Murphy Spadaro & Landon
ATTORNEYS
1011 CENTRE ROAD, SUITE 210
WILMINGTON. DELAWARE 19BU5
PHONE s¤z..w2.a1¤¤ 392-‘m·**‘~‘1
FAX 302.4T2.B135 j;·,patlui·gi@;t11s
BY ELECTRONIC FILING AND HAND DELIVERY
James W. Semple, Esq.
Morris James Hitchens & Williams LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor
PO. Box 2306
Wilmington, DE 19899-2306
RE: Eames v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
C.A. N0.: 04-CV-1324KAJ
Dear Master Scmple:
I enclose a courtesy copy ofthe Eames Plaintift`s' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion
to Compel Documents Responsive to Their Initial Document Requests, and for Sanctions. This
reply was tiled yesterday.
Inotc that Nat_ionwide has requested oral argument on this motion. If the SDM believes
that a hearing would be helpful, then we are happy to argue the motion. Our strong preference,
however, is that the motion be decided on the papers. I say this not only because the briefing is
(I believe) detailed and comprehensive, but also to avoid further delay in resolving a dispute that
is roughly eight months old.
I am available to address any questions regarding this matter.
Respectfully,
fsf John S. Spadaro
John S. Spadaro
JSS/slr
Encl.
cc: Curtis P. Cheyney, Ill, Esq. (by electronic tiling)
l25T66