnc. (collectively "Nokia") i f i g e t h e `371 patent:
3650 3600 3620 3660 NGage QD 6600 6620 NGAGE

20117941.1
T L
A N T A . 8

0 S T 0 N - L 0 S A N G E L 6 S

M I N N B A P 0 L I S

N A P L E S - S A I

H T P A U L.W

A S H I N G T O N u D.C

Case 1:04-cv-01337-JJF
L

Document 121-3

Filed 06/01/2005

Page 36 of 36

Andrew R. Kopsidas December 20,2004 Page 2
This list is by no means a comprehensive list of Nokia's i&inging products. Honeywell's infringement assertionagainst Nokia relates to all productsmanufactured and sold by Nokia which containLCD moduleswhich practice the claimedinvention. InformationregardingadditionalNokia products tbat idiinge the `37 1 patent will be identified during the discovery phase ofthis litigation.

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CRESI L.L.P.

Stack E Oberts .

SE0:jw

cc: Matthew L. woods

20117941.1